Small
Blessings: An Addendum to the Tate Sentence
by
Myles Kantor
Tuesday’s
Talk Back Live on CNN examined the Lionel Tate sentencing.
To balance out guests including Al Sharpton and Lionel Tate’s attorney,
the panel featured Ellen Morphonios, a retired Florida circuit court
judge whose "reputation for tough sentences earned her the
nickname ‘Maximum Morphonios,’" said host Bobbie Battista.
Too
bad Morphonios didn’t live up to her moniker, saying at one point:
"The plea bargain that was offered by the District Attorney,
by the State Attorney, which the defense counsel and the mother
rejected, was eminently fair. That was a fair plea; that was a fair
sentence. It was a good sentence and never, ever, ever should have
been turned down." Morphonios later noted in this vein that
"The prosecutor wasn’t being hard-nosed; the judge was approving
what was a fine sentence."
To
reiterate, the plea bargain in question would have incarcerated
Tate in a juvenile facility for three years followed by ten years
probation.
Now
a slew of individuals has expended plenty of energy denouncing the
sentence Tate received (life without parole) as a barbaric penalty
pointing to an inhumane system. (Amnesty International contends
it violates international law yet another reason why Americans should
repudiate institutions such as the International Criminal Court
that would smash our self-determination, such as it is.) Thus far,
though, I haven’t heard a single person denounce or even criticize
the initial plea bargain.
I
submit that three years in prison and ten years probation would
have been superfluous and flagrant leniency for the crime Lionel
Tate perpetrated upon Tiffany Eunick. At the risk of appealing to
common sense in a senseless age, should someone who fractured a
six year-old girl’s skull and detached her liver be out of prison
in three years? Is that an equitable term of confinement for this
atrocity?
Call
me skeptical, but I doubt the hue and cry attending the life sentence
would have manifested against the plea bargain had it been accepted.
Whereas
Tate’s life sentence will in all likelihood be reduced, acceptance
of the plea bargain would have been an irrevocable injustice. That
the prosecution made this a possibility is alarming. That a consensus
considers that possibility to have been appropriate reflects an
even more alarming deficit of compassion.
Tate’s
mother and attorney made a massive miscalculation when they rejected
the plea bargain. Let us appreciate small blessings.
March
23, 2001
Myles
Kantor lives in Boynton Beach, Florida.
Copyright
2001 LewRockwell.com
Myles
Kantor Archives
|