Clear
Channeling
by
Karen Kwiatkowski
I
listen to Sean Hannity sometimes, and recently I heard him speak
in a mysterious code. I’ll bet you have too, but here goes.
He
asked a caller where they listened to his radio show. Then he said
what sounded to me like, "Are you clear channel?"
Later,
I heard the words "clear channel" mentioned by other neo-con
mouthpieces on the radio. But I didn’t know what it was.
Then
came the Dixie Chicks controversy. Word was if you are a good American,
love your country, and by extension, support Bush policy, you would
no longer listen to Chick songs or buy Chick CDs. I incorrectly
thought this was a natural backlash on the part of country music
fans, and I expected the impact to be minimal and isolated, probably
localized. But the national impact on airplay and CD sales was,
in fact, huge. It didn’t seem like me and my cousins could have
made that much difference just by calling our local country radio
stations.
Especially
since most of the local stations don’t take requests anymore.
Turns
out, it may not have been my cousins who called the stations. And
it turns out the stations are a station.
It’s
Clear Channel!
Clear
Channel is the largest radio operator in the United States, with
around 1200 radio and over 35 TV stations reaching some 115 million
Americans. I only know this because recently saw where the British
Broadcasting Channel is
worried about being added to the list. But I should have known
sooner, because there are no secrets with Clear Channel.
For
example, Clear Channel is big, and has been accused of having "a
corporate
culture in which dirty tricks are a way of life." Enron-like,
some say.
After
Sept. 11, 2001, Clear Channel stations refrained
from playing a list of potentially offensive songs, including
John Lennon's "Imagine" and the entire catalogue of Rage Against
the Machine. They are capable of corporate discipline, it seems.
In
the days leading up to the invasion of Iraq, Clear Channel talk
radio provided 100% of what you want to hear if you speak neo-conservative,
and the Clear Channel corporation sponsored
a number of well publicized pro-war or anti-antiwar
rallies.
Clear
Channel is home-based in Texas, and it is no secret that Clear Channel
Worldwide vice chairman Tom Hicks bought
the Texas Rangers in 1999 from a little known Texas governor named
George W. Bush for $250
million.
It
is also no secret that the same Tom Hicks, as Chairman of the University
of Texas Investment Management Corporation (UTIMCO) lobbied the
same governor (Dubya) for some rules changes, then got in a little
trouble for sending
privatization contracts to Bush cronies. Sounds like déjà
vu all over again, except we weren’t talking about rebuilding Iraq.
Now that’s different!
And
it is no secret that current Chairman and CEO of Clear Channel,
L.
Lowry Mays, is still on the UTIMCO Compensation Committee, and
is a major Bush contributor.
Clear
Channel also promotes concerts, including 26 recent and upcoming
Dixie Chick concerts – normally very lucrative when you also own
a radio business.
Which
brings us back to the recent Chick apologies
for Natalie Maines’ comment about being ashamed that George W. Bush
was from Texas. Why did she apologize on Primetime Thursday? Because
Clear Channel needs folks to get over this and come back to Dixie
Chick concerts.
Maines
did apologize for making a disrespectful remark, and she kind of
apologized for "feeling that she had a lot of questions about
the war that went unanswered."
Ironically,
Clear Channel is now trying to recover from what their own radio
network did to their concert business. It is too bad Diane Sawyer
couldn’t ask what Maines’ "public apology" had to say
about speech in America, or draw a comparison to the Baseball Hall
of Fame’s cancellation
of a Bull Durham anniversary event, because Tim Robbins’ opinions
could have "placed troops [in Iraq] in danger." Yes, really!
In
an age of a thousand TV and radio shows that celebrate human vice
and go giddy over the humiliation and stupidity of "other"
people, one does wonder why Natalie, by herself, must actually say
she’s sorry on TV. Perhaps the neo-cons are more sensitive and tender-hearted
than we thought.
Sawyer
might also have wondered who decides what is "disrespectful"
to a sitting President (or his cabinet members). Was neo-con party
boy Newt’s recent public attack on Secretary of State Colin Powell
at the American Enterprise Institute, engineered by the Defense
Policy Group, disrespectful, or was Newt just stating his opinion
because he has a lot of questions about the State Department that
have gone unanswered?
If
Maines had said "I’m proud Dubya is from Texas!" we might
have seen a different story from Clear Channel propaganda masters.
Courageous, they’d say! Patriotic and all American! Natalie is a
model citizen, and looking really svelte, too! Buy concert tickets!
This
would be a lot more fun if it was a neo-con conspiracy. But it isn’t.
Clear Channel simply wants some FCC rules updated to allow them
to expand
their radio and TV businesses. To get that, they need to behave
in a supportive manner under the current Bush administration. It’s
just good business, like buying Bush’s baseball team and redirecting
public moneys to friends of the family.
It
may not be transparent, or even easy to identify, but it is definitely
clear!
April
29, 2003
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a recently retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final
four and a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now
lives with her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|