Fighting
Notes from an Enfettered Isle
by
Alexander
Moseley
by Alexander Moseley
I’m
supposed to be finishing a conference paper on John Locke’s theory
of war for the University of Hull, but I’m so distracted by the
news that keeps coming in of hunt supporters rebelling against Blair’s
backbenchers who are seeking to ban hunting with hounds – hardly
a chapter goes by without finding something relevant in Johnny Locket.
For
instance, Locke continually insists that the only justification
for war is that of self-defence and only against an aggressor who
violates or attacks one’s life, liberty, and/or property. There
is no distinguishing between the three values for Locke – an attack
on one’s property is as vile as an attack on one’s body.
The
hunting community are suffering from an attack against all three
values. The ban will directly throw thousands out of work; it prohibits
humans from engaging in a natural act of ridding pests and vermin
from their property, and it thusly and thirdly denies rights of
usage to the owners’ land.
Last
week eight brave supporters got into the House of Commons and protested.
Predictably, socialist and ‘activist’ Labour MPs branded the freedom-fighters
as ‘thugs’ – the same MPs had won their own socialist credentials
in marches, protests, and sit-downs for more welfare dosh from the
taxpayer of course.
Hunts
are self-financing and independent and the government likes them
not!
Today,
a top Blairbuddy is being held at his home by Welsh hunters – men
and women from the mining valleys, who are as far removed from the
caricature of the ‘hunting English toff classes’ as you can get.
These men and women do not mince their values. At one book signing
last year, I spoke to an ex-mining and hunting Welshman. He told
me that they wouldn’t put up with any of those balaclavared animal
rights hunt saboteurs – "We’d leave them in the ditches, and they
know that – that’s why they don’t bother with us." And besides,
wearing the hoods and balaclavas – "well, you wouldn’t know who
you’d hit, would you?"
In
my novel, Wither This
Land, the hunting community kidnap a Minister to show him what
it’s like to have his liberties taken away. I’ve sold the book to
many of the top people in the Countryside Alliance and Countryside
Action Network, although I don’t think my story has influenced present
proceedings, rather it has predicted them. Nonetheless, fact and
fiction have converged eerily over the past year and even anti-hunting
acquaintances have had to think twice about our political drift.
There
is a growing bubble of frustration and anger in the country, which
I picked up on in the novel, and since publication I’ve been banging
on doors to get the book greater distribution and coverage. But
it’s difficult with a left-leaning literary establishment that would
be more entertained by stories of gay repression in Thatcher’s Britain
than a nation being split apart by political correctness and being
sold by the pound by euro-philes and philistine bendy-wendy spin-doctors
smoothing the brains of the nation with GM-free gloss paint.
Reading
Locke, I find that "hunting delighted him" – good man! – but more
importantly, we find a reasonable and coherent defence of liberty,
livelihood and property, which is sorely required in my once somewhat
free country. The ban on hunting affects people’s rights, and it
is strongly rumoured that Prince Charles would leave the country
for other hunting fields should a ban be passed. In that light,
Locke’s comments on invading the rights of the princes or people
distract me further! "I am sure," writes Locke, "whoever ... by
force goes about to invade the Rights of either Prince or People,
and lays the foundation for overturning the Constitution and Frame
of any Just Government, is guilty of the greatest Crime, I think,
a Man is capable of, being to answer for all those mischiefs of
Blood, Rapine, and Desolation, which the breaking to pieces of Governments
bring on a Countrey. And he who does it, is justly to be esteemed
the common Enemy and Pest of Mankind; and is to be treated accordingly."
(Second
Treatise, §418)
So
one Minister is held ‘hostage’ by hunt supporters. Another – the
slimy Alun Michael (strongly resembling Minister for Rural Affairs
Alan Jones in my novel) – cowardly backed out of a meeting last
week to ‘celebrate’ to so-called ‘right to roam’ Act, which permits
anyone to wander freely across farmers’ lands – lands which the
government says the owners will not be allowed to hunt on. A potential
protest prompted his quick withdrawal. Maybe he had heard of the
kidnap plan ...
More
is being planned – and I hope to get to some of the demonstrations
in my area. The government’s taken on the countryside, the landowners,
hunting miners, country sports enthusiasts, the majority of the
press, the monarchy, and human rights acts. We’ll see how far this
political suicide continues – after all, in 1974, the miners brought
down the socialist Conservative Government of Edward Heath, may
be the Hunts can bring down the warmonger Blair and his class-war
activists.
Tally
ho!
September
28, 2004
Alexander
Moseley [send him
mail] has lectured and tutored in American, Canadian and British
Universities. He spent the last two years sampling the State-run
comprehensive system in the UK and now teaches privately. He and
his fiancée have formed a partnership, Classical Foundations,
to teach music and other subjects privately one-to-one in their
area. Dr. Moseley is an avid exponent of the ideals Rothbard outlines
in his Education:
Free & Compulsory. He is the author of A
Philosophy of War and the novel Wither
This Land.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Alexander
Moseley Archives
|