|
Blood Diamonds Farce
by
Kieron E. Ryan
Naomi
Campbell is in the ridiculous position of having to give testimony
at the war crimes trial of former Liberian warlord Charles Taylor
on the grounds that she received a blood diamond from him. One might
question the company she keeps, but on the diamond issue she should
tell her inquisitors to go to hell.
Blood
Diamond was a fun movie and no doubt had elements of truth
to it. Leonardo di Caprio’s South Africa accent was passable (actually
he portrayed an ex-Rhodesian who had moved onto bigger, badder battles
fighting the white African cause wherever that calling took him).
His real crime was attempting to smuggle diamonds supposedly obtained
by slave labour and destined for the grand arms bazaar that turned
countries like Sierra Leone and Liberia into giant, open-air slaughter
houses. A somewhat embarrassing sub-text to this story is that it
was a company of South African mercenaries, called Executive Outcomes,
that brought peace to Sierra Leone in the 1990s, allowing 300,000
refugees to return home safely before the World Bank forced the
bankrupt government of the time to terminate its contract with the
company. The result? Aluta continua ("the struggle goes
on") as they used to say in Mozambique, as the warlords recaptured
lost ground and the blood diamond trade flourished once more. If
there were no diamonds in Sierra Leone, the warlords would have
traded cassava, cows or rhino horn.
Today,
we have a semblance of peace in these countries. Whether we like
it or not, it was mercenaries who did the job in West Africa with
the kind of resolve noticeably lacking by our peace-loving UN troops.
Even Goma in eastern Congo enjoys a tentative peace. For these tender
mercies, are we to thank the great minds that brought us the Kimberly
Process Certification (KPC) that forces traders in rough diamonds
to certify the source of the stones as conflict-free?
As
someone who has toiled the rivers of Congo for diamonds and interacted
with traders of many nationalities, I have a somewhat jaded view
of the monopoly-seeking grubbers who have criminalised trading in
these precious stones. It is possible to buy stones in Goma, Angola,
Zimbabwe or even South Africa, ship them to Kinshasa in Congo and
then have them sanitised by way of a locally-issued KPC. A few hundred
dollars is all you need. That’s what happens when proscription enters
the scene.
In
truth, an experienced dealer will be able to tell you the source
of the stones, since diamonds of every region carry their own unique
DNA. But he will not be able to tell you whether that particular
stone is conflict-free. Zimbabwean stones have flooded the market
in recent years, and one has to marvel at the resourcefulness of
Zimbabweans who scramble beneath the barbed wire of state interference.
A few years back, close to the border with Mozambique, an enterprising
Zimbabwean stumbled on what turned out to be perhaps the largest
diamond field in the world and happily set about exploiting his
find until the Zanu-PF big-wigs who control that country’s black
markets decreed it state property. The state unleashed the dogs
of war and killed scores of diggers trying to eke out a modest living.
Still the traders find ways to smuggle and bribe their way to South
Africa, clutching parcels of stones to trade and feed their families
back home.
This
is the latest cause célèbre of the blood diamond lobbyists,
though Zimbabwe’s case hardly fits the KPC template: the conflict,
such as it is, is purely economic. That it sustains and nurtures
a despicable regime is an argument without contest. The same diamond
thieves who run that country also control the black markets in fuel
and foreign exchange. Perhaps we need a Kimberly certification process
for these too.
Reports
from Mozambique suggest between 100 and 1,000 smugglers do errands
for Zimbabwean army officers each day, taking stones to Mozambique’s
Villa da Manica, across the border from Mutare in eastern Zimbabwe,
where they are purchased for about $25 a carat by Lebanese traders
and then on-sold to overseas buyers for as much as $1,000 a carat.
That still does not classify these stones as blood diamonds. There
is no on-going war to warrant such a label. The KPC website says
"The Kimberley Process (KP) is a joint governments, industry
and civil society initiative to stem the flow of conflict diamonds
– rough diamonds used by rebel movements to finance wars against
legitimate governments."
I
scratch my head and try to think of a rebel war anywhere in the
world currently funded by diamonds. Maybe there is one I haven’t
heard about. Call Zimbabwe’s diamond trade it an economic crime
if you will, but these are no blood diamonds. A Congolese friend
was recently robbed of R100,000 (US$13,500) at gunpoint in Lesotho
when attempting to purchase stones and smuggle them across the border
to South Africa. Should we classify these as conflict stones, or
simply a trophy of crime?
In
Congo you can visit the open air diamond markets any day of the
week. You can buy stones – and, yes, they try to rip off foreigners
– but no-one will ask about licences. Nor will the buyer insist
on a KPC. The bureaucrats who handle this end of the paperwork are
bought and sold. Every Comptoir (or diamond-dealing house)
in MbujiMayi or Tshikapa, central Congo, has government officials
present at all times to keep count of the diamond transactions.
These officials are bought off with $50 or $100 a day. The under-count
at this end of the global diamond trade is stupendous.
Despite
all the hoopla about blood diamonds in Congo, the conflict was confined
to the eastern Goma region of the country. Other than an occasional
skirmish, there was no conflict in Kasai province, where some of
the world’s richest alluvial diamond deposits are found. In fact
this is one of the most peaceful places I have ever had the pleasure
to visit. You can walk around MbujiMayi at 11:00pm at night and
feel safer than you do in Johannesburg, London or Nairobi.
The
argument for free trade in diamonds is rooted in the ancient human
struggle for economic liberty. If I buy a product with my hard-earned
money, it is then my private property. The law says so. Not in the
case of diamonds.
In
South Africa it is illegal to carry rough diamonds without a rough
diamond trading licence. Polished diamonds, no problem, according
to the monopoly rules. The same is true in Congo, though I suspect
less than 5% of Congolese diggers and traders carry such licences.
Any day of the week at the heavily fortified Jewel City in central
Johannesburg you will find traders of every stripe hawking rough
stones from Zimbabwe (the newest source of "blood diamonds"),
Congo, Angola and Lesotho. Few of them have the necessary licences.
The diamond police set up snares to catch them, and those without
licences are likely to have their stones confiscated. What then
happens to these stones is anybody’s guess, but it is a scheme ripe
for corruption. We know that many of these stones then reappear
on the market for resale. As a diamond trader recently remarked
to me: "This must be the only country in the world where a
private company has its own police force to enforce its monopoly."
He was, of course, talking about De Beers, whose grip on the world
diamond trade has ebbed in recent years.
State-sanctioned
monopolies of any kind inevitably attract armies of bureaucrats,
criminals and carpet-baggers. Like the hopelessly ineffective war
on drugs, the war on blood diamonds has not only been lost, it is
pointless and can never be enforced. Diamonds are small five
carats is equivalent to one gram. You can hide a 20-carat stone
in your mouth and walk through pretty much any customs post. Depending
on the quality, you can then sell that for perhaps US$50,000 and
go home to repeat the cycle. You may not win the Ethics in Business
Award, but smugglers don’t play in that league.
In
reality, bloods diamonds are a giant hoax. All over Africa, tens
of thousands of diggers and traders make an honest living finding
and selling stones. They carry no guns and do not trade with warlords.
Few of them know anything about the KPC. Once the stones leave Kinshasa
or Luanda, the exporter simply tidies up the paperwork for the recipient
in Brussels, Tel Aviv or Mumbai. It can be done in hours. Every
time. Without fail. Even if the stones are sourced in conflict areas,
it is guaranteed that for a small fee they can be laundered through
the KPC process and end up on someone’s finger in North America
or Europe.
This
is not to say that the diamond trade is rotten to the core. Not
all stones are handled this way – there are many dealers who stick
rigidly to the rules of the game. But diamonds are a perfect store
of movable value: they are small, light, easy to conceal.
The
old argument that diamonds are a fabricated market holds some truth.
The diggers in Congo will be mining diamonds 300 or 500 years from
now, such is the abundance of stones under its rivers. I have seen
yields of 35 carats per cubic metre of gravels in one location,
and have heard of pockets of diamonds as much as 800 carats per
cubic metre. Compare that with the 2 carats per hundred cubic metres
you typically find in the Ventersdorp diamond field in eastern South
Africa. Africa is awash with precious stones. No matter the source
of the stones, we all turn to the Rapaport price list to determine
the selling price, based on colour, clarity, carat and cut ("the
four C’s"). Rapaport prices continue to rise, despite a temporary
dip following the 2008 commodity bath.
Are
diamonds in short supply? Not really, it just costs a lot of money
to extract them, and poor diggers will work the most accessible
ones. Are they the most beautiful stones? That is a matter of taste.
Wherever
taxes and prohibition are involved, smuggling will occur. Diamonds
are harmless, if over-priced, commodities, and it’s time we started
to fight back against the ridiculous and ineffective encroachment
on our freedoms that the KPC represents.
August
11, 2010
Kieron
Ryan [send him mail]
is a South African-based writer and commodities entrepreneur who
has worked in the diamond trade in Congo, South Africa and elsewhere
on the continent. He grew up in Africa, studied in Dublin, lived
for a while in the US, but prefers the freedom and chaos that Africa
offers over just about any other place.
Copyright
© 2010 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
|