Don’t Use the 'N' Word….Please!
by
Justine Nicholas
by Justine Nicholas
DIGG THIS
When it comes
to legislative action (Is that an oxymoron?), the work of New York’s
City Council (Is that another oxymoron?) may not be any more arcane,
intrusive or simply silly than that of any other group of municipal
lawmakers. However, this week the City Council did something (yet
another oxymoron?) that defies even the shakiest logic and the lowest
common denominator of sense.
My city’s august
legislative body passed a resolution that – are you ready for this?
– symbolically
bans the use of the "N" word.
Now, you might
say that because the legislation is symbolic, there’s no reason
to worry about it. Well, as we all know, sometimes symbols can be
powerful. As a libertarian, I am offended at an attempt, however
unrealizable, at restricting free speech. Also, as someone who has
seen that something done voluntarily as a result of enlightenment
is better than something that someone was forced to do, I am appalled
at the lack of common sense and insulted at the cynicism behind
such a vote. Finally, as someone who’s practical at least some of
the time, I am annoyed that a group funded by my taxes is spending
its time in such a way.
Now, I’m not
the sort of person who uses the "N" word or other ethnic
slurs. A longtime friend recently told me that he’s never even heard
me use any of The Seven Words You Can’t Say on TV. As a lady of
education and refinement (Someone’s snickering, I’m sure.), I have
no need and certainly no wish to use them. At the same time, I don’t
think that I or anyone else has the right to prevent someone
else from using them. On those rare occasions when an acquaintance
uses such terms or indulges in stereotypes, I let him or her know
how I feel. An apology invariably follows and we move on: Each of
us respects each other’s sentiments and, at the same time, our right
to express them.
Such moments
also give me the opportunity to explain why the slurs and curses
are upsetting. The "N" word has a particularly ugly history
and nasty connotations, and as someone who is committed to promoting
peace, I don’t want to add to whatever spiritual violence already
exists in this world. That is the reason I don’t accept the argument
that if rappers use the word or young black men call each other
that name, it must be OK. If I follow that line of reasoning, I
can justify shooting people who shoot each other. Is that sort of
rationalization any different from the one that’s used to justify
intervention in the unrest of a nation that poses no threat to us?
I know others
who share my ideals; none of us were inculcated with them through
legislation. Our respect for other people is, rather, a product
of our upbringings or other experiences we’ve had. Still other people
eschew prejudice because of their religious beliefs. Although I
am not religious, I think that faith is a much more solid basis
for tolerance than legislative fiat could ever be.
Speaking of
which: Although the ban is symbolic, I can’t help to wonder how
on earth anyone could enforce a prohibition on using the "N"
word. Save perhaps for a few white supremacist websites and publications
and some rappers and other popular entertainers, nobody uses the
word publicly anymore. And those who use the word usually do so
only for an audience of like-minded people. So would the intent
of a ban be to restrict what people say in private conversations?
If so, how exactly would that be accomplished? Even if a government
were to bug people’s homes and workplaces as well as streets and
other public areas, it couldn’t drive all offensive speech underground.
So, even though
there is no bite behind the bark, it should be cause for concern
that legislators think that they can use the tail of legislation
to wag the dog of people’s behavior. As we have seen, that approach
only works on people who weren’t going to engage in the prohibited
behavior anyway. Legislation cannot substitute for education.
Besides,
do you really want to get an earful from someone like me? If not,
don’t use the "N" word….please. Thank you.
March
5, 2007
Justine
Nicholas [send her mail]
teaches English at the City University of New York.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Justine
Nicholas Archives
|