|
Why Is Wal-Mart Being Regarded as Despicable?
by
Leon Hadar
by Leon Hadar
Forget about
Osama bin Laden and his associates hiding somewhere. Pay very little
attention to the growing nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran.
And you should place concerns over the rise of China as a "peer
competitor" on the bottom of US policy agenda.
The Clear and
Present Danger that is facing the American people has nothing to
do with international terrorism, rogue regimes, weapons of mass
destruction (WMD), or even the "outsourcing" of American
jobs to India.
It's Wal-Mart!
Are we talking
about the world's largest retailer, with US$285.2 billion in sales
in last year's fiscal year that employs 1.6 million associates worldwide
through more than 3,800 facilities in the United States and more
than 2,400 units in other countries? Is that the company that was
founded by the legendary Sam Walton and which promises "Every
Day Low Prices?"
You may be
one of the 138 million customers who shops at Wal-Mart in one of
its worldwide stores every week, but you probably don't know what's
good for you or for that matter, for the "public." So
pick up the local daily newspaper in Small-Town America and you'll
discover that Wal-Mart is the fifth Horseman of the Apocalypse.
Indeed, it's riding into your neighborhood and threatening to destroy
jobs and prosperity and the American Way of Life. Be afraid – very
afraid.
Just to make
sure that this dire message gets across to the American people,
there are quite a few consumer groups, lobbying organizations, websites
and blogs that are leading a brutal campaign against Wal-Mart. Google
"Wal-Mart" and you'll discover Wakeup Wal-Mart.com ("We
are the ones who shop at Wal-Mart . . . Together, we have the power
to change Wal-Mart. Together, we can hold Wal-Mart accountable and
improve our America."); Walmart.Watch.com (which "invites
your ideas, participation, and commitment to establishing higher
standards for the world's largest company"); and Wal-Mart.blows.com
("The premise is simple; I hate Walmart! Walmart Sucks! Wal-Mart
can kiss the fattest part of my xxx . . . This site will bring you
the latest Wal-Mart news, allow you to post your rant in the public
forum, and give you a warm fuzzy feeling inside. This website is
dedicated to giving a voice to Wal-Mart associates. You deserve
to be heard.").
And, hey, there
is even a movie: Wal-Mart:
The High Cost of Low Price. A feature-length documentary,
produced by Robert Greenwald and which "uncovers a retail giant's
assault on families and American values" has been screened
in movie theaters across the country to rave reviews. Ebert and
Roeper gave it "two thumbs up" and the New York Times
called it "breathtaking!" What's next? A television sitcom
or reality show? A computer game? A hip-hop hit?
Just recently,
the legislative assembly of the state of Maryland, in which I reside,
became the first state in the nation to approve legislation forcing
Wal-Mart to pay more for its employee health care, potentially paving
the way for other states to follow suit.
The bill, which
passed despite a veto by Republican Governor Robert Ehrlich, requires
employers with more than 10,000 workers to spend at least 8 per
cent of their payroll on employee health care or else pay into a
fund for the uninsured. Only Wal-Mart is affected by the legislation.
("Guys, what about fixing those potholes on our roads?").
Critics of
Wal-Mart allege that much of the company's financial success is
due to business practices harmful to employees, the community, the
American and global economy, and the environment. More specifically,
American bashers of the retail giant have argued that Wal-Mart is
responsible for the job losses in the US, an issue that was the
subject of a recent Frontline documentary, Is Wal-Mart Good for
America?, on US public television.
"Wal-Mart's
power and influence are awesome," said Hedrick Smith, a former
New York Times correspondent who produced the program. "By
figuring out how to exploit two powerful forces that converged in
the 1990s – the rise of IT and the explosion of the global economy
– Wal-Mart has dramatically changed the balance in the world of
business. Retailers are now more powerful than manufacturers, and
they are forcing the decision to move production offshore."
Most of the
experts that Smith interviewed agreed that Wal-Mart changed, if
not revolutionized, the way business is done.
"Wal-Mart
has reversed a hundred-year history that had the retailer dependent
on the manufacturer," explained Nelson Lichtenstein, a professor
at the University of California, Santa Barbara. "Now the retailer
is the center, the power, and the manufacturer becomes the serf,
the vassal, the underling who has to do the bidding of the retailer.
That's a new thing."
To understand
the secret of Wal-Mart's success, Smith traveled from the company's
headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, to their global procurement
center in Shenzhen, China, where several hundred employees work
to keep the company's import pipeline running smoothly. Of Wal-Mart's
6,000 global suppliers, experts estimate that as many as 80 per
cent are based in China.
"Wal-Mart
has a very close relationship with China," said Duke University
professor Gary Gereffi. "China is the largest exporter to the
US economy in virtually all consumer goods categories. Wal-Mart
is the leading retailer in the US economy in virtually all consumer
goods categories. Wal-Mart and China are a joint venture."
Indeed, Wal-Mart
estimates it imports US$15 billion of Chinese goods every year and
concedes that the figure could be higher – some estimates range
as high as US$20 billion or even US$30 billion. "We do depend
on products from around the globe to draw our consumers into the
stores," said Ray Bracy, Wal-Mart's vice-president for federal
and international public affairs. "We feel they need to have
the best product, the best value, at the best price we can achieve."
Which means
that Wal-Mart has been doing exactly what American and global capitalism
expects successful companies to do – that is, offer consumers a
wide range of products at low prices.
There
is no doubt that a dynamic free-market economy also produces some
losers in the form of declining industries and unemployed workers,
but the overall progress that results from Wal-Mart's operations
in the US and around the world, including China, benefits a huge
number of Americans and Chinese.
Moreover, as
Thomas DiLorenzo – an economist with the Mises Institute and author
of How
Capitalism Saved America: The Untold Story of Our Country's History,
from the Pilgrims to the Present (Crown Forum/Random House,
August 2004) – notes, the campaign against Wal-Mart is "primarily
a labor union-inspired campaign against Wal-Mart employees,"
as well as the company in general.
Hence the main
lobbyists in favor of the legislation passed in the Maryland assembly
– which would force Wal-Mart to provide its workers with expensive,
government-prescribed health insurance – have been the labor unions
which provide financial backing to politicians in the state.
"The
ultimate goal is to get the company to sign a union contract without
ever involving the employees themselves," according to DiLorenzo,
who argues that the whole idea of a corporate campaign is based
on a Big Lie: that the union is somehow concerned about the well-being
of non-union employees at places like Wal-Mart.
"In reality,
the objective of the union is to force every one of those employees
to either join its union (and pay its expensive dues) or become
unemployed," he argues.
January
28, 2006
Leon
Hadar [send him mail] is
Washington correspondent for the Business
Times of Singapore and the author of Sandstorm:
Policy Failure in the Middle East (Palgrave Macmillan). Visit
his blog.
Copyright
© 2006 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved. Reprinted
with permission of the author.
Leon
Hadar Archives
|