The 'Save America Plan' 54,376 and It Will Be Self-Funding!
by
Gary North
by Gary North
Recently by Gary North: Bill
Bonner's Big Idea
I got this
in my email box today: spam.
This spam proposes
a way to change America. It begins with a preposterous premise:
the Marxists have taken over the American media since 1999.
The Marxist
Left has spent nearly ¾ of a billion dollars on anti-American
propaganda in the last decade and we need to do *something* to
counter this outright war on the American people. To that end,
[SPAMMER] is directly asking the American people whether they
would support a grass-roots media project to expand the conservative
presence in broadcast media.
We put up
a new website explaining the extent of this propaganda attack
on the US and how we propose, with the support of the American
public, to create a new radio and television broadcast network
dedicated to getting greater exposure for the principles this
country was founded on.
We're not
asking for anything except comments on whether the public would
support the idea. Whether the project will go forward depends
on what feedback we get from the public about it.
Marxists spent
$750,000,000. Right. These are the guys who could not raise enough
money to keep The Daily Worker in print. It died in 1991,
the year the USSR died.
I know. I know.
The Communists were not the true Marxists. The true Marxists are
invisible and unnamed and had $750,000,000 to invest.
By the way,
$750,000,000 in a decade is chump change. Americans spend over
$350 billion a year on higher education, and 95% of this funds
the Left. The rest funds engineering.
Add to this
K-12 spending per year: $970
billion.
Then factor
in what the TV networks spend.
But the spammer
thinks a new radio and TV network will turn things around.
Did you ever
wonder why conservatives are regarded as aluminum foil hat stylists?
THE SECRET
PLAN
For 45 years,
I have been told that there is a secret plan to take over America.
It is just about completed.
America got
taken over no later than 1893 after Grover Cleveland's final
months in office. Some of us think it was earlier. Much earlier.
"Politically incorrect even for conservatives" earlier.
See my report.
Anyway, everyone
who proposes The Latest Plan To Save America assumes that he has
discovered what no other conservative has seen in the past (say)
130 years. He assumes that he has a way to overturn the Secret Plan.
All he needs is money. Or donated time.
Has anyone
ever heard of these people? Their wives. Or ex-wives.
Have they started
an organization? Has it stayed solvent for 1020 years?
Is there a
record of one major success? I don't mean a success like stopping
the ERA. That was the only big one the conservatives have had in
50 years. I mean a success like winning a Federal court case or
getting a piece of legislation passed in some state.
No.
Then why should
we take them seriously?
Why do they
have The Secret Plan to Defeat the Secret Plan that for 50 years,
or 130 years, gifted conservatives have not seen? Why should this
plan work?
If it's a centralized
plan, it's leftist. It's another top-down, twist arms, centralized
power solution. Avoid it.
If it's decentralized,
then why not post The Latest Plan on the Web and see if anyone implements
it?
But no. It
must be secret. It must be By Invitation Only. It is like the other
side's Secret Plan.
For 45 years,
I have been invited to "get in on this nation-saving deal on
the ground floor."
Pardon me for
my skepticism. I am too old for this. Try it on some kid.
Anyone old
enough with money enough to fund The Latest Plan has been hit 1,000
times with similar proposals. They all have one thing in common.
They did not work. I know. I have funded several of my own. Not
one of them matches what Matt Drudge did in 1998.
Who
was Matt Drudge? He had no money. He had no secret plan. He had
only this: (1) a tip that Newsweek had spiked a story about Clinton
and an unnamed intern; (2) a Web site. That was all it took.
Ideas have
consequences. Secret plans to expose secret plans don't.
Send a donation
to an outfit with a public plan that you like. The plan won't save
the world in the next 10 or 20 years, but it may inflict a bit of
damage on bad guys, or help good guys a little.
The next time
you hear about The Secret Plan good or evil recall
North's law of successful politics:
You can't
fight city hall, but you can pee on the steps and run.
August
14, 2009
Gary
North [send him mail] is the
author of Mises
on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com.
He is also the author of a free 20-volume series, An
Economic Commentary on the Bible.
Copyright ©
2009 Gary North
The
Best of Gary North
|