If this country ever returns to the sturdy principles
of liberty and republican virtue on which it was
founded, then today, Thomas Jefferson's birthday, should
be a national holiday. I suggest this despite the fact
that when some good citizens of Boston sought to do
precisely that, he refused to tell them his birthday,
saying he did not approve of "transferring the honors
and veneration for the great birthday of our Republic to
any individual."
But Tom Jefferson was eminently practical, in theory
and interests if not always in practice (he tried so
hard to be scientific, but he was a terrible farmer),
and at this late hour he might see utility in such a
holiday. Perhaps it would be merely an occasion for
department stores to have white sales. But if it
inspired only a few to dip into Thomas Jefferson's
writings and to ponder the legacy he strove to leave to
this country, it would be worth it.
It has been fashionable of late, beginning with
Joseph Ellis, to debunk Jefferson - thoughtfully,
regretfully and with respect, of course, but with
purpose - as a hypocrite on the issue of slavery, as a
politician who didn't practice what he preached, as a
clay-footed human rather than a marble statue to be
venerated. That's fine. Jefferson, although he had a
personal reserve that left a certain mystery about who
he really was, is more valuable to posterity as an
imperfect human being than as a marble statue.
What rankles modern intellectuals about Jefferson is
that he distrusted concentrated power with every fiber
of his being, and most modern intellectuals worship
concentrated power and seek to serve it - to make it
constructive and refined and sensitive, of course, but
to celebrate political power rather than to decimate it
or even to question it.
Worse, Jefferson was no backwoods yahoo spouting this
retrograde nonsense, although he got along with yahoos
and saved his scorn for those ambitious for power.
"Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on offices," he
noted, "a rottenness begins in his conduct." He was
perhaps the most cultivated, civilized American of his
era, and he wrote, "I predict future happiness for
Americans if they can prevent the government from
wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them."
Of course he needs to be taken down a few pegs, lest
people take his ideas seriously again.
If only.
Jefferson thought deeply and profoundly about the
role of government but put it simply and elegantly in
the Declaration of Independence. After declaring that we
are all endowed by our creator with inalienable rights,
including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, he
turns to government's purpose. "That to secure these
Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, and
that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive
of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or
abolish it."
The purpose of government is to secure our
inalienable rights. Not to feed us, clothe us, medicate
us, control us, lead us in worship, look after our
mental health or - perish the thought! - to nibble away
at our rights and freedoms and expand its own power. The
sole legitimate function of government is to secure our
rights. When it fails to do so it ceases to be
legitimate and the people have the right to take matters
(back) into their own hands.
This doctrine is profoundly revolutionary, placing
the individual person at the center with the state
conceived as servant rather than master. It was close to
conventional wisdom among American colonists who had
decided to break with Great Britain. But it is difficult
to imagine anyone else phrasing it so well as Jefferson
did.
That radical simplicity makes Jefferson profoundly
subversive today, when the original republic has become
a megastate with imperial pretensions. I suspect he
would be quietly pleased to be seen in this light.
A nation whose dominant party wants to make the
intrusive USA Patriot Act permanent would do well to
ponder this: "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action
according to our will within limits drawn around us by
the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the
law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and
always so when it violates the rights of the
individual."
Jefferson despised politics yet served two terms as
president, during which he negotiated the Louisiana
Purchase and sent Marines to root out the Barbary
Pirates. Inconsistent? A bit. But he also paid down most
of the national debt, cut spending, cut taxes, abolished
agencies, reduced the size of the military and eschewed
patronage. "We have set a good example" was the closest
he came to boasting. It didn't take, but that would not
have surprised him.
"A government regulating itself by what is just and
wise for the many, uninfluenced by the local and selfish
views of the few who direct their affairs," he believed,
"has not been seen, perhaps, on Earth. Or if it existed
for a moment at the birth of ours, it would not be easy
to fix the term of its continuance."
An idealistic realist, a paragon of taste and
manners, the man who said "I have sworn on the altar of
God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over
the mind of man" deserves to be celebrated, now more
than ever.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Thomas Jefferson primer
Born:
April 13, 1743
Died:
July 4, 1826 (same day as John Adams)
Education:
College of William and Mary
Posts:
Governor of Virginia, 1779-1781; U.S. secretary of
state, 1789-1793; U.S. president,
1801-1809