The
Bright Side of MCA 2006?
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
DIGG THIS
Constitutionalists,
liberty lovers, and those who recognize the true nature of the leviathan
state rightfully despair of the latest
law of the land. The Military Commission Act of 2006 is a disaster
of epic proportions, as Keith
Olbermann and others
have noted.
This unfortunate
law is a tsunami originating in the underground statism and overt
imperialism of America in the 20th century. A critical
disturbance has occurred deep below an ocean called "War on
Terror," with its imagined fearsome fleet called "Islamofascism."
It is a tectonic crash that resonates deeply in the generalized
anxiety of Americans who vaguely sense that the future for their
children is going to be very different than they hoped.
Americans should
be anxious. The enemy is already inside the gates. In fact, the
enemy now mans the gates. At the risk of being targeted sooner or
later for anti-governmental think-crimes, let me be clear. The enemy
manning our gates is any president occupying our nation’s unitary
executive suites. Today, this is George W. Bush, with his puppetmasters,
political playpen
pals, and those associated with his administration and his political
party. Tomorrow it will be another power hungry do-gooder who speaks
of accountable government, while welcoming unlimited personal compromise,
backroom deals, more war, less freedom, and other people’s money.
The tsunami
of MCA 2006, like all tsunamis in the open ocean, causes no stir,
no alarm. It gives little warning, and only those who understand
the ocean and are watching for just such a disturbance notice what
has happened.
Only when its
energy is constrained by underwater mountains and solid coastlines
will it become dangerous, destructive, and deadly. Innocent people
will then be swept away, their investments and their livelihoods
destroyed, their children, spouses, friends and lovers lost to them.
When the eventual destruction of MCA 2006 strikes home, many of
us will be forced to start over, if we survive at all.
But this was
supposed to be an upbeat article! Where’s the fun, the merriment,
the sheer delight that thinking and reflective creatures ought to
take in all things state?
Imagine, dear
reader, if you will, one of the first applications of this antiterrorist
legislation, sans habeas corpus, flaunting all executive
power, all the time. Young Mr. Bush is soon for the ranch, mumbling
strangely to himself and his rare visitor about how he coulda been
somebody (other than Nixon on crack). But it is the next Tyrant
of the United States who will delight today’s contrarians.
Imagine – briefly
– if you will, the pasty-faced, well-fed, overbearing Richard
Perle, or the political
canine David Frum. Imagine, if you will, our amusing curmudgeon
of a Defense Secretary and his pal Dick Cheney.
Each of these
has lauded, associated, and given moral, if not material support,
to the Iranian terrorist group known as MeK.
According to
past legislation, presidential signing statements and the MCA "Death
to Habeas Corpus" Act of 2006, these lucky pundits, secretaries
of defense, and vice presidents may be held incommunicado, without
access to a lawyer, without being told of the "evidence"
against them, without access to a court of law or an independent
judge. Wait …I left something out. Held indefinitely. Perhaps
secretly. Might they be bound and gagged, sexually humiliated, frightened
by dogs or sub-standard enlistees and overzealous and poorly trained
officers, or the odd contractor? Why not?
Far be it from
me to wish evil on those who have dished out enough death, enough
lawlessness, enough stupidity, and enough arrogance at home and
in foreign countries like Afghanistan and Iraq for ten lifetimes.
I am genuinely concerned that with a turn of the screw, the screws
may be indeed be turned on
these well-known, high-profile advocates of Iranian regime change.
Among the war
lovers, perhaps some dormant awareness of the dangers of cavorting
with someone else’s terrorist group exists. The American Enterprise
Institute’s Michael Rubin and Michael Ledeen have both this year
sought to publicly distance themselves from the MeK (while simultaneously
associating the Democrats with the terrorist group). Rubin got in
trouble in January 2006 with the less prudent of the war-rabid with
an article entitled "Monsters
of the Left: The Mujahedin al-Khalq." In July of this year,
Ledeen, responding to assertions in James Bamford’s "Iran:
The Next War," wrote that "I
wouldn't get within a hundred miles of the MEK."
Sorry? Can
you speak up, Michael, and Dick and Don and Mr. Perle? The problem
for these guys (beyond protesting too much) is that with habeas
corpus no longer required, the search, detention, and indefinite
imprisonment of people any reigning government or its civil servants
find unsavory, untrustworthy, critical or adversarial – dare I say
criminal? – is legal, and this law will be enforced in the name
of Freedom, Peace, Democracy, and Security.
Will the ACLU
or the antiwar movement truly and aggressively jump in to prevent
figurative and literal waterboarding of those who promoted our police
state at home, and cheered the creative
destruction visited upon certain oil producing states abroad?
Our native human weakness and moral opportunism finds its expression
in organized politics, but is not political. We humans are, as ever,
minutes from mob-hood, and we cultivate the very finest of short-term
memories. We collectively froth at the bit to see harsh justice
done to those we "know" to be guilty.
As the Republic
crumbles before our eyes, we of the anti-war crowd may find a chuckle
or two in the early applications of the Military Commission Act
of 2006 by the next administration. And perhaps, as we whisper and
tap out codes to our esteemed neoconservative cell-mates, we will
get the answer as to why the United States really went to war in
the Middle East.
October
20, 2006
Karen
Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send her
mail], a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, has written on defense
issues with a libertarian perspective for MilitaryWeek.com,
hosted the call-in radio show American
Forum, and blogs occasionally for Huffingtonpost.com
and Liberty and Power.
Archives of her American Forum radio program can be accessed here
and here. To receive
automatic announcements of new articles, click
here. This article originally appeared on MilitaryWeek.com.
Copyright ©
2006 Karen Kwiatkowski
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|