Spontaneous Order
by
Robert Klassen
by Robert Klassen
Sometimes
we can’t see what we’re looking at. For example, I was watching
a baseball game on television, and as the camera panned the stadium,
the announcer said that paid attendance was forty-two thousand.
Nothing remarkable about that, right? Only this time I saw what
all of those people were doing eating, drinking, chatting, pointing,
and watching the game and what they were not doing fighting,
stealing, and tearing each other to pieces. Why? Was there some
all-powerful force making those thousands of people behave? No,
they were only acting normally.
Television
drama portrays misbehavior and violence as normal, yet we don’t
experience violence in everyday life. I have driven all over North
America, and lived in all kinds of environments, and I’ve never
experienced what television portrays as normal. Why? Because people
don’t normally behave like that.
Actual
normal human behavior has come to be called spontaneous order, the
bane of political central planners, and television dramatists, everywhere.
One man who studied it in the context of civilization was Spencer
Heath, who published his "findings"
in 1957. Unfortunately, his book is out of print at the moment,
but an excellent summary
of his life and work is to be found in these three links.
Heath
particularly noted that human civilization advanced as human life-span
increased, and populations grew. A subsistence-level desert or jungle
tribe with an individual life expectancy of thirty years could barely
reproduce itself, and could make little or no improvement in their
standard of living, whereas a riparian tribe might discover agriculture,
and increase both life-span and lifestyle with improved nutrition.
I
doubt if people living eight-thousand years ago understood the changes
that more food made in their societies. I doubt if a millet farmer
in the ancient Nile delta saw himself at the forefront of a revolution,
any more than a Cornish coal miner saw himself in that role two-centuries
ago. Indeed, mankind almost invariably attributes human progress
to the wrong source; we are somehow unable to see what we’re looking
at.
The
Industrial Revolution caught most intellectual interpreters, and
all political parasites, by surprise. Here were the little people,
the faithful subjects, going about their business of feeding their
royal drones, and suddenly machines appeared to do the grueling
work of peasants and slaves. As if by magic, new institutions arose
in banking, and trade, and the little people nearly got out of the
ages-old political trap. Then came Marx, and his tricky trap.
I
would argue that mankind still hasn’t come to terms with the Industrial
Revolution. We permitted the political plunder of its wonder and
wealth from the outset, even while we participated in its propagation,
and enjoyed its benefits. We suffered grievously from political
usurpation of this power, both in taxes, and in lives, and we still
do not see, or acknowledge, where the power originates. Spencer
Heath did.
Today
we stand on the threshold of another revolution. Human population
is growing at an historically unprecedented rate; there have never
been so many human persons living on this planet. Meanwhile, individual
life expectancy is also growing. In Heath’s terms, mankind has never
had this kind of creative and productive potential before, and we
should be prepared to see momentous changes.
What
changes? I depart from the doom and gloom crowd here, and I predict
the decline and fall of political governments everywhere, not from
violence, but from irrelevance. Political boundaries don’t matter
anymore. Political fiat money is changing into something else. Political
coercion is on the line this minute, and people are rejecting it.
We will find better ways of doing things, once we see what we’re
looking at.
October
18, 2004
Robert
Klassen [send him mail]
retired from a forty-year career in critical-care respiratory therapy.
He is the author of five books, including Atlantis:
A Novel about Economic Government,
and Economic
Government, which describe a solution
to the problem of political government. Here's
his web site.
Copyright
© 2004 Robert Klassen
Robert
Klassen Archives
|