Off With His Head!
by
William S. Lind
by William S. Lind
On the surface,
the question raised by six (at last count) retired generals of whether
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld should resign has an obvious
answer: of course he should. He was a key man in the cabal that
lied us into the war in Iraq, and he may have been the key man in
losing that war. What happens to the COO of a major corporation
who swindles his company into a risky deal, then blows the deal
so the company faces bankruptcy? In today’s business world he probably
pops his golden parachute and leaves with $100 million. But at least
he does leave. So should Rumsfeld. Off with his head!
At that
point, the picture grows murkier. Who replaces him? Almost certainly,
someone no different. He is, after all, the COO, and this company’s
problem is that it has a dunce for a CEO. Far from learning any
lessons from the previous failed venture, he wants to repeat it,
this time in Iran. A fish rots from the head, as the old Russian
saying goes, and until this head falls the rot will spread. Where
is the Queen of Hearts when we really need her?
Then there
is the question of why so many generals (not all of them retired)
want Rummy gone. That varies general to general, but when Rumsfeld’s
defenders argue that some of his critics are dinosaurs who resent
"Transformation" because it disrupts business as usual,
they have a point. As anyone who has dealt with the higher ranks
of the U.S. military knows, they put the La Brea tar pits in the
shade as a dinosaur graveyard. As wedded to old ways of doing things
– Second Generation war to be specific – as any other group of senior
Gosplan apparatchiki, they hate any hint of change. Years ago, when
an unconventional Air Force Chief of Staff had me give my Fourth
Generations of Modern War talk to the Air Force’s "Corona"
gathering of three- and four-stars, I felt like Milton Friedman
speaking to the Brezhnev Politburo.
But here
too the story is not so simple. While Rumsfeldian "Transformation"
represents change, it represents change in the wrong direction.
Instead of attempting to move from the Second Generation to the
Third (much less the Fourth), Transformation retains the Second
Generation’s conception of war as putting firepower on targets while
trying to replace people with technology. Its summa is the
Death Star, where men and women in spiffy uniforms sit in air-conditioned
comfort zapping enemies like bugs. It is a vision of future war
that appeals to technocrats and lines industry pockets, but has
no connection to reality. The combination of this vision of war
with an equally unrealistic vision of strategic objectives has given
us the defeat in Iraq. Again, Rumsfeld lies at the heart of both.
But, again, his removal and replacement contain no promise of improvement
in either.
At least
one of Rumsfeld’s retired general critics, Greg Newbold, understands
all this. I’ve known and respected Greg since he was a captain teaching
at The Basic School, and many of us hoped he would be Commandant
some day, the first Commandant since Al Gray who would try to move
the Marine Corps beyond Second Generation war (in more than its
doctrine manuals).
But the
Imperial Court gets what it wants, and what it wants are not generals
like Greg Newbold. It wants senior "leaders" who are,
above all, compliant, and it finds no shortage of candidates. They
may growl about Rumsfeld in private, but in public they bow and
scrape, not only to the SecDef and the catastrophic policies of
a failed Presidency, but even more to "high tech" and
its magical ability to expand defense budgets. At some point they
will make a break, because the military does not want to wear the
albatross of (two) lost wars. But not until they have extracted
the uttermost farthing.
The
play is titled, "No Exit." Unless, unless . . . Rumsfeld’s
head should not be the only one to roll.
April
28, 2006
William
Lind [send him mail]
is Director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free
Congress Foundation. The views expressed in this article are those
of Mr. Lind, writing in his personal capacity.
Copyright
© 2006 William S. Lind
William
Lind Archives
|