German Gold Claw Back Causes Concern
by
John Browne
Euro
Pacific Capital
Recently
by John Browne: Report
Raises Questions About Central Bank Gold Holdings
Last week
the Bundesbank (the German central bank) surprised markets around
the world by announcing that it will repatriate a sizable portion
of its gold bullion reserves held in France and the United States.
To many, the news from the world's second largest holder of gold
signaled a growing, if clandestine, mistrust among central banks,
possibly fueled by diverging policy goals. The Germans have attempted
to tamp down the alarm by highlighting the myriad of logistical,
practical and historical reasons that qualified the announcement
as unremarkable. But the size, scope, and timing of the move makes
it hard not to draw more strategic conclusions.
Coming during
a time of supposed central bank cooperation, the decision to withdraw
billions of dollars of bullion was bound to raise eyebrows. At present,
Germany has official gold holdings of some 3,396 tonnes. 1,500 tonnes
resides in New York and 374 tonnes in Paris. Between now and 2020,
Germany will repatriate 674 tonnes of gold - 300 from the Fed in
New York (valued at $17.9 billion) and the entire 374 tonne allotment
from Paris (valued at $22.3 billion).
Although financial
leaders like Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke have said that gold "is not
money" and senior investors like Warren Buffet have described it
as "a barbarous relic," the movement of gold nevertheless makes
a strong emotional impact. Is such a response justified?
Following World
War II, the threat of a sudden Soviet invasion convinced many Western
European nations to diversify their gold holdings abroad, particularly
overseas to the U.S and the UK. Today, Germany holds only 31 percent
of its gold within the Bundesbank. Of the remainder, 45 percent
is held at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, 11 percent with
the Banque de France in Paris, and 13 percent with the Bank of England
in London. But now that the Russian military threat has dissipated,
the Germans have rightly reevaluated its dispositions.
For decades,
central banks have been secretive about their gold holdings. Despite
this, few doubt the published aggregate gold holdings of central
banks. But serious questions arise as to the precise ownership of
the gold held in the vaults of central banks and some commercial
banks. To the astonishment of many German citizens and international
observers, the Bundesbank admitted some years ago that it had not
held an audit of its gold holdings for decades, if ever. (See
my prior commentary on this subject)
The developed
nations of the world have adopted a form of Keynesian economics
that has created a world awash with debased fiat currency supported
by seemingly unsupportable mountains of official debt. In such a
world, it is understandable that German citizens feel their nation's
gold should be held at home. Such sentiment could spread. Holland's
CDA Party already has asked that their nation's 612 tonnes, or metric
tons, of gold be repatriated from the U.S., the UK and from Canada.
Some question
whether such sentiments will spread and expose even a shortage of
physical gold in hitherto trusted vaults. In addition, in a world
where trust in central banks is waning fast, central banks themselves
may become mistrusting of each other.
At the same
time, central banks in the developing world, particularly in China
and Southeast Asia, are accumulating gold, as are nations like Russia,
Turkey and Ukraine. China is now the world's largest producer of
gold worldwide, but she retains her production and even buys more
on the open market. This has occurred even while no major central
banks are selling significant amounts of gold. The Bank of England's
disastrous selling campaign in the early years of the current century,
in which it sold hundreds of tons below $300 per ounce, is no doubt
a controlling factor.
The unwillingness
of central banks to part with their hoarding of gold, highlighted
by Germany's repatriation, contrasts starkly with the central bank
policies of the 1970s and 1980s, when concerted efforts were made
to de-monetize gold, which could only be done through active selling.
Does this change reflect a growing and shared distrust of fiat currency
by sophisticated private investors who hoard gold?
The repatriation
of even a part of Germany's central bank gold holdings, especially
if followed by other nations such as Holland, should be regarded
with concern. Today, no central bank would dare to risk rocking
the central banking boat. But as the Keynesian economies have slid
towards financial disaster, any increase in central bank gold repatriation
could indicate a real fear by the great insiders - central banks.
A particularly
interesting aspect of the announcement that has been largely ignored
is the extraordinarily lengthy seven year time period in which the
Germans expect to receive back their gold. The 300 tons they're
repatriating from the New York Fed reflects just five percent of
the more than 6,700 tons held there. It strikes many as unusual
that the Fed would need so much time to deliver what should be a
manageable withdrawal.
January
24, 2013
John
Browne is senior market strategist for Euro Pacific Capital.
Copyright
© 2013 Euro Pacific Capital
|