Once
Again, Democracy Is Not Freedom
(and We Are Not the Government)
by
Jacob G. Hornberger
by Jacob G. Hornberger
President
Bush and his neoconservative supporters were practically teary-eyed
on election day in Iraq. No longer did it matter that the weapons
of mass destruction that had been used to scare the American people
into supporting the war didnt exist. Or that thousands of
U.S. troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis were now dead or maimed.
Or that the Pentagon and CIA had plunged America into a shameful
orgy of torture and sordid sex acts. Or that billions upon billions
of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money were being frittered away, even
while the value of the dollar continued to plummet in international
markets.
No, all that mattered now was that the Iraqi people had finally
been given the opportunity to elect their rulers.
Pardon me for asking some indelicate questions, but under what moral
authority does one nation invade and occupy another nation for the
purpose of conducting a national election, especially when the invasion
and occupation are likely to result in the deaths and maiming of
tens of thousands of people, including American soldiers and Iraqi
citizens? Isn't it possible that those U.S. soldiers would have
placed a higher value on their lives and health than on a national
election in Iraq, especially if they had known prior to the invasion
that they were not protecting America from a WMD attack after all?
Isn't it possible those dead and maimed Iraqis would have preferred
life and health, albeit under tyranny, just as millions of people
in Eastern Europe did through the many decades of the Cold War?
Lets not forget the simple truth that democracy is not freedom.
Thus, the mere fact that many of the Iraqi people voted in a national
election does not mean that Iraqis are now free or that theyre
going to be free in the near future. In fact, given the political
and religious
beliefs of the Shiite group that garnered the most votes,
early indications are exactly the opposite.
What?
you ask. How can that be? Democracy is freedom! President
Bush and our military leaders tell us so.
Unfortunately, however, it just aint so. President Bush and
the Pentagon are as wrong about freedom and democracy as they were
about WMDs in Iraq.
The fact is that democracy is the very worst form of government
there is, except for all the rest, as Winston Churchill once pointed
out. Its only real advantage, as Ludwig von Mises observed, is that
it provides the citizenry with the ability to peacefully change
a regime by voting it out of office. To change a totalitarian regime
almost always entails violence, such as a revolution.
What ultimately matters with respect to freedom is not so much how
a ruler is selected but rather the extent of the rulers powers
once hes installed into office.
Lets assume, for example, that an elected ruler has omnipotent
power over the citizenry. That is, there is no legislature that
enacts laws and no judicial branch to interpret them. Whatever the
ruler says, goes. He rules by decree. He has the power to jail anyone
he wants for any reason whatsoever, to torture people, to punish
critics, to shut down the press and public assemblies, to confiscate
weapons, and to send the nation into war. He has unlimited power
to tax. He even has the power to force people to attend religious
services.
Could people in that society be considered free? President Bush
would undoubtedly say, Yes, because people had the right to
vote, and he was the one who won. And if people feel that their
ruler has abused his powers, they are free to oust him from office
in the next election.
But how can living under dictatorship, albeit democratically elected,
be considered genuine freedom?
Its not difficult to see how our American ancestors felt about
democracy. They considered it so bad that they enacted the Bill
of Rights to protect us from it.
After all, carefully read the Bill of Rights. Youll notice
something interesting: It doesnt give people rights at all.
Instead, it protects us from democracy.
The popular refrain, We are the government, is false
too. After all, if we are the government, then why does the Bill
of Rights protect those of us in the private sector from those in
the government sector?
Will Bushs militarily installed democracy bring freedom to
the Iraqi people? He says it already has, because the Iraqi people
were free to vote. There are strong indications, however, that the
new Iraqi regime intends to establish close ties to the Islamic
regime in Iran, which Bush says is evil and unfree, and may even
mirror many Iranian policies. If that happens, one can only wonder
whether he will change his tune about democracy and freedom, especially
if U.S. troops end up killing and dying both in Iraq and Iran.
March
1, 2005
Jacob
Hornberger [send him mail]
is founder and president of The Future
of Freedom Foundation.
Copyright
© 2005 Future of Freedom Foundation
Jacob
Hornberger Archives
|