For those of you who believe that government regulates too much, you are wrong, wrong, wrong, according to the editors of the New York Times, who believe that the “ideologues” who have controlled the EPA have not done enough to destroy the economy.

They cite a recent “eloquent” letter written by a couple of Republicans who headed EPA earlier in which they cite that EPA can do wondrous things like make us “energy independent” and give us better weather:

Last week, two prominent moderate Republicans — William K. Reilly, who ran the E.P.A. under President George H.W. Bush, and William D. Ruckelshaus, who served as administrator under both Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan — sent a little-noticed but eloquent letter to President-elect Barack Obama.

The gist of the letter was that the E.P.A. could be an enormously positive force in the fight against climate change and oil dependency. All it needed was someone who believed in its mission and was prepared to use the laws already on the books. Granting California its waiver, carrying out the Supreme Court decision, regulating emissions from vehicles and power plants — all this and more, they wrote, could be accomplished with the statutory tools at hand.

This exhortation from two veterans of the environmental wars was designed to encourage not only Mr. Obama, but also Lisa Jackson, the woman he has chosen to run the agency. It was also, however, an arrow aimed at the ideologues who have been running the agency for the last half-dozen years — and a lament for how little they have done with the weapons Congress gave them.

I think that “weapons” is an appropriate term here, as the EPA has been at war with people for many years, condemning some to poverty and others to prison. Indeed, this tells me that the real ideologues are those work at the Times.