The
South and Southern History
by
Clyde Wilson
Basic Books
Literature
about the South and Southern history is vast – largely because non-Southerners
have always found the South interesting. The greatest part of this
literature is written from the viewpoint of the outsider diagnosing
sin (in the 19th century) or pathology (since). The assumption apparently
is that any people who don't want to be like Massachusetts must
be either sick or evil.
Some
of the "authorities" who spend their time studying the South even
say, strangely, that it does not exist – it is merely a delusion
created by bigotry and pellagra – though nothing could be more obvious
than that Southerners have a separate historical experience and
culture.
Despite
the overwhelming mass of negative and distorted literature, there
are many books, old and new, that are sympathetic or even-handed
and that convey real knowledge about the region that one good history
book defines as "not quite a nation within the nation, but the next
thing to it."
A
certain number of outsiders, generally morally and intellectually
superior to the critics, have always found the South interesting
and admirable. Remember the vast popularity of Gone
With the Wind.
That
Southerners agreed to go into a Union with Northerners in 1789 has
made them available for endless attention and correction. If they
were politically separate, Northerners would have no basis for assuming
moral and economic dictatorship over Southerners. It is also true
that much "American" history is actually Southern history.
Southern
history that is well regarded (like George Washington and Thomas
Jefferson used to be) becomes "American," which makes it non-Southern,
which absorbs it into Northern. To most writers only the "bad" history
is "Southern" – Andrew Jackson is "American," while Nathan Bedford
Forrest, who came out of the same place and culture a generation
later, is "Southern." Works cited are generally in print or otherwise
fairly easily obtainable except those marked with *. The latter
will probably require a very good library or a serious used book
search.
General
Works
The
best (rather, the only good) overall history of the Southern region
and people is quoted in the third paragraph above. That book is
A
History of the South by Francis Butler Simkins, first published
by Knopf in 1947. It went through many editions, with suitable revisions
by Charles Pierce Roland, until it was suppressed some time in the
1970s. It is a good place to start reading Southern history. It
sold widely as a textbook and there are many used copies around.
When
approaching the history of a people, it is good to start with their
particular spirit, which is the most important and the most continuous
thing. For this purpose there is much good recent or available material:
John
Shelton Reed's straightforward essay on "Southerners" in The
Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, a reference work
that is usually available in larger public libraries. See also Reed's
The
Enduring South.
The
best-selling works of Ronald and Donald Kennedy, The
South Was Right, Why
Not Freedom?, and Was
Jefferson Davis Right?
The
works of M.E. Bradford, any and all. Some will be mentioned later.
For the moment: A
Better Guide than Reason, Remembering
Who We Are, and The
Reactionary Imperative.
The
works of Richard M. Weaver, any and all, starting with The
Southern Essays of Richard M. Weaver, Ideas
Have Consequences, and Visions
of Order.
The
Creed of the Old South*, a pair of beautiful essays by Basil
L. Gildersleeve. The author was the greatest American classical
scholar and a Confederate soldier who explained things to fair-minded
Northerners after Reconstruction.
Discussions:
Secular by the Rev. Robert Lewis Dabney. Dabney was a great
theologian and a close friend of Stonewall Jackson who brilliantly
expressed the Southern viewpoint on many recurrent public issues.
The work has been reprinted by Sprinkle Publications as vol. 4 of
Dabney's works.
Then, the classic by Twelve Southerners, I'll
Take My Stand: The South and the Agrarian Tradition. Less
well-known but equally important is its sequel, Who
Owns America?.
See
also Regionalism
and Nationalism in the United States (originally titled
Attack on Leviathan) by the Southern poet and essayist Donald
Davidson, and Fifteen Southerners, Why
the South Will Survive*.
The
Encyclopedia of Southern Culture, coedited by Bill Clinton's
choice to head the NEH, can be safely ignored except for subjects
having to do with 20th-century popular culture like "The
Beverly Hillbillies."
Another
good general reference that should be in many public libraries is
Jay B. Hubbell, The
South in American Literature.
Let
me call attention to a set of general histories of the United States
from a Southern viewpoint. Waddy Thompson wrote, beginning in the
early 20th century, high-school texts which went through numerous
editions and were widely used in public schools in the South up
until recent decades. These are perfect for homeschoolers who need
a straightforward, honest account of history. The same can be said
for J. Steven Wilkins, America: The First 350 Years. The
magnificent Mises Institute publications contain much that bears
on The War, "Reconstruction," and Constitutional issues. To wit,
John V. Denson, ed., Costs
of War and Reassessing
the Presidency; and David Gordon, ed., Secession,
State, and Liberty.
The
War
For
understanding the War of Southern Independence (still the most deadly
and revolutionary event in American history) two works are indispensable:
Charles Adams's instant classic, When
in the Course of Human Events, and Ludwell H. Johnson's
North over South. The best general history of the war that
has ever been or ever will be written is by a Southerner, Shelby
Foote's The
Civil War: A Narrative (3 vols.), a true masterpiece that
is just as sympathetic and profound in regard to the Northern side
as the Southern.
There
are said to be more books on the War than on any other subject except
Christianity. We can only touch the surface of this vast material
by pointing to a few worthy titles:
Rod
Gragg, The
Illustrated Confederate Reader
Gary
Gallagher, The
Confederate War
Robert
Selph Henry, The
Story of the Confederacy
Thomas
di Lorenzo, The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an
Unnecessary War (New York: Forum Books/Random House, 2002).
Marshall
DeRosa, ed. The
Politics of Dissolution
Walter
Sullivan, ed., The
War the Women Lived
Bart
R. Talbert, Maryland:
The South's First Casualty
Felicity
Allen, Jefferson
Davis: Unconquerable Heart
Jefferson
Davis, The
Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government
Douglas
Southall Freeman, R.E.
Lee; and for the young, Stanley F. Horn, Boy's Book of
Robert E. Lee*. Ignore the ludicrous biographies by Connelly
and Noland. For Lee see also Richard Adams, Traveller
and J. Steven Wilkins, The
Call of Duty.
John
S. Tilley, Lincoln
Takes Command
Charles
C. Minor, The
Real Lincoln
William
Gilmore Simms, The
Sack and Destruction of Columbia, South Carolina (eyewitness
account by the South's greatest writer at the time)
Stanley
F. Horn, The
Army of Tennessee
Richard
Taylor, Destruction
and Reconstruction
Raphael
Semmes, Memoirs of Service Ashore and Afloat
Robert
S. Henry, "First
with the Most" Forrest. The more recent Forrest biography
by Jack W. Hurst is not bad, but avoid the PC version by Brian Wills.
John
W. Thomason, Jeb
Stuart
James
I. Robertson, Stonewall
Jackson
Raimondo
Luraghi, History
of the Confederate Navy
Robert
N. Rosen, The
Jewish Confederates
Kelly
J. O'Grady, Clear
the Confederate Way: The Irish in the Army of Northern Virginia
Charles
K. Barrow, et al., Black
Confederates
Arthur
J.L. Fremantle, Three
Months in the Southern States
Much
the best way to grasp the Southern spirit and experience in the
war is through music and literature. One of the countless deceptions
perpetrated by the notorious Ken Burns TV "documentary" on the war
was the omission of most white Southern music – which is certainly
as interesting as the Northern and black music that was used. Five
volumes of "Songs of the C.S.A." recorded by Bobby Horton of Birmingham,
Alabama, give a complete range of Confederate experience – patriotism,
battle, loss, hardship, humor.
The
South's novelists have been much greater than its historians. The
Southern experience of the war is truly and movingly portrayed in
such works as William Faulkner's The
Unvanquished, Caroline Gordon's None
Shall Look Back, Mary Johnston's The
Long Roll, Madison Jones's Nashville:
1864; John W. Thomason's Lone
Star Preacher, James Warner Bellah's The Valiant Virginians*,
and many others. Don't forget the Confederate poets Henry
Timrod and Father
Abram J. Ryan as well as Donald Davidson's Lee in the Mountains
and Other Poems. The recent films "Pharoah's Army" and "Ride
With the Devil" are good in the same way, as is at least the
early part of Clint Eastwood's "Outlaw
Josey Wales."
"Reconstruction"
No
period of Southern history has been covered by more distortions
in recent times than has 18651876. Not too long ago, nearly
everybody, including Northerners, regarded this period as a shameful
un-American exercise in military rule and limitless corruption.
Now, it is established academic "truth" that the only thing wrong
with Reconstruction was that it was not ruthless enough. The South
should have been subjected to a complete Marxist, egalitarian revolution.
It
seems irrelevant to the current "experts" on Reconstruction that
such would have required Northerners to have had ideas and purposes
rather different from what they could imagine at the time, and that
it would have required totalitarianism and mass executions, not
to mention violation of the terms of surrender, none of which would
have bothered Radical Republicans if they could have gotten away
with it.
The
books by Ludwell Johnson, Thomas Di Lorenzo, and Richard Taylor
cited above are essential for Reconstruction. I suggest also the
following:
E.
Merton Coulter, The
South During Reconstruction and Civil
War and Readjustment in Kentucky
John
N. Edwards, Noted
Guerillas, or the Warfare of the Border, definitive on the
era of Jesse James.
Robert
Selph Henry, The
Story of Reconstruction
Stanley
F. Horn, The
Invisible Empire
John
Chodes, "The Union League: Washington's Klan" (League
of the South Paper)
Walter
L. Fleming, Sequel
of Appomattox
Howard
K. Beale, The
Critical Year
I
prefer the above works to the often-cited Claude G. Bowers's The
Tragic Era which is good on the evils of Reconstruction,
but written from the viewpoint of Northerners who turned against
it rather than Southerners who suffered through it.
For
serious students there is Walter L. Fleming, A
Documentary History of Reconstruction, assuming it has not
yet been purged from libraries. While we are at it, there is still
a lot to be learned from films such as "The
Birth of a Nation" and "Gone
With the Wind." The main thing wrong with "Birth" is too favorable
a view of Lincoln. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries,
Southerners like D.W. Griffith, the director, and Thomas Dixon,
who wrote the novel that was used as a base, went out of their way
to be good Americans and give some respect to the prevailing Northern
sentiments. Besides, after Reconstruction, Lincoln and the war looked
less bad.
State
Rights and the Real Constitution
St.
George Tucker, A
View of the Constitution of the United States, with Selected Writings.
Tucker was the first great American legal authority, who understood
perfectly what the Constitution really says.
The
works of John Taylor of Caroline. New
Views of the Constitution, in a recent edition edited by
James McClellan, provides an excellent entry into Taylor's sometimes
difficult works. Taylor's Tyranny
Unmasked also has a recent edition.
M.E.
Bradford, A
Better Guide than Reason, Founding
Fathers, and Original
Intentions
Alexander
H. Stephens, A
Constitutional View of the Late War Between the States
Marshall
L. DeRosa, The
Confederate Constitution of 1861
Russell
Kirk, John
Randolph of Roanoke
John
C. Calhoun. The
Essential Calhoun, ed. by Clyde N. Wilson, is a good place
to start. See also H. Lee Cheek, Jr., Calhoun
and Popular Rule, and Margaret Coit, John
C. Calhoun: American Portrait
Albert
Taylor Bledsoe, Is Jefferson Davis a Traitor?
Robert
L. Dabney, A
Defense of Virginia and the South
See
also "The
Great Civil War Debate," a video from American Vision with J.
Steven Wilkins and Peter Marshall.
Donald
Livingston, "Secession and the Modern State," and Clyde
N. Wilson, "From Union to Empire," are numbers in the
League of the South Papers series. LOS also has available many video
and audiotape lectures about Constitutional and other questions.
This is only to scratch the surface of a wealth of literature, but
it will get anyone started.
A
good basic treatment of American government is James McClellan:
Liberty, Order, and Justice.
The
First South: Colonial and Revolutionary History
John
R. Alden, The
First South*
Louis
B. Wright, The First Gentlemen of Virginia. See also Wright's
edition of Robert Beverley's History and Present State of Virginia*,
the first original work of Southern (and American) literature (1715).
Douglas
S. Freeman, George
Washington
Dumas
Malone, Jefferson
and His Time
Albert
J. Nock, Jefferson
Thomas
Jefferson's writings, which can be found in many versions in print
and libraries: "Autobiography,"
Notes on the State of Virginia, public papers, especially
the Kentucky Resolutions and the first inaugural, and letters.
Letterbook
of Eliza Lucas Pinckney. A magnificent South Carolina lady
who founded the indigo industry and mothered two signers of the
Declaration of Independence.
M.E.
Bradford, A
Better Guide Than Reason and Remembering
Who We Are
For
more serious students, Richard Beale Davis, Intellectual
Life in the Colonial South, 3 vols. Good for dipping into
and the definitive proof that New England had no monopoly of "American"
learning and culture.
William
Gilmore Simms, The
Life of Francis Marion. Consciously or not, Mel Gibson's
film "The
Patriot" followed the trail that was blazed by Simms in regard
to the Revolutionary War in the lower South. Simms wrote a series
of novels, assiduously researched, set in Revolutionary South Carolina,
which give a feel for the people, place, and time that can be found
nowhere else. Among the more notable of these are Woodcraft,
Katherine Walton, and The
Scout. And the prolific Simms wrote a similar series about
the colonial South, including The Cassique of Kiowa and The
Yemassee. Many readers think that Simms knew Native Americans
and frontiersman better than James Fenimore Cooper.
An
important aspect of the history of the South in this period is the
movement across the Appalachians. For a start try Marquis James,
Andrew
Jackson: Border Captain* and Elizabeth Madox Roberts's wonderful
novel of early Kentucky, The
Great Meadow.
The
Old South: Plantation and Plain Folk
Mention of the antebellum South, not too long ago, commonly brought
up pleasant images of a peaceful, dignified, charming way of life.
(You can still get that feeling from surviving plantations, like
Mount Vernon.) Now the mention brings up lurid images of chains
and whips. Both ideas of the Old South are caricatures that have
been believed mainly by outsiders. The latter image, as a generalization,
is as much or more untrue as the former.
I should make clear that slavery and the plantation did not make
up the whole of Southern life and culture by any means. As one fine
historian put it, the plantations were prominent hills in the Southern
landscape but took up only a small portion of the land. Most of
the topography was covered by smaller independent farms, where most
of the population, including a large fraction of the black people,
lived.
Louis Filler, Slavery
in the United States, is a reasonably dispassionate and
comprehensive survey.
Ulrich
B. Phillips, Life
and Labor in the Old South*. Now out of favor, Phillips
was in fact a great historian who did more research about American
slavery than anyone ever has and who was a progressive for his time.
Raimondo Luraghi, The
Rise and Fall of the Plantation South*
Robert M. Myers, ed., Children
of Pride
James E. Kibler, Our
Father's Fields
Duncan L. Heyward, Seed
from Madagascar
Avery O. Craven, The
Coming of the Civil War*
Joseph Hergesheimer, Swords
and Roses*
John Taylor of Caroline, Arator, ed. M.E. Bradford
Eugene
D. Genovese, Roll,
Jordan, Roll, a classic work on slavery that manages to
avoid hysteria and be sympathetic to white and black Southerners
both.
Robert
W. Fogel and Stanley Engermann, Time
on the Cross, one of a number of books on the South that
have been announced to have been disproved, though they haven't
really been.
William Garrott Brown, The
Lower South in American History*
J. Steven Wilkins and Douglas Wilson, Southern
Slavery as It Was
Glover Moore, The
Missouri Controversy*
Everett Dick, The
Dixie Frontier*
Frederick L. Ogg, The
Old Northwest, on the Southerners who founded the Midwest.
For more serious students, Lewis C. Gray, Agriculture in the
Southern United States to 1860, a classic work of its kind;
and Michael O'Brien, ed., All Clever Men*, which indicates
that intellectual life in the Old South was significant and not
preoccupied with slavery.
One of the most important works in Southern history is Frank L.
Owsley's Plain
Folk of the Old South. Owsley demonstrates that the South
was not, according to abolitionist propaganda, made up of slaves,
haughty aristocrats, and degraded poor whites, but the bulk of the
people were independent farmers and stockraisers who had economic
sufficiency and a love of liberty and were not bossed by anybody.
The official stance of academic historians today is that "Owsley
has been disproved." They must say this, because if the Old South
was not as the abolitionists fancied it to be, desire for independence
cannot be discredited and its invasion and destruction cannot be
justified. In fact, Owsley has not been disproved and cannot be.
The literature which might seriously challenge him does not exist.
A supplement to Owsley is Grady McWhiney's Cracker
Culture: Celtic Ways in the Old South. McWhiney does a superb
job of showing the connections between British border ways of life
and the plain folk of the Old South. Unfortunately, in order to
do this, he must use as sources the observations of puritanical
Englishmen and Yankees who were outsiders to Cracker culture, and
these observers give a highly derogatory tone to the description
of Southern plain folk. I am also dubious about the open-ended term
"Celtic." And clearly the very real phenomena described by McWhiney
do not make up all of the elements that went into the formation
of Southern society. The Low Country of Virginia and the Carolinas
did not orginate in Celtic parts of Britain, not to mention French
Louisiana.
A
realistic view of the life of the Old South, neither defensive nor
citical, appears in the literature it produced. The writers of the
Old South, in fact, were creating a real American literature while
New Englanders were turning out milksop verses and egomaniacal essays.
Johnson J. Hooper, The
Adventures of Captain Simon Suggs
(Alabama)
George W. Harris, "Sut
Lovingood" stories (Tennessee)
A.B. Longstreet, Georgia
Scenes
William Elliott, Carolina
Sports by Land and Water (ignore the PC introductiuon in
the most recent edition)
William Gilmore Simms, Paddy M'Gann
Outstanding modern novels about the Old South:
William Faulkner, Go
Down Moses. (By the way, Faulkner does not regard his protagonist,
Ike McCaslin, as a hero for refusing his bequest of slaves. He regards
him as a failure for not accepting his responsibilities.)
Caroline Gordon, Penhally
(Kentucky)
Caroline
Miller, Lamb
in His Bosom (South Georgia)
Andrew Lytle, The
Long Night (Alabama)
Perhaps the most outstanding cultural production of the Old South
was Birds
of North America by John J. Audubon of Louisiana. Audubon's
interesting journals, which give a view of American society, have
also been published. The painter George Caleb Bingham and the artist
and architect Benjamin H. Latrobe have left vivd pictures of the
Old South.
See also Jesse Poesch, Art in the Old South
Most Southern history is written as if the South is a peculiar sport
of nature that needs explaining. The implicit unexamined assumption
of the historian is that the North, or the mainstream United States,
is the universal norm against which all else is to be measured.
But what about that assumption? Maybe the South is just what it
is and does not so much need explaining as it critics. Why have
they been so preoccupied with slandering and reforming it?
In
fact, you cannot understand the conflict that led to the War of
Southern Independence unless you know something about the Old North.
It was the North that suffered a revolution in its ways of thinking
and doing. The historical path taken by the Old South is only explained
by the economic, demographic, political, and religious changes in
the North in the 19th century. It was these changes that brought
to power the elements that demanded the destruction of the South
and that reinterpreted the Constitution and the meaning of the Union.
Only recently have historians begun to look carefully at the Old
North, and some good books have appeared. If there is one certain
indisputable generalization we can make about the North in the War
and the periods before and after, it is this: The Union side NEVER
did anything with a primary motive of benevolence toward the black
population of America.
Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Emancipating
Slaves, Enslaving Free Men
Anne Norton, Alternative
Americas*
Harlow W. Sheidley, Sectional
Nationalism: Massachusetts Conservative Leaders and the Transformation
of America
Susan-Mary
Grant, North
Over South: Northern Nationalism and American Identity
Richard F. Bensel, Yankee
Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America
Ernest L. Tuveson, Redeemer
Nation
Eugene Berwanger, The
Frontier Against Slavery*
V. Jacques Voegli, Free
but Not Equal*
Howard Floan, The
South in Northern Eyes*
Edgar
Allan Poe, the South's greatest 19th century writer, despised
New Englanders, their pretensions, and their baneful influence on
American culture. In his collected essays and criticism, which can
be found in many libraries, take a look at "Boston and the Bostonians,"
"Brook Farm," and "The Literati of New York City." If you want to
know what the people who settled Boston were really like, watch
Vincent Price's Puritan witchhunter in the film "The
Conqueror Worm," which is based on a Poe story.
State
and Local History
Southerners
have historically been the most loyal to the United States and ready
to fight in its defense of all Americans. They are also the Americans
most loyal to their own region and their own states, and the most
likely to remain in their native territory. This is not paradoxical
because loyalty is an indivisible quality of character. Their loyalty
makes Southerners natural enemies of those powerful Americans who
are not loyal to their people or country but to the government and
the "propositions" it allegedly represents.
State
histories, histories of regions within Southern states, and even
county histories are abundant and many are quite good. The older
state histories, which were used as textbooks in better days, are
superior to the current ones drawn up to federal regulations. I
can cite only a few outstanding examples.
John
Gould Fletcher, Arkansas.
Fletcher was a poet and one of the Twelve Agrarians.
Grace
King, New Orleans: The Place and the People*. Grace King
was a Louisiana writer whose novels and stories are better than
her contemporary and currently celebrated feminist Kate Chopin.
See also King's fiction Balcony
Stories.*
T.R.
Fehrenbacher, Lone
Star: A History of Texas and the Texans.
J.
Evetts Haley is best known as the author of A
Texan Looks at Lyndon. He was also a very fine historian
of the Texas cattle kingdom in Charles
Goodnight: Cowman and Plainsman, Jeff Milton: A Good
Man with a Gun, and a number of other works.
In
a few earlier listings and those that follow, states and subregions
that the work reflects will be mentioned in parens.
After
Reconstruction
For
the period of Southern history from the end of Reconstruction until
World War I, the works of C. Vann Woodward cannot be avoided, particularly
Origins
of the New South, American
Counterpoint, and Tom
Watson, Agrarian Rebel. Woodward was a native Southerner
who was negative about nearly everything that Southerners hold dear
and highly successful at it. But the works mentioned remain interesting
because Woodward, while he criticized the South, did not accept
the moral pretensions of the North. He was a good writer who was
capable of an ironic detachment from American as well as Southern
mythology.
Other
Woodward works, Reunion
and Reaction, The
Strange Career of Jim Crow, and The
Burden of Southern History need no longer be read. They
are exercises tailored perfectly to appeal to the leftist mentality
at a particular point in time, and their ideas have been shown to
be of doubtful validity. Woodward, alas, left a large company of
talented PhD students, most of them renegade Southerners from well-to-do
families, who have managed to take over and distort many of the
areas of major interest to students of the South.
For
a pre-Woodward view, see Holland M. Thompson, The
New South*.
Booker
T. Washington, Up
From Slavery
Elizabeth
Alston Pringle, A
Woman Rice Planter
As
always, the best view of this period is given by the South's creative
writers:
Thomas
Nelson Page, In
Ole Virginia and The
Burial of the Guns
William
Faulkner, The
Reivers and Intruder
in the Dust (Mississippi)
Owen
Wister, Lady
Baltimore (Charleston)
Charles
Henry Smith, "Bill Arp" Stories and Sketches* which have
appeared in several editions (North Georgia)
Joel
Chandler Harris's stories of "Uncle Remus." These stories are
of course no longer in favor. Uncle Remus was as wise, kind, and
honorable as anyone in literature and therefore not a good role
model. (Middle Georgia)
The
South: Twentieth Century and Beyond
Historical writing about the 20th century South suffers from the
general characteristics of such writing in the second half of that
century: leftism masquerading as professional objectivity, and the
blindness of over-specialization. There is a vast literature, some
of it good within its own terms, some not. But we want works for
the reader in search of real, humane knowledge and understanding.
The writings cited in the first section above, "General Works,"
make for a good start.
Modern
Southern Literature
Southern literature in the 20th century is the marvel of the world
and probably the most lasting cultural acheivement of the U.S. Literature
begins with language and that subject begins with The
Language of the American South* by the great literary scholar
and critic Cleanth Brooks. Southern speech has always attracted
attention and Brooks knows where it comes from. A few years ago
there was a PBS television series on the English language put together
by a humorless, pseudo-intellectual Canadian. It was wrong about
nearly everything. According to this production, there is no such
thing as a Southern accent since it was never mentioned. There was
a variety of English from the South which originated with one particular
isolated black group.
Then
there was a general American accent. The segment about this included
people who kept insisting they spoke Southern, which they obviously
did, though according to the series such a form of English does
not exist! Apparently U.S. Grant and Bedford Forrest talked just
alike, as do Bob Dole and Strom Thurmond. Brooks knows the origin
and significance of Southern speech and he is backed up by the specialized
works of the late Prof. Raven McDavid of the University of Chicago.
McDavid was the premier authority on American speech and a native
of South Carolina.
Works
on Southern Literature:
Jay B. Hubbell, The
South in American Literature
Cleanth
Brooks, William
Faulkner: The Yoknapatawpha Country
M.E. Bradford, Generations
of the Faithful Heart and Against
the Barbarians
Mark R. Winchell, Cleanth
Brooks and the Rise of Modern Criticism and Where
No Flag Flies: Donald Davidson and the Southern Resistance
Donald Davidson, Southern
Writers in the Modern World
Political
and Social Commentary:
J. Evetts Haley, A Texan Looks at Lincoln
Works
of Ronald and Donald Kennedy previously cited
Thomas Fleming, The
Politics of Human Nature
Gordon Thornton, The
Southern Nation: The New Rise of the Old South
Oran P. Smith, ed., So
Good a Cause
Eugene D. Genovese, The
Southern Tradition
Ted J. Smith, ed., Steps
Toward Restoration
Joseph Scotchie, The
Vision of Richard Weaver
Memoirs:
Ben Robertson, Red
Hills and Cotton (upcountry South Carolina)
Marjorie Kennan Rawlings, Cross
Creek (northern Florida; avoid the horrible movie version.)
John Graves, Hard
Scrabble and Goodbye
to a River (East Texas)
Zora Neal Hurston, Dust
Tracks on a Road (African-American)
Essays:
Literary and Social Commentary:
William Faulkner, Essays,
Speeches, and Public Letters
Robert
Penn Warren, The
Legacy of the Civil War
Andrew Lytle, From
Eden to Babylon
John Donald Wade, Selected Essays*
Allen Tate, Essays
of Four Decades
Flannery O'Connor, Mystery
and Manners
Works of M.E. Bradford and Richard Weaver already cited
George Garrett, My
Silk Purse and Yours and Sorrows
of Fat City
Walker Percy, Lost
in the Cosmos
Wendell
Berry, What
Are People For? and other works
Florence King, Reflections
in a Jaundiced Eye and The
Florence King Reader
Tom Wolfe, Hooking
Up
H.W.
Crocker III, Robert
E. Lee on Leadership
Fiction
and Poetry:
Here we enter the realm of taste. Not being a literary critic, my
taste runs to creative literature that conveys with verity the life
of the South, and not that which may be judged by the world as the
greatest. I have already mentioned many of the best, by my rule,
in appropriate sections above. Undoubtedly, there is a vast collection
of good Southern writers and books to choose from, and they are
still coming. Other books by the writers suggested below and books
by other writers are just as good.
Flannery
O'Connor, Collected
Stories (Georgia)
Fred Chappell, I
am One of You Forever, Brighten
the Corner Where You Are, Farewell,
I'm Bound to Leave You, Look
Back All the Green Valley, and Midquest
(western North Carolina)
Wendell Berry, Memory
of Old Jack and Jayber
Crow (Kentucky)
Tito Perdue, Lee, The
New Austerities and Opportunities
in Alabama Agriculture
George Garrett, The
King of Babylon Shall Not Come Against You (modern Florida).
Garrett's
Elizabethan novels, Death
of the Fox and The
Succession are not strictly about the South, but they are
masterpieces set in the English world out of which the first Southerners
came.
Walker
Percy, The
Second Coming, Love
in the Ruins, and others (Louisiana)
Donald
Davidson, Big
Ballad Jamboree (country music)
James E. Kibler, Poems from Scorched Earth (South Carolina)
James
Lee Burke, in a whole series of novels about Detective Robicheaux
in the Louisiana Cajun country has raised crime fiction to the level
of serious literature for the first time since Poe. Burke is also
the author of a fine Southern "Western," Two
For Texas.
Cormac McCarthy, a Southern writer, has produced a classic "Western"
trilogy: All
the Pretty Horses, Cities
of the Plain, and The
Crossing.
Other
Southern novels set in "the West": Charles Portis, True
Grit (Arkansas and Oklahoma) and Alan LeMay, The
Searchers (Texas), both of which became John Wayne vehicles.
Then
there is the saga of the Alabama writer Forrest Carter, friend and
supporter of Governor George Wallace, who wrote the book Gone
to Texas upon which Clint Eastwood's "The
Outlaw Josey Wales" was based. Carter also wrote The
Education of Little Tree, about the sufferings of an Indian
boy at the hands of puritanical authorities. The book was reprinted
by the devotedly multicultural University of New Mexico Press and
became celebrated in Native American studies. Any reader other than
an American intellectual could see right away that the book is really
about the persecution of Southerners by Yankees. Imagine the consternation
when Carter's background was revealed! (The movie version became
anti-Southern, of course.)
The
history of the Southwest (and to some extent the Northwest) is the
history of extending the South into new territory. Without Southerners,
the West is just a boring account of sodbusters, railroads, and
cavalry. But that is a story for another time. Meanwhile, if you
wish, you have a lifetime of satisfying learning before you.
July
9, 2001
Dr.
Wilson [send him mail]
is professor of history at the University of South Carolina and
editor of The
Papers of John C. Calhoun.
Copyright
© 2001 LewRockwell.com
|