Pentagon Hawk Released Straws in the Wind?
by
Jim Lobe
by Jim Lobe
A
major Pentagon hawk has abruptly resigned his post in a move that,
in the context of other recent developments, is likely to fuel speculation
that the White House might be trying to soften the harder edges
of its controversial policies.
The
Pentagon announced Wednesday evening that Assistant Secretary of
Defense for International Security Policy, J.D. Crouch II, was resigning
effective Friday, in order to return to "academia" at
Southwest Missouri State University (SMSU).
Significantly,
the announcement did not give a reason for his departure nor for
the suddenness with which it is taking place. And no one was named
to replace him.
While
officials stressed that Crouch, who has a long association with
many of the key figures who have promoted military preeminence as
U.S. post-Cold War strategy, was leaving voluntarily, some sources
said his resignation reflected a loss of influence on the part of
right-wing and neo-conservative hawks centered in the Pentagon and
Vice President Dick Cheney's office.
"He's
not being fired, but they're starting to move people around,"
said one knowledgeable source. "It's all about (Bush's) reelection
and how to get rid of the loonies without looking like they screwed
up."
As
assistant secretary, Crouch reported to Undersecretary of Defense
for Policy Douglas Feith, whose office has been responsible for
postwar strategy in Iraq.
Feith
also oversaw the work of the now-disbanded Office of Special Plans
(OSP), which has been charged by retired intelligence and State
Department officials with "cherry-picking" intelligence that bolstered
the case for going to war and sending it directly to Pentagon chief
Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney's office without having it vetted by
professional analysts for credibility.
As
a result, Feith's office has become a major target of critics of
both the war and the postwar situation, which, given its rising
cost in money and the lives of US soldiers, is being blamed for
Bush's plummeting poll numbers.
Crouch,
an arms-control specialist, had very little to do with the preparation
for war against Iraq. But he has long taken what have been regarded
as extreme and extremely unilateralist positions on a number of
key issues.
A
champion of US withdrawal from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM)
treaty, Crouch has supported military action against Cuba; defended
the development of offensive chemical weapons; opposed the Chemical
Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban
Treaty (CTBT); and advocated the development of new nuclear weapons
for such purposes as destroying underground facilities (bunker-busters).
Before
his appointment in 2001, he also strongly criticized the previous
Bush administration decision to withdraw nuclear weapons from South
Korea, and called for Washington to unilaterally destroy suspected
nuclear and missile installations in North Korea unless Pyongyang
complied with an ultimatum to dismantle them.
Crouch's
departure is the latest of a series of developments that suggest
to some analysts that a significant foreign-policy shift is underway.
Those
hints began with the announcement by National Security Adviser Condoleezza
Rice earlier this month of a new interagency committee to coordinate
Iraq policy in the National Security Council. Rumsfeld's unusually
testy reaction to the announcement suggested that the move was more
than cosmetic.
The
next shoe dropped during Bush's recent trip to Asia, where he repeatedly
stressed his willingness to sign a five-nation security guarantee
if North Korea agreed to fully and verifiably dismantle its nuclear
program.
While
this did not go as far as Pyongyang's demand for a bilateral nonaggression
pact, it was a more flexible offer than what Bush had previously
put on the table, prompting Donald Gregg, the chairman of the Korea
Society and a former top aide to George H.W. Bush, to assert that
"a corner has been turned and the administration's pragmatists
are in charge."
In
just the past week, a number of other developments suggested that
the White House was tacking to the middle, away from right-wingers
and neo-conservatives like Crouch and Feith.
Testifying
before Congress on Tuesday, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage
affirmed that Washington was not seeking "regime change"
in Iran and, indeed, expected to engage Tehran in a dialogue over
its nuclear program and other issues shortly.
His
remarks, which appeared to align the administration behind a recent
European initiative on Iraq's nuclear program, also included an
unusually strong denunciation of the Pentagon's decision to negotiate
a cease-fire with an Iraq-based Iranian rebel group during the Iraq
war.
Finally,
Bush's decision Wednesday to "drop by" a meeting between
visiting Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Cao Gangchuan and Rice was
considered particularly disappointing to hawks, who had lobbied
hard against such an encounter.
While
none of these developments by themselves would warrant the conclusion
that the hawks are in decline, the totality suggests that they might
be more than mere straws in the wind.
"This
could be the beginning of a change," says Charles Kupchan, a foreign-policy
analyst at the Council on Foreign Relations. "What's new is that
Bush's poll numbers are nose-diving, and he's scared."
Some
sources say that Robert Blackwill, the administration's former ambassador
to India who was taken on as a senior aide by Rice last month, could
be most responsible for the shifts.
Blackwill,
who was Rice's boss in the National Security Council during the
first Bush administration, is a savvy Republican operator with friends
and protégés in key posts in the national security
bureaucracy and on Capitol Hill. While considered on the right,
he reportedly shares the first Bush's distrust of neo-conservatives,
in particular.
While
Crouch is not considered a neo-conservative, he has long been closely
associated with them.
A
former member of the board of advisers of the Center for Security
Policy (CSP), he worked for former Republican Senator Malcolm Wallop,
a far-right Republican from Cheney's home state of Wyoming, before
joining the Pentagon as the principal deputy assistant secretary
of defense for international security in the first Bush administration.
In
that capacity, he worked under then-Undersecretary for Policy Paul
Wolfowitz, for whom he reportedly helped prepare the controversial
1992 Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) draft.
That
document called for, among other things, Washington to pursue military
dominance in and around Eurasia, carry out preemptive attacks against
potential threats, and to rely more on ad hoc alliances than multilateral
mechanisms like the United Nations or North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) to promote US interests.
When
the paper was leaked to the New York Times that spring, it
was repudiated by the administration, and Wolfowitz the current
deputy defense secretary and Feith's superior and a close
aide, I. Lewis Libby (currently Cheney's chief of staff and national
security adviser) were reportedly almost fired.
Crouch
himself left the Pentagon in July 1992, just three months after
the draft DPG was exposed.
The
current administration's September 2002 National Security Strategy
was based largely on the DPG developed under Wolfowitz, Libby and
Crouch 10 years before.
Crouch
is a longtime protégé of William van Cleave, a nuclear-arms
specialist who played a key role in the mid-1970s in derailing détente
with the Soviet Union, in part by working with Rumsfeld and neo-conservative
hawks in thwarting Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's efforts
to reach a major strategic-arms agreement with the Soviet Union.
Van
Cleave, who heads the SMSU department of defense and strategic studies
to which Crouch will be returning, has been a major, if low-key,
champion of US military dominance and of developing new nuclear
weapons that can be used in conventional warfare.
Van
Cleave also serves on the boards of advisers of the CSP and two
Israel-based institutions closely tied to the right-wing Likud Party
the Ariel Center for Policy Research and the Institute for
Advanced Strategic and Political Studies.
October
31, 2003
Jim
Lobe is Inter Press Service's correspondent in Washington, DC.
Copyright
© 2003 Inter Press Service
Jim
Lobe Archives
|