As a trained
historian, I am interested in lots of major events in history that
served as national or worldwide turning points. I ask the following
2. How do we know what happened?
3. What led up to the event?
4. How did the government report the event?
5. How did it subsequently explain the event?
6. How did the major media handle the government's explanation?
7. Who has benefited from the event?
8. Who has benefited from the official government explanation?
9. What are the alternative explanations?
10. Who would benefit if any of them became widely accepted?
These are all
legitimate questions. The toughest one to answer is #1. You might
not think that this is the case, but it is.
the collapse of the North tower, the second to collapse.
does not notice the steel pillar. The person who edited the video
added a call-out to show us what the narrator missed. The narrator
was watching the falling building. He did not notice the pillar
and its strange disappearance.
seems to disintegrate into dust. In any case, it does not topple.
It falls straight down.
There are extended
debates over what happened to the non-New York City planes. Where
is the wreckage?
Here is the
problem: there is no agreement about what happened. Where there
is evidence of unexplainable events, the information does not get
out. Only because of video sites has this ignored information reached
a small segment of the population.
OF A 9-11 PROJECT
If a rich person
or organization gave me a large amount of money to investigate 9-11,
what would I do with it?
I would hire a lawyer to see what control the donor would have over
the results. If I trusted him, I would advise him to set up the
funding from a trust on the Isle of Man. That is because I would
assume that the results would be damaging to the U.S. government
and representatives of the government on 9-11.
I would hire two or three programmers skilled at creating interactive
Wikipedia-type sites. These sites would be the central resources
of the project.
The most important
resource for comprehending 9-11 (or any other complex historical
event) is the division of labor. Wikis are the chief tools of this
process. Wikipedia has taught us this.
I would begin
with two sites: (1) a timeline site; (2) an engineering site. I
would ask for submissions on two topics: (1) when did each part
of the sequence take place? (3) What could not have taken place
according to physics?
I would not
ask how 9-11 was organized or why. I would ask only when events
happened, where they happened, and what could not possibly have
these two sites? To shut down rabbit trails.