Bush Bad for Global Peace, US Image, World Believes
by
Jim Lobe
As
George W. Bush prepares to be sworn in for his second term as U.S.
president, a strong majority of the world's people are concerned
his tenure is likely to produce more setbacks to the cause of world
peace and security, according to a major international poll released
Wednesday.
The
survey of nearly 22,000 people in 21 countries, conducted by GlobeScan
with the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) of the
University of Maryland for the British Broadcasting Corporation
(BBC), found that pessimists about Bush's impact on global security
outnumbered optimists by more than a two-to-one margin.
"The
research makes very clear that the reelection of Pres. Bush has
further isolated America from the world," said Doug Miller, GlobeScan's
president. "It also supports the view of some Americans that unless
his administration changes its approach to world affairs in its
second term, it will continue to erode America's good name, and
hence its ability to effectively influence world affairs."
Fifty-eight
percent of the respondents predicted that Bush's reelection would
be bad for international peace and security, compared to only 26
percent, concentrated primarily in India (62 percent), the Philippines
(63 percent), and Poland (44 percent), who insisted it would be
good.
The
mammoth poll, which was conducted in each country during December,
also found that 42 percent of respondents worldwide said Bush's
reelection had made them feel worse about the U.S. public, compared
to 25 percent who said it made them feel better, and 23 percent
who said it made no difference.
Global
sentiment also appeared to be overwhelmingly negative about U.S.-led
military operations in Iraq.
Overall,
70 percent of respondents said they were opposed to their countries
contributing troops to the operation. In no country – including
those, like Poland, that are in fact contributing troops in Iraq
– did either a majority or plurality of respondents say they thought
their country should contribute troops.
"This
is quite a grim picture for the U.S.," said PIPA director Steven
Kull, who noted that overwhelming sentiment against sending troops
to Iraq suggested not only that Bush was highly unlikely to sign
up any new volunteers for his dwindling "coalition" in Iraq, but
also that "in the future the prospects for getting foreign participation
in any U.S.-led military operations that is not sanctioned by the
United Nations or some other multilateral body are very poor."
The
poll, which covered Washington's closest allies in Western Europe
and East Asia, as well as several South American countries, Mexico,
South Africa, Lebanon, Russia, Turkey, Australia, South Africa,
China, and India, comes amid indications of growing concerns about
Iraq, in particular, at home.
The
Los Angeles Times Wednesday released its own poll that found
that the percentage of U.S. citizens who believe Iraq was "worth
going to war over" has sunk to a new low of 39 percent, down from
44 percent last October, one month before the presidential elections.
Fifty-six percent now believe the war was a mistake.
Consistent
with the findings of the international poll, the Times survey
also found that nearly twice as many people now believe that the
war in Iraq "destabilized" the Middle East as those who believe
the region has been stabilized, and that two-thirds of the public
believe that the image of the U.S. has been "hurt" by the U.S. intervention.
Only
10 percent said Washington's image had improved, while the remainder
either had no opinion or said it had no impact.
The
GlobeScan-PIPA poll was generally consistent with another survey
the two groups released last September on global attitudes about
the U.S. presidential election.
Carried
out in 35 countries in July and August, that poll found that Massachusetts
Sen. John Kerry was favored over Bush by pluralities or majorities
in 30 countries and by an average of 46 to 20 percent.
Consistent
with latest poll, Kerry was favored by the greatest margins in Europe,
predominantly Muslim countries, and South America, while Bush actually
bested Kerry in only three countries – Philippines, Poland, and
Nigeria. In India, Bush and Kerry were virtually tied.
In
the latest poll, the countries that felt most negative about Bush's
impact on global security included Turkey (82 percent), Argentina
(79 percent), Brazil (78 percent), Germany (77 percent), France
(75 percent), Indonesia (68 percent), although the survey was carried
out before U.S. relief operations after last month's tsunami, Canada
(67 percent), Lebanon and Britain (64 percent), and Chile (62 percent).
Asked
whether Bush's reelection made them feel worse about the U.S. public,
respondents from Turkey (72 percent), France (65 percent), Brazil
(59 percent), and Germany (56 percent) were the most negatively
affected, while only in the Philippines (78 percent) and India (65
percent) did majorities say it made them feel better.
Anti-U.S.
attitudes, however, generally trailed behind the negative attitudes
expressed for Bush in the new poll.
Asked
whether they felt "mainly positive" or "mainly negative" about U.S.
influence in the world, Filipino respondents were by far the most
positive – 88 percent, while majorities ranging from 52 percent
to 56 percent also described U.S. influence as "mainly positive"
in Poland, India, South Africa, and South Korea.
On
the other hand, majorities in 12 countries – ranging from 50 percent
in Chile and Britain to 64 percent in Germany and 65 percent in
Argentina – described U.S. influence as "mainly negative,"
while pluralities in Lebanon, China, and Japan agreed.
"I'm
quite confident that there's never been any period where you could
find such high levels of negative feelings toward the U.S. in polling
data," Kull told IPS, noting, however, that the combined polls do
not yet show that a majority worldwide sees the U.S. as having a
negative influence on the world.
"That
suggests there may be some underlying openness to repairing relations
with the U.S.," he added.
Italy
was found to be the most pro-U.S. Western European country, with
nearly half of respondents insisting that Washington's influence
was still mainly "positive."
In
Britain, Washington's closest ally, the margin was 44 percent positive
versus 50 percent negative; in Australia, it was 40-52, only slightly
more positive than France where the margin was 38-54.
Overall,
the poll found that those with higher education and income levels
tended to be somewhat more negative about Bush's reelection and
to feel worse about U.S. influence. Muslims were much more likely
to be negative on both counts than Christians.
In
addition to the 21 countries surveyed, a poll of 1,000 U.S. respondents
was also carried out. Fifty-six percent of Americans considered
Bush's reelection positive for world security, and 71 percent assessed
the U.S. as having a mainly positive influence.
Countries
least eager to contribute troops to Iraq included Mexico where no
respondent favored the idea, Russia (2 percent), Argentina (3 percent),
Turkey (6 percent), and France, Lebanon, and Chile (9 percent).
Support for troop contributions ran highest in countries that have
contributed troops: Australia (37 percent), Philippines (36 percent),
South Korea (34 percent), Britain (31 percent), and Italy (28 percent).
With
the exception of the Philippines (500), Brazil (800), and Poland
(943), more than 1,000 respondents were surveyed in each country.
Nationwide polls were conducted in all of the industrialized nations
polled, while polling was combined to urban centers in Brazil, Chile,
China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Africa, and Turkey.
January
21, 2005
Jim
Lobe is Inter Press Service's correspondent in Washington, DC.
Copyright
© 2005 Inter Press Service
Jim
Lobe Archives
|