Where There’s Smoke, There’s Ire
by
Paul Hein
by Paul Hein
Hollywood
is being asked to clean up its act. Well, that’s nothing new, of
course, but the emphasis now is upon the film industry’s effect
upon impressionable youth. There is agreement, it seems, that youngsters
are very easily influenced by what they see in films, and apt to
imitate their favorite stars. It’s got some people very worried.
For
instance: in a modern film, teen-agers might see a couple kissing,
undressing, and making love. The camera will not turn away from
their nudity or their actions. Moreover, the man and woman are not
married at least to each other. Everything is shown, nothing is
held back, even and this is almost too ghastly to mention the
post-coital cigarette. Is there no decency at all? Smoking, right
out in the open, for kids to see!
Oh,
the sex and nudity are OK, but the smoking has got to stop. A lot
of people are very upset that our children are seeing their favor
actors not just naked or fornicating, but smoking. Dreadful!
You
might be surprised that so much information has been collected on
this subject. People with nothing better to do, apparently, have
been counting the times when actors light up on the screen. It’s
very impressive. For example: in 250 films, 3,346 "occurrences"
of tobacco use, or imagery (?) occurred. And nearly half of these
involved smoking or chewing by a major or minor character. A fifth
of the incidents involved background tobacco imagery, whatever that
is. Most tobacco use was cigarette smoking (69%), with cigars a
distant second, at 20%. Of the 250 most profitable movies released
in the period from 1988 to 1997, 95% of them showed people using
tobacco. (We don’t know the percentage that showed attractive people
drinking whiskey, or exceeding the speed limit, or spitting on the
sidewalk, or picking their noses, but it’s the smoking that we’re
supposed to worry about, I guess.)
There’s
more smoking in R-rated movies than others, for some reason. Our
young people will not only associate smoking with sex, therefore,
but perhaps with other activities, such as serial killing, torture,
execution (the grim executioner offering the victim a last cigarette
as the firing squad assembles) and various other unsavory activities,
none of which seem to arouse too much indignation, except as they
may involve smoking.
What
to do about this problem? There are four recommendations: First,
certify in the credits that nobody received anything from the tobacco
companies in return for showing cigarettes in the picture. Second,
require strong anti-tobacco ads to run before films with any tobacco
shown in the picture. Third, don’t identify brands. Generic cigarettes
only. Four, rate any film which contains smoking R.
Another
approach to the "problem" might be to ignore it. After
all, as the statistics show, most smoking occurs in R movies already.
Besides, what could be sillier than giving movies like Going My
Way, or Lassie, an R rating because somebody in the film is seen
lighting up? And if children are going to smoke because movie heroes/heroines
do it, does it matter what brand they smoke? Besides, its naïve
to think that disclaimers or anti-smoking ads will make much difference,
although if delivered by an appealing character puffing on a pipe
it might help. And I think it would tax credulity if the executioner
asked the condemned man if he’d like a last mint.
I
attend so few movies that my advice to the film industry can indeed,
certainly will be ignored. I would suggest fewer offensive four-letter
words. One reason I rarely go to movies is because I won’t pay someone
seven or eight bucks to be embarrassed or annoyed. And ease up on
the sex. We know what goes on in the bedroom; graphic demonstrations
aren’t needed. And when there’s shooting and other mayhem, we don’t
need to see every bullet hole and bloody wound. And how about stories
that depict noble and elevated behavior instead of the base and
unworthy?
Clean
up Hollywood? By all means. Banning smoking in movies is a good
idea, of course: maybe number 20 on a list of twenty things Hollywood
ought to do to merit our respect. Turn out revolting dreck, but,
please! no smoking!
October
4, 2003
Dr.
Hein [send
him mail] is a semi-retired ophthalmologist in St. Louis,
and the author of All
Work & No Pay.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Paul
Hein Archives
|