Getting the Little Things Wrong
by
Paul Hein
by Paul Hein
DIGG THIS
The government
is rarely, if ever, asked to justify its existence. That’s probably
for the best: imagine the consternation if the current crop of candidates
were asked to tell us why we have government in the first place!
What good is it?
Those with
more than half a dozen functioning neurons, however, would probably
give the answer, "The government exists to protect the rights
of the people," or words to that effect. And indeed, that’s
what government does, at least for some of the people, some of the
time. (We must not consider what it does to the rest of the people
the rest of the time!)
For instance,
the government’s attacks upon Afghanistan and Iraq would undoubtedly
be justified by claiming that those two dreadfully powerful countries
were, somehow, inimical to the safety and security of We the People,
and therefore had to be destroyed. It’s for our own good, you see!
A large percentage
of the people will swallow this line, at least in the beginning.
After all, there is a certain grandeur in spending billions of dollars,
and using high technology, to devastate enemy cities even if there
is no enemy. Maybe, in some perverse way, these assaults trigger
a feeling of pride: Look what we can do!
But if we step
back from the really BIG picture, and look at the little homespun
ways that government interacts with us, the idea of government for
protection fades, or disappears altogether.
A
case in point: automobile licensure. I have received, from the Department
of Revenue (NOT a department of public safety!), a notice regarding
the renewal of my automobile license. It states, with regard to
the form that accompanied it, "These boxes contain information
you MUST read. Items listed must be submitted with your renewal
in order for it to be processed." Those items are: personal
property tax receipts (marked paid, of course) for the prior two
years, proof of insurance, safety inspection certificate (passed,
of course) and emissions testing (also passed, of course!).
It could be
claimed that the safety and emissions tests contribute to public
health and protection, but I know of no evidence of that. Nor is
any account taken of the fact that the car in question is driven
about 2500 miles per year, as opposed to smoke-belching trucks and
busses, which drive tens of thousands of miles yearly.
I appreciate
that a license plate can be valuable to police seeking to recover
a stolen car, or apprehend bank robbers or other felons escaping
by automobile. But that surely does not, in any significant way,
contribute to my safety. Is it my responsibility to make the cops’
work easier? And besides, an automobile can be readily identified
by a license plate that does not change during the lifetime of the
vehicle. Changing the plate, or the stickers which indicate the
year of expiration of that plate, only confuses the situation. My
new stickers, for example, have different numbers than the old ones too
small to read, in any event, unless you’re within a few feet of
the plate. Somebody, I assume, has to keep a record of the number
on the new stickers, relating them to me, and my car, and changing
them every year or two. How in the world does this contribute to
my safety? And remember, protecting the public is the purpose, we’re
told, of government.
Well, it’s
all pretty obvious, isn’t it? Licensure of automobiles (among other
forms of licensure!) is just an income-producing racket. It’s a
business. For about 120 bux, total, I got the two dandy stickers
now adorning my license plates. What makes it a state business,
instead of a legitimate one, is that I had no option of declining
to purchase these costly little devices. They benefit me in no way
whatsoever, but were I to decline to buy them, sooner or later the
state would punish me, in various ways that would be legal, because
the state makes the laws. Come to think of it, that’s why I have
to buy the stickers: it’s the law and guess who made that law?
If you want
to see government for what it really is, look at the little picture.
October
11, 2006
Dr.
Hein [send
him mail] is a retired ophthalmologist in St. Louis,
and the author of All
Work & No Pay.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Paul
Hein Archives
|