Libertarians at Fox?
by
Justine Nicholas
by Justine Nicholas
DIGG THIS
When you live
long enough, you think, say and do things what would’ve horrified
you, or what simply would’ve seemed implausible, in your younger
days.
That’s what
happened to me the other day: I found myself grateful for the Faux,
I mean Fox, network!
How did I,
who teach English in a public university and live in New York –
and who once took pride in not owning a TV set – come to praising
the folks who foisted the likes of Bill O’ Reilly on us?
On Tuesday
– yes, the fifth anniversary of 9/11 – I came home a bit later than
usual from work. Feeling tired, I had no wish to engage in any of
the constructive things I could’ve and should’ve been doing. So
I turned on the TV.
With every
button I touched on my remote control, I got the same result: George
the W offering up his usual assertions without explanations of how
9/11 justifies our involvement in Iraq and other parts of the Middle
East.
We’ve heard
it all before. That he chose to offer it up to grieving family members
was, well, par for the course. (What does it say when such obtuseness
is no longer shocking?) I didn’t need to hear it, so I continued
to jab at the remote.
Finally,
I found my escape: Prison
Break.
I’ve probably
seen every episode of it since it first aired. Right now, it’s the
only show I watch with such regularity. I’m not enough of a fan
of any show to videotape whatever I miss; Prison Break takes
my loyalties about as far as they’ll go for a TV program.
Anyway, after
thanking my lucky stars for Fox (!), I had another one of those
thoughts that would’ve jangled my jejune vision: I had – at least,
in a way – become like my father!
Watching Prison
Break brought me realize that in a way, I was reenacting one
of his rituals. Just as I’ve managed to be in front of a TV screen
every Tuesday at 9:00 pm, my father always took his place in our
den every Sunday night at 8:00 pm. That was when The FBI
aired. I don’t think he missed a single episode: quite a feat in
those days before VCRs.
From 1965 until
1974, Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. played Inspector Lewis Erskine. He was
the humorless (and seemingly libido-less), dutiful agent who nearly
always got his man (or, on rare occasion, woman) and never seemed
to encounter anything that seriously threatened to keep him from
solving his cases.
The show was
essentially an advertisement for the agency, and until he died in
1972, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover was said to have had the final
say on every script, casting decision and camera shot. He would
not allow Bette Davis, Robert Blake and others on whom he had files
to appear on the show. W. Mark Felt, who only last year revealed
himself to be "Deep Throat" in the Watergate cover-up,
was then an associate director at the agency and served as a technical
advisor for the series.
The FBI
appealed to men of my father’s generation: the last ones before
the Baby Boomers, who were just old enough to remember but too young
to serve in World War II or the Korean conflict. They came of age
during the 1950’s, when almost everyone, whatever his or her political
affiliations, did not question the size or scope of government and
did not challenge the authority of its agents.
By the time
The FBI aired, this country was immersed in the Vietnam War,
and people – mostly young – had begun to oppose it, sometimes violently.
People of my father’s generation, whatever they thought of the protesters,
longed for what seemed to be a simpler time: one in which most people
trusted authority, or at least never questioned it. In that world
– and of The FBI – those who disobeyed the rules set by authority
figures would be found, caught and duly punished.
But the world
(and, in some ways, my father) changed. That is part of the appeal
of a show like Prison Break. Here’s something that would
have shocked my father and me back in The FBI days: I actually
root for the escapees! Other people I know – some of whom are law-and-order
conservatives to an even greater degree than my father has ever
been – have the same reaction.
In Prison
Break, Fox (!) River State Penitentiary inmate Lincoln Burrows
(played by Dominic Purcell) is on death row for a murder his brother
Michael Scofield (Wentworth Miller) is convinced he didn’t commit.
Scofield robs a bank to get himself incarcerated alongside his brother.
While in prison, Scofield, a structural engineer by trade who just
happens to have blueprints of the prison, hatches an elaborate plan
to get his brother out of prison and prove that he was the victim
of an elaborate conspiracy. To help carry out his scheme, Scofield
gets the details on various aspects of prison life from Senior Correction
Officer Bellick (Wade Williams) and with the help of cellmate Sucre
(Amaury Nolasco) aligns himself with a wildly disparate group of
inmates. On the outside, Scofield has one ally: his longtime friend
and former defense attorney, Veronica Donovan (Robin Tunney), who
also just happens to be an old girlfriend of Burrows.
Several episodes
have elapsed since Burrows and Scofield escaped. One wonders how
long they can remain on the lam. Will they someday become modern
versions of Jean Valjean (in Les
Miserables) and settle into communities where no one knows
of their past? Or will they be captured – dead or alive? Of course,
if the latter happens, the series ends.
So one has
to root for what, in Erskine’s day, we would’ve called the "bad
guys" if we want the show to continue. I, personally, would
like to see the escapees remain on the outside if the show were
to give greater depth to their characters and show them, ŕ la
Valjean, as men capable of doing good and doing well.
But there is
another reason why viewers like me pull for Scofield and Burrows,
however improbable their stories seem. Their characters are, in
many ways, much more sympathetic than those of the warden, guards
and other government representatives. The state employees come off
as smug or stupid, or both, while Scofield is portrayed as intelligent,
educated and bonded to his brother, who may be an unwilling dupe.
And, Scofield and Burrows, as well as some of the other inmates
are simply better looking than those who keep them in captivity
Although I
am not about to say that Prison Break is high art, the aspect
of the show I’ve mentioned makes me think, fleetingly, of John Milton’s
Paradise Lost. Poet William Blake, who read the epic poem
more than a century after Milton’s death, said that its author was
"of the devil’s party without knowing it." In other words,
Milton made the rebel outlaw – Satan – much more interesting and
complex, and in some ways appealing, than God.
In contrast,
on The FBI, Inspector Erskine was always better dressed and
groomed (and, most of the time, handsomer) than the men he pursued.
He also spoke more grammatically and intelligently, and drove newer
cars (always Fords, from the show’s chief commercial sponsor) than
the perps. And, his lack of emotion extended to a seeming lack of
malice, hatred or envy. That, I suppose, is how most people viewed
government and law enforcement at that time. I can’t think of a
single great work of Western art or literature in which doubt of
superiority of, or inevitable victory by, the most powerful authority
figure was never in question.
Maybe
Fox is onto something. As for The FBI and George W, I will
not miss them if I never see them again. My father and I talk every
week. He watches Prison Break, too. As the author of Les
Miserables wrote: "Plus ca change, plus la meme chose."
I’ll tune in
again next week.
September
15, 2006
Justine
Nicholas [send her mail]
teaches English at the City University of New York.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Justine
Nicholas Archives
|