State Disease
by
Robert Klassen
Regarding
political government as a disease is most useful. Recently I read
Plagues
And Peoples by William H. McNeill,
(1976 Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, New York). Here are his
thoughts on the subject: (pp. 53–55)
"Before
proceeding further with disease history, it is worth pointing out
the parallels between the microparasitism of infectious disease
and the macroparasitism of military operations. Only when civilized
communities had built up a certain level of wealth and skill did
war and raiding become an economically viable enterprise. But seizing
the harvest by force, if it led to speedy death of the agricultural
work force from starvation, was an unstable form of macroparasitism.
Nevertheless such events happened often enough, and deserve to be
compared with parasitic invasions like African rinderpest of 1891
that also destroyed the hosts in such numbers as to inhibit the
establishment of any stable, ongoing infectious pattern.
"Very
early in civilized history, successful raiders became conquerors,
i.e., learned how to rob agriculturalists in such a way as to take
from them some but not all of the harvest. By trial and error a
balance could and did arise, whereby cultivators could survive such
predation by producing more grain and other crops than were needed
for their own maintenance. Such surpluses may be viewed as the antibodies
appropriate to human macroparasitism. A successful government immunizes
those who pay rent and taxes against catastrophic raids and foreign
invasion in the same way that a low-grade infection can immunize
its host against lethally disastrous disease invasion. Disease immunity
arises by stimulating surplus production of food and raw materials
sufficient to support specialists in violence in suitably large
numbers and with appropriate weaponry. Both defense reactions constitute
burdens on the host populations, but a burden less onerous that
periodic exposure to sudden lethal disaster.
"The
result of establishing successful governments is to create a vastly
more formidable society vis-à-vis other human communities.
Specialists in violence can scarcely fail to prevail against men
who have to spend most of their time producing or finding food.
And as we shall soon see, a suitably diseased society, in which
endemic forms of viral and bacterial infection continually provoke
antibody formation by invading susceptible individuals unceasingly,
is vastly more formidable from an epidemiological point of view
vis-à-vis simpler and healthier human societies. Macroparasitism
leading to the development of powerful military and political organization
therefore has its counterpart in the biological defenses human populations
create when exposed to the microparasitism of bacteria and viruses.
In other words, warfare and disease are connected by more than rhetoric
and the pestilences that have so often marched with and in the wake
of armies."
Thinking
of "antibody formations" to the disease of state "macroparasitism"
leads me to think of far more than merely out-producing their theft.
It leads me to think of immunizing institutions that actually protect
us from the disease. Here we need a new form of insurance, as suggested
by Hans-Herman Hoppe in Democracy,
The God That Failed, that would guarantee us protection
from predatory infection by the state. After the current agents
of this disease bring Western Civilization to its knees, perhaps
such private institutions will arise to ensure our survival.
March 8, 2003
Robert
Klassen [send him mail]
is a medical technician and writer. Here's
his web site.
Copyright
© 2003 William H. McNeill
Robert
Klassen Archives
|