Let
Go of the Centralized State
by
Scott
Lazarowitz
Recently
by Scott Lazarowitz: Abe
Lincoln’s Legacy: Leviathan’s Bondage of All Americans
There have
been several events in the news this past week that have distracted
Americans from the more pressing issues of the day. The distractions
have included President Obama’s finally releasing his birth certificate
to please Donald Trump, The Royal Wedding, and the Navy SEALs’ carrying
out of Obama’s order to kill Osama bin Laden. The news of the bin
Laden killing overshadowed the killing of Libyan leader Gadhafi’s
son and three grandchildren in NATO’s failed attempt to kill Gadhafi
himself. As Rad Geek explains,
Two of the
(Gadhafi) grandchildren they killed were toddlers, a two-year-old
girl, and a two-year-old boy. The other was a baby girl only 5
months old.
Now we have
seen how premier Obama has snubbed the people’s representatives
– Congress – by acting on his own executive power like a dictator,
to bomb Libya and kill its civilians, and we have seen how the Obama
Administration has given many contradictory details about the killing
of Osama bin Laden. Only in an Orwellian socialist banana republic
would we see these things happening. But Obama is merely taking
on the expanded executive powers of Bush that the conservatives
and Tea Partiers enthusiastically supported.
However, regardless
how ghastly our Western governments are in their constant murders
of innocent civilians especially children and little babies, and
regardless of the constant distractions promoted by the subservient
Washington press corps, Americans must face the truth about our
current economic ordeal, and about our future: Washington’s runaway
spending, debts and, really, the flawed structure of the centralized
State itself.
Regarding the
spending, conservatives and Tea Party congressmen and senators winced
and dodged and brought their pledge
to cut $100 billion from the federal budget down to $61 billion,
only to then agree with Democrats to cut $38 billion, which it turns
out will amount to a mere $353
million in cuts. This is out of a budget of $3.7 trillion.
And in addition
to all that, if conservatives and Tea Partiers knuckle under with
regards to the raising of the debt ceiling, that will be further
proof of the accuracy of my prediction
from March, 2010, that the November 2010 elections would be nothing
but more "rearranging of deck chairs" on sinking Titanic
America.
If Americans
can’t see by now how insincere their representatives in Washington
are in fixing the problems, and aren’t willing to consider changing
the entire structure of governance, then change has to be up to
individuals and organizations who actually believe in morality and
our inalienable rights to life and liberty.
Americans must
begin to face the hard truth that centralism and central planning
just don’t
work. The Social Security and Medicare schemes are naturally
going bankrupt, and the Federal Reserve continues to produce more
valueless paper money and in turn causes price inflation to further
impoverish us.
It is impossible
for any centralized institution, especially a territorial monopoly
such as a federal government in Washington, to oversee a population
of many millions and control a society’s daily functions and to
provide services from a central authority based thousands of miles
away. It is impractical for central planners to carry out such assigned
caretaker duties, because they could not possibly know what is needed
at any given time in any given part of such a large society.
The main areas
of disastrous centralization have been in the U.S. government’s
aggression against foreigners and the government’s invasiveness
against Americans’ civil liberties and economic matters.
Centralization
of Foreign Affairs and Government’s Civil Liberties Violations
The Tea Partiers
have been supportive of an unconstitutional national
security socialism that – as has been seen in past totalitarian
societies – can be used as tools for conniving government bureaucrats
to oppress
their own people. Such threats to the people’s civil liberties
and their due process rights, and invasions of their persons and
property, seem to happen most the more centralized governing institutions
are. (e.g. Soviet
Union.)
But if only
the Tea Partiers could connect the governmental encroachments, civil
liberties intrusions and property trespasses of domestic policies
they oppose (such as ObamaCare and the Federal Reserve’s inflationary
policies) with the governmental encroachments, civil liberties intrusions
and property trespasses of the foreign policies they have naively
supported (such as the PATRIOT Act, TSA intrusions etc.),
The Department
of Homeland Security, TSA and CIA are not protecting Americans from
terrorists – they are increasingly trespassing our persons and property,
so we are increasingly threatened and unprotected from the predations
of these agents of government, far more than we are threatened by
terrorists.
But now, an
even more serious warning sign than the TSA’s predations is the
government’s implementing new invasive,
extortive means of gathering private information, to make it
difficult to even leave the country. That is the beginning
of the process of the government’s keeping the people in
the country, involuntarily. If this newest sinking into totalitarianism
isn’t enough to make people finally consider decentralizing America,
and secession and nullification, I don’t know what is.
As I have noted
here,
in contrast to the current centralized monopoly in Washington, which
has done nothing but provoke foreigners against us, thus making
us less safe, decentralizing and removing any monopoly in security
would reduce the possibility of any one U.S. state using aggression
against other states and against foreigners, and thus would make
us safer. It would also remove the threat against our liberty that
the totalcrats in Washington currently pose.
Centralization
of Economic Affairs
Economically,
in addition to loss of liberty, the trend toward more centralization
and bureaucratization has resulted in more severe recessions, distortions
of markets and further crises and catastrophes. This trend is due
to the increasing lack of willingness to rely on the individual
to control one’s own life and be responsible for oneself. In other
words, independence – which logically coincides with liberty – has
been unwittingly traded in for serfdom.
Now, as if
the Federal Reserve were not bad enough, there have been calls for
a centralized, global currency
and global
central bank. For some reason, so many people are just unwilling
to admit what the Austrian economists have been trying to demonstrate
for a hundred years, that the artificial extreme economic booms
and busts have for decades been caused by governmental intrusions
into the people’s economic and monetary matters, and that, if left
alone by these compulsory governmental forces, markets and economic
downturns will be self-correcting. Unfortunately, so many people
have a weakness for dependence on authority and the officialdom
of State controls, despite the disasters they have wrought.
The Federal
Reserve has given the banks the ability to make risk-free loans
and investments without the obligations to take responsibility for
their actions. The Fed encourages banks to engage in financial recklessness,
very much like the ability of Congress to borrow from future generations
that enables or even encourages Congress to act recklessly. The
centralization of a global currency and central bank are the exact
opposite of what needs to be done.
As Ron Paul
notes in his book, End
the Fed, the federally-protected banks have been able to
"privatize profits and socialize losses." This moral hazard
of centralization and socialism has been at the heart of economic
dysfunction throughout our society and throughout the world for
many years. But, as Dr. Paul declares, "The banking industry
needs its welfare check ended."
It is because
of the Fed’s monopoly on our compulsory medium of exchange that
has enabled the growing military-industrial-complex to expand its
parasitic grasp on the fruits of the American producers’ labor.
And, like the banking industry, the military-industrial-complex
needs its welfare check ended.
Compulsory
federal legal tender laws, compulsory central bank power and control,
fraudulent fractional reserve banking and tax-funded bailouts are
all based on government-expropriation of private wealth via back-door
schemes and thus create moral hazards, as well as ultimately lead
to the impoverishment of the masses. Therefore, the American people
must decentralize monetarily and remove the federal government’s
monopoly in money production and distribution – the Federal Reserve
System – and allow for free, unrestricted banking under the rule
of law, and allow competing
currencies and money backed by something of actual value such
as gold and silver.
Americans and
the individual states also need to consider taking
back ownership of lands that the federal government has illegitimately
taken from them, decentralize their energy
sources, and decentralize their utilities
including water.
It may be the case that Americans will have to use nullification
and outright withdraw their consent to being shackled by federal
government regulations, taxes, mandates and other intrusions that
restrict Americans’ God-given inalienable rights to their liberty
and prosperity.
Some people
perceive such suggestions of civil disobedience and non-compliance
as being an advocacy for "lawlessness" or even violence.
But, I must point out that such non-violent acts of individual and
group nullification of authoritarian dictates are necessary when
the centralized government overreaches and becomes the people’s
primary violator of individual liberty, trespasser of private property
and expropriator of wealth.
It is the centralized
government that has been guilty of the lawlessness and violence,
and it must be stopped. As we have seen from the people’s representatives
in Washington and their submissive unwillingness to stand up to
the executive branch or to even adjust their deficits and debts,
the idea of a "limited" government is just not
realistic.
When people
who are used to being dependent on the authority and power of the
always-growing centralized federal government feel apprehensive
in implementing such decentralization, they need to revisit the
idea of local control, which is the real source of the "power
to the people." In contrast to the planned chaos produced by
national centralism, it is the local level in which production,
efficiency and prosperity are best achieved.
Additionally,
at the local level, not only do most people actually know each other,
but there is also more of a solidarity and common purpose that just
cannot truly exist between centralized government bureaucrats and
the rest of a big population. As economist Friedrich Hayek observed,
Agreement
about a common purpose between a group of known people is clearly
an idea that cannot be applied to a large society which includes
people who do not know one another. The modern society and the
modern economy have grown up through the recognition that this
idea – which was fundamental to life in a small group – a face-to-face
society, is simply inapplicable to large groups. The essential
basis of the development of modern civilization is to allow people
to pursue their own ends on the basis of their own knowledge and
not be bound by the aims of other people.
As the necessary
process of decentralizing America unfolds, Murray Rothbard addresses
the issue of what to do about the national debt. Supposedly, we
Americans owe others a lot of money – over $14 trillion – because
our Congress has spent wildly, selfishly and irresponsibly. Rothbard
states the difference between private debt and this immoral scheme
of "public debt."
If sanctity
of contracts should rule in the world of private debt, shouldn’t
they be equally as sacrosanct in public debt? Shouldn’t public
debt be governed by the same principles as private? The answer
is no…
If I borrow
money from a mortgage bank, I have made a contract to transfer
my money to a creditor at a future date; in a deep sense, he is
the true owner of the money at that point, and if I don’t pay
I am robbing him of his just property. But when government borrows
money, it does not pledge its own money; its own resources are
not liable. Government commits not its own life, fortune, and
sacred honor to repay the debt, but ours…
In short,
public creditors are willing to hand over money to the government
now in order to receive a share of tax loot in the future. This
is the opposite of a free market, or a genuinely voluntary transaction.
Both parties are immorally contracting to participate in the violation
of the property rights of citizens in the future. Both parties,
therefore, are making agreements about other people’s property,
and both deserve the back of our hand. The public credit transaction
is not a genuine contract that need be considered sacrosanct,
any more than robbers parceling out their shares of loot in advance
should be treated as some sort of sanctified contract…
With the increasing
federal government debacles in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Pakistan,
and the economic mess caused by Congress and the Federal Reserve,
and the police state intrusions being waged against us by a tyrannical
Obama regime, we are seeing that the U.S. federal government is
the one institution most at fault and guilty of causing the ruin
of the United States of America. This centralized government parasite’s
shackles must be removed if we are to return to a civilization of
economic solvency and human progress.
Americans are
really going to have to seriously consider decentralizing the country
and returning to state sovereignty and independence. If Belgium
can do it, so can we.
So, just as
little boys and girls must let go of their mommy and daddy’s hand
eventually, so must the American people let go of their dependence
on – and serfdom under – the smothering, punitive and reactionary
centralized State, the U.S. federal government.
May 10, 2011
Scott
Lazarowitz [send him mail]
is a commentator and cartoonist at Reasonandjest.com.
Copyright
© 2011 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of Scott Lazarowitz
|