Contra and Pro Bonner
by
Ira Katz
by Ira Katz
I admit to being an avid reader of LRC. In fact, dragging my computer
into bed to read LRC is usually the first thing I do in the morning.
My favorite contributor is Mr. Bill Bonner. His humor tinged with
a pessimistic dread of the future is thoroughly entertaining, not
to mention informative. However, I have a quibble with something
he wrote recently in regard to the starting date for the great confiscation
of wealth through inflation by the federal government of the United
States. In his piece George
Best, RIP he wrote:
Looking at a chart of the dollar is like looking at an EKG of
a dying man. From 1800 until 1935 the lines go up and down. A
dollar bought a dollar's worth of goods and services in 1800...in
1850...in 1900...and up until about 1935. At that point, the line
begins to fall. It does not rise again. Instead, each and every
year it loses purchasing power, so that by 2005 the 1800 dollar
is only worth about 5 cents.
So Bonner puts the date at 1935, the culprit being that archfiend
Roosevelt. Certainly he would be present on my Mount Rushmore of
pillage. Lincoln (introducing the greenback and so much more!) and
Nixon (breaking the last link to gold) belong up there. And if we
allow for others besides presidents, our Maestro Greenspan deserves
recognition. But the number one pillager is President Woodrow Wilson,
the great fuddy-duddy, holier-than-thou destroyer of civilizations.
It was under his watch that the Federal Reserve Bank was created.
Consider the CPI data from EH.net (Economic
History) plotted below. It gives the equivalent current dollars
to a dollar in 1790. Thus, as the number goes up the value of the
dollar goes down. A word of caution as to the accuracy (or value)
of economic statistics such as these is necessary even for readers
of this site. I have seen several attempts to measure inflation,
all of them lacking in many ways. But all of them agree on the issue
at hand. While the destruction of value after 1935 is of monumental
proportions, we Austrian economic devotees know the mechanism. In
the details of the data we note that over the 123 years between
1790 and 1913 the lowest value of $1.78 occurred in 1865 after the
greatest war and destruction of our history. But after the Fed,
in the peace and prosperity of 1921, the value collapsed to $2.18.
In the midst of the depression the value did pick up to $1.49 in
1935 in spite of the attempts of the Fed to inflate. And of course,
as it is said, the rest is history.

But I cannot write about Mr. Bonner’s work without giving an example
of how much I agree with him. In The
Tyranny of the Living he writes:
The trouble with the news is that it is impossible to know what
is important when you must rely solely on the judgment of people
who happen to be breathing. The living can imagine no problems
more urgent than the ones they confront right now, and no opportunities
greater than the ones right in front of them. We prefer the obituaries.
As a student in high school and college I used to make a point
of reading the paper, in detail, every day. I eventually realized
that it was a waste of time. I had friends who worked for USA Today,
for the only useful section, the sports. In the newsroom a television
was always tuned to CNN. They told me that the news does not change
in 30 minutes. It occurred to me that it also does not change in
24 hours. Most of the stories on major events literally say nothing
new. If one also considers the fact that most newspaper writing
itself is terrible and infused with ignorance, it is not difficult
to reach the conclusion that reading the paper is a waste of time.
I quit reading the newspaper cold turkey. I have often tried to
explain my decision to others. I am trained as an engineer so my
explanation has a technical nature. The news is a measurement of
history where the frequency of sampling the signal is at such a
high frequency as only to perceive the noise. It is much more important
to understand the lower frequency scales of years, decades, generations,
and centuries. So now I generally just read books, a few quarterly
periodicals, and, of course, LRC (which has so much wisdom that
it can be read daily). But even for books, my guideline is to only
read those written at least 50 years ago. I will end this piece
with a quote from one of those old books, Remembrance
of Things Past (or In Search of Lost Time?) by Marcel
Proust, (translated by Moncrieff, Random House, v.1, p. 20)
"I say!" exclaimed Swann to my grandfather, "what I was going
to tell you has more to do than you might think with what you
were asking me just now, for in some respects there has been very
little change. I came across a passage in Saint-Simon this morning
which would have amused you. It is in the volume which covers
his mission to Spain; not one of the best, little more in fact
than a journal, but at least it is a journal wonderfully well
written, which fairly distinguishes it from the devastating (sic)
journalism that we feel bound to read these days, morning, noon
and night."
"I do not agree with you: there are some days when I find reading
the papers very pleasant indeed!" my aunt Flora broke in,
to show Swann that she had read the note about his Corot in the
'Figaro.'
"Yes," aunt Celine went one better. "When they write things about
people whom we are interested."
"I don't deny it," answered Swann in some bewilderment. "The
fault I find with our journalism is that it forces us to take
an interest in some fresh triviality or other every day, whereas
only three or four books in a lifetime give us anything that is
of real importance. Suppose that, every morning when we tore the
wrapper off our paper with fevered hands, a transmutation were
to take place, and we were to find inside it – oh! I don't know;
shall we say Pascal's 'Pensees?'"
November
28, 2005
Ira
Katz [send him mail] teaches
mechanical engineering at Lafayette College. He is the co-author
of Handling
Mr. Hyde: Questions and Answers about Manic Depression and
Introduction
to Fluid Mechanics.
Copyright
© 2005 LewRockwell.com
Ira
Katz Archives
|