A.M.D.G.
by
Paul Hein
by Paul Hein
DIGG THIS
A few years
ago I found myself confronting, and confronted by, the Administrative
Hearing Commission (AHC) of the state of Missouri. In fact, I’ve
found myself in that position
a couple of times.
The AHC is,
as the name indicates, an agency of the state’s Administration,
but it operates as a "court," in a dispute between the
state and a Missourian reckless enough to challenge it in some way.
As an "impartial" arbiter, it hears witnesses, acts upon
motions, and, eventually, rules in favor of the state, unless the
matter under discussion is trivial and presents no fundamental or
significant challenge to the operation of that corporation. For
it to do otherwise is impossible. Would a committee established
and operated by General Motors to settle disputes with motorists
recommend that the operation of GM is fundamentally improper, and
should cease?
Nonetheless,
participation in the AHC charade is interesting and informative,
giving the individual petitioner the chance to see, via discovery,
the state’s "evidence," and to learn, via interrogatories,
which questions the state cannot and will not answer. So I filed
numerous papers with the "court," and, mindful of my high
school days, when we students at St. Louis University High School
were admonished to head our assignments with the initials A.M.D.G.,
placed those initials at the top of each motion.
The initials
stand for Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam: for the greater glory of God.
I was slightly surprised to receive an interrogatory from the lawyer
representing the state, asking what A.M.D.G. meant. Surely someone
among the army of flunkies in the State House must know! Apparently
not. At any rate, I promptly forgot about it.
But
I noticed, belatedly, that the AHC has a motto at the top of its
pages, also. It surrounds an image of two bears facing one another,
with the words United We Stand, Divided We Fall. But, in a ribbon
below the image, is the Latin motto: Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto.
My high-school Latin makes that: Let the Welfare of the People be
the Supreme Law.
I was reminded
of the admonition: a man cannot serve two masters. As a God-fearing
man, I serve the Lord as best I can. That is my "supreme law."
The state, on the other hand, at least in its AHC incarnation, serves
man. It seems that people have an innate, intuitive desire to worship,
and serve, something, or someone. What a pity when it’s the state!
Most Americans
claim a belief in God, but, even in the case of many modern churches,
that belief in God translates into working for a more perfect world:
one free of hunger, disease, injustice, etc. To those not blessed
with a belief in God, man’s innate attraction to good leads in a
similar direction. To many such as these, government is the instrument
to bring this about. Religious men and women, admittedly, have also
concerned themselves with the material concerns of their fellow
men, not as an end in itself, but as a work of mercy that might
lead the donor to greater virtue, and the beneficiary to a knowledge
and appreciation of divine mercy. Government, however, tolerates
no competition. It is doubtless unlawful for any government agency
to act for the greater glory of God! And in practice, government
cannot operate on behalf of the welfare of its subjects without
committing, routinely and inevitably, gross injustice. What it gives
to Paul, it can only take from Peter, and all the statutes in the
world cannot make that right; especially when the statutes which
justify robbing Peter are written by the robbers themselves—who
also administer and enforce the theft, and, if challenged, don their
black robes and judge it proper.
Thus, the motto
of the AHC is an oxymoron. The state – any state – is created to
guarantee justice; to preserve basic human rights. But the AHC,
or any state agency, can only achieve the welfare of some citizens
at the expense of others. Therefore, the "supreme law"
would seem to call for theft under color of law. "Let the Welfare
of SOME People Be the Supreme Law!"
We have come
full circle. Governments, which our ancestors established, perhaps
naïvely, to insure justice, have become, of necessity, the greatest
violators of justice. And this cannot be remedied, short of abolishing
modern government, if not all government. As long as our rulers
regard the ill, the uneducated, the poor, or any other group with
a grievance, or who can be made to regard themselves as victims,
as persons whose welfare is the government’s concern, injustice
is guaranteed and inevitable. And this injustice will be foisted
upon the public with the grandest of slogans: Salus Populi Suprema
Lex Esto!
What Al Capone
needed was a nifty motto, especially in Latin!
May
10, 2007
Dr.
Hein [send
him mail] is a retired ophthalmologist in St. Louis,
and the author of All
Work & No Pay.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Paul
Hein Archives
|