Pet “Pollution”? Better Call PETA

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

EAT A DOG*, SAVE THE EARTH

SUVs owners are often castigated by treehuggers for their Earth-unfriendly lifestyle. A new book argues that pets are just as bad. New Zealand authors Robert and Brenda Vale’s book, “Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living” is an exhaustive analysis of the environmental impact of common pets such as cats and dogs. The authors studied the carbon emissions created by pets, including the ingredients in their food and the land required to grow it. And the results don’t bode well for Fido, who compares poorly to that SUV.

…a Toyota Land Cruiser driven a modest 10,000 kilometers a year, uses 55.1 gigajoules, which includes the energy required both to fuel and to build it. One hectare of land can produce approximately 135 gigajoules of energy per year, so the Land Cruiser’s eco-footprint is about 0.41 hectares — less than half that of a medium-sized dog.

The authors aren’t really arguing that we should eat our pets of course, merely that we need to think more about the ecological impact of the things we do on a daily basis, and how we choose to use land.

Great. Just what animal shelters need—more unadoptable dogs and cats because sheeple will believe that it’s not environmentally friendly to have a pet.
_______________________________
*Anyone have a good recipe for German Shepherd’s Pie?

7:09 am on October 25, 2009
  • LRC Blog

  • LRC Podcasts