Culture Clash
by
Gail Jarvis
Some
of you may have read national media reports about the suspension
of Beaufort high school students for wearing clothing bearing Confederate
flag emblems. School administrators claim that the suspensions were
necessary to prevent a disruption of the school environment. As
justification, they cited an incident wherein a student wearing
a T-shirt with a Confederate flag logo was handing out recruiting
leaflets for the Aryan Nation. Hall monitors had to intervene when
other students angrily confronted this student. These media reports
are true as far as they go, but they are only part of the story.
As a journalist embedded in Beaufort, let me give you the unedited
version.
What
is occurring in Beaufort is best described as a "Cultural Clash."
In their reviews of "My
Big Fat Greek Wedding" some film critics used this term to describe
the predicament that ensues when a female raised in a traditional
Greek family becomes romantically involved with a non-Greek WASP
male. The sharp diversity of their cultural backgrounds does indeed
create quite a clash for the two lovers, but scriptwriters made
the clash comedic. And in this fictional version of life, the WASP
forsakes his traditions in favor of Greek religious and cultural
mores; marries the girl, and everyone lives happily ever after.
But
cultural clashes involving groups and institutions, like the one
unfolding in Beaufort, are more complex than those between families
and individuals. Although Beaufort is often described as a quaint
little coastal town, the cultural clash here can be viewed as a
microcosm of the larger society. This clash involves Beaufort high
school students and their parents, and the root of the conflict
is African-American heritage versus Southern heritage. Specifically,
the issue is the school’s policies regarding the rights of students
to honor their particular heritage.
In
the past half-century, African-Americans have zealously promoted
their heritage with various commemorations and special events. The
tremendous success of their efforts is largely attributable to the
enormous support received from the mainstream media. In fact, the
immense outpouring of media encouragement for African-American endeavors
in the past few decades is probably unprecedented in the history
of mass communications. At Beaufort high schools African-American
heritage is primarily sustained by the Umoja Ujima Service Club
whose members wear clothing emblazoned with a depiction of the continent
of Africa. Umoja Ujima is a term that combines two principles of
Kwanzaa and means "unity through collective work and responsibility."
During
the same half-century, Southerners have passively watched as their
cultural traditions have been gradually eliminated as a result of
attacks from political activists and the mainstream media. Southern
heritage has been a victim of what we might call a cultural pogrom.
The media campaign has been so effective that some Southerners only
reluctantly admit to being born south of the Mason Dixon Line. But
as usually happens in these cases, a backlash has developed and
now Southerners are fighting to reclaim their birthright. At Beaufort
high schools, students honor Southern heritage by wearing clothing
that bears the logo of the Confederate flag or other Confederate
symbols.
Until
recently, there have been no reports of serious conflicts between
African-American culture and Southern heritage. The cultural clash
first came to the public’s attention as a result of an occurrence
during an elementary school graduation ceremony. Parents, grandparents
and relatives of the graduating class were shocked and incensed
by the performance of the Umoja Ujima step team. Complaints to school
officials accused the teen-aged girls that comprise the team of
engaging in sexually suggestive body gyrations inappropriate for
school children not to mention adults. Parents were also outraged
at the step team for chanting indecent lyrics from the rap song;
"Throw Yo’ Hood Up." The first few lines of the song easily illustrate
that the outrage was justified.
"Put
yo hood up!
Represent
your s___ m____ f____
Represent
your click m____ f____
Well
sit yo’ drink up and smell yo’ m____ f____ Crown."
The
fury of the complaints resulted in the temporary suspension of the
Umoja Ujima step team and a temporary ban on future performances.
Team captain Folami Lamoke claimed that "Throw Yo’ Hood Up" was
used "because it had a beat that synchronized with a step to achieve
a specific artistic effect." She defended the "suggestive moves"
of the step team dancers as follows: "People of Asian descent move
in a certain way; people of European descent move in a certain way;
people of African descent MOVE. No apology here, none necessary.
As people of different cultures begin to interact more and more,
more and more people are starting to MOVE when they dance."
In
an editorial, The Beaufort Gazette stated: "No one doubts
that the lyrics and dance steps were inappropriate for a school
setting and maybe many other settings. The team has been suspended,
but should they have to disband?" The Gazette recommended
leniency and a probationary period for the step team and commented:
"Let’s make this a learning experience. It may be more beneficial
in the long run."
The
above incident occurred months before the student was suspended
for distributing white supremacy leaflets. His actions, although
inappropriate, caused no interruption of school activities. The
student agreed to change into a shirt without the Confederate logo
and he has since left the school.
The
Beaufort Gazette reported that, as a result of this incident,
the school principal, Bill Evans, "told hall monitors to crack down
on the Confederate emblem and asked students to keep the shirts
away from school, even though they had been wearing them in the
halls without incident for years." After imposing the ban, the principal
also said; "We’re just not going to accept people walking around
advocating that there is some superior race. I can’t tell those
people (who are offended) to forget about something that is a terrible
part of their heritage. It would be like telling somebody who’s
Jewish to ignore Nazi Germany."
Mr.
Evans’ claim that the Confederate emblem tends to "disrupt or interfere
with the school environment" is contradicted by students as well
as past history at the school. Students and their parents argue
that the Confederate flag shouldn’t be banned simply because one
student misused it. But The Beaufort Gazette accepted the
principal’s logic. In an editorial the Gazette stated: "Reasonable
students and parents understand the consequences of a white supremacy
movement in a school."
I’m
surprised that a newspaper editor would conclude that the actions
of one student constituted a "movement." Moreover, this judgment
conflicts with the Gazette’s earlier opinion that the inappropriate
behavior by some Umoja Ujima dancers was an isolated and unfortunate
incident that didn’t typify the values of the entire organization.
Also, in this later case, although it criticized the manner in which
the school’s administration handled the matter, the Gazette
endorsed the ban of all Confederate emblems; "The administration
and the board have a right to ban those shirts from school, but
they also have an obligation to educate."
Dusty
Rhodes, a 16 year-old student sent a letter to the Gazette
regarding the ban. "I was born and raised in the South. My ancestors
fought for the South. We who live in the South should be able to
wear something to show our heritage. African-Americans can wear
jewelry, robes, dresses and any African artifacts to school. African-Americans
celebrate their heritage in Black History Month, Martin Luther King
Day and the Gullah Festival. We cannot even wear a shirt or anything
that has the Confederate flag on it to school. If we can’t wear
things to school to honor our heritage, why should the African-Americans
be able to wear theirs?"
The
Beaufort Gazette asked its readers the following question: "Do
you think Beaufort High School was justified in suspending four
students who refused to stop wearing clothing bearing Confederate
symbols?" Seventy-one percent said "No." This percentage is fairly
representative of polls in surrounding states indicating that roughly
75% of respondents view the Confederate flag as a symbol of heritage
and not hate. A recent nationwide poll by Zogby shows that 66% of
the country’s population feel the same way. However, many newspaper
and TV reports convey the impression that only an insignificant
number of Confederate reactionaries view the banner as heritage.
In fact, media coverage frequently uses the term "Rebel Flag."
Pro-flag
students and their parents have held two formal protests against
what they feel is an unfair and arbitrary prohibition against Southern
heritage. Also, they paraded through the town of Beaufort waving
Confederate flags and carrying placards. The marchers were enthusiastically
received by the majority of spectators.
To
add to the controversy, a bomb threat was spray-painted on an outside
wall of the high school. Below the bomb threat a crude depiction
of a Confederate flag was also spray-painted. Without waiting for
an investigation to determine the perpetrators, Mr. Evans claimed
that the spray painting proved that Confederate emblems advocate
hate rather than heritage. The threat turned out to be a hoax and
authorities are still trying to identify the offenders.
This
rush to judgment by Principal Bill Evans conflicts with his reaction
to an earlier incident involving allegations of a teacher using
"excessive force" to discipline a student; an event unrelated to
Confederate emblems. In that case Evans advised cautious restraint,
saying: "It would be premature for us to involve law enforcement
until we got to the bottom of this and got a better picture of what
took place." Apparently, consistency is not one of Mr. Evan’s traits.
So
this is how the issue stands today. Almost 40 students have been
suspended for wearing T-shirts bearing Confederate flag images.
Some of their parents have threatened to solicit legal help from
the ACLU and the Southern Legal Resource Center. Others are considering
home schooling. School officials are adamant that the ban against
Confederate emblems will be permanent. Some local residents have
suggested that the school require uniforms for all students as a
way of resolving the conflict.
For
the present, students are complying with the ban, but their parents
still vow to use legal measures to overturn it. Each side remains
immovable. The more resourceful students now attend school with
masking tape covering their Confederate flag logos. And on the masking
tape they have written the word "Censored." This is acceptable to
school administrators who seem to have missed the irony involved.
April
10, 2003
Gail
Jarvis [send
him mail], a CPA living in
Beaufort, SC, is an advocate of the voluntary union of states established
by the founders.
Gail
Jarvis Archives
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
|