Mr. President, the CIA Is Already Talking to Syria
by
Jacob G. Hornberger
by Jacob G. Hornberger
DIGG THIS
President
Bush has decided that the U.S. government is now going to talk to
Syria. The reason the president has steadfastly refused to talk
to Syria before now is that Syria, he has repeatedly emphasized,
is a state sponsor of terrorism.
There is one
part of all this, however, that is quite befuddling: The U.S. government
has already been talking to Syria, at least if the CIA is still
considered part of the U.S. government.
If you dont
believe me, just ask Maher Arar. He is the Canadian citizen who
was kidnapped by U.S. officials while changing planes in New York
on an international flight back to Canada, his country of citizenship.
After U.S. officials accused Arar of being a terrorist, the CIA
forcibly boarded him onto one of its rendition planes
and flew him to be tortured in Syria. Yes, Syria! Thats
the country that President Bush has repeatedly said that the U.S.
government would not talk to because it is a state sponsor of terrorism!
Why did the
CIA deliver Arar to Syria, instead of, say, France? Because Syrian
officials are renowned for being excellent torturers, which shouldnt
be too surprising, given that they are also renowned for being excellent
terrorists. Who better to torture someone than a state sponsor of
terrorism?
Youve
probably already grasped my point: In order to make the arrangements
to have Arar tortured to get information from him, CIA officials
had to have talked to Syrian officials. Those talks had to have
encompassed discussions about torturing Arar and how information
acquired from him would be transmitted back to U.S. officials. After
all, its not as though the CIA would have just flown into
Syrian airspace without permission, dropped off a complete stranger
at the Syrian airport, and said goodbye. No, there had to be detailed
discussions between certain officials of the CIA and certain officials
of the Syrian government.
But how does
something like this happen? Doesnt it almost defy credulity?
Why, here you have a regime that the president repeatedly condemns
as a state sponsor of terrorism and with whom the U.S. government
simply is not going to communicate. Meanwhile, CIA officials, somehow
or other, cut a deal with Syrian officials to torture a citizen
of Canada on behalf of the U.S. government.
Who were those
Syrian officials who cut the torture deal with the CIA? Were there
negotiations over which torture techniques would be used? Waterboarding?
Electric shocks to the genitals? Forced nudity? Isolation and sensory
deprivation? What did the Syrian government get out of the deal?
Was it paid for its services and, if so, in what form? Was the contract
put into writing? Did CIA officials monitor performance of the contract?
How much information was acquired and how was it transmitted from
Syria to the CIA? Did President Bush approve the deal?
Unfortunately,
we dont know the answers to any of those questions because
the mainstream press has simply chosen not to ask them. Wouldnt
you think that just one reporter would ask, Mr. President,
how can you say that you havent been talking to Syria when
in fact your CIA officials obviously talked to Syria when they cut
their torture deal regarding Maher Arar?
Better yet,
what would be wrong with a full investigation by Congress into the
kidnapping, rendition, and torture of Maher Arar, who, by the way,
was ultimately exonerated of any involvement in terrorism? It could
begin by subpoenaing every CIA official involved in the matter,
who could be required to describe under oath in a public hearing
all the details of the torture agreement that was cut with a terrorist
regime with whom President Bush has, until now, supposedly refused
to communicate.
Now that President
Bush is talking to Syria, wouldnt it be a good idea if he
and the CIA talked to the American people about the deal they cut
with Syria to torture Maher Arar?
March
5, 2007
Jacob
Hornberger [send him mail]
is founder and president of The Future
of Freedom Foundation. He will be among the 22 speakers at FFF’s
upcoming conference on June 14 in Reston, Virginia: “Restoring
the Constitution: Foreign Policy and Civil Liberties.”
Copyright
© 2007 Future of Freedom Foundation
Jacob
Hornberger Archives
|