'Contempt
of Cop'
by
William Norman Grigg
by William Norman Grigg
Recently by William Norman Grigg: Helot
on Wheels
"The police
are to the government as the edge is to the knife," insists sociologist
David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical
tax-feeder isn't the sharpest blade in the cutlery drawer.
One suitable
example is the specimen who ruined what was an otherwise pleasant
drive to northern Idaho last Friday night (September 18) – a fellow
whose finely honed sense of unearned privilege coexisted with an
intellect whose acuity was roughly the same as that of a rusty butter
knife.
I was part
of a small group traveling to the tiny but beautiful village of
Potlatch, where I
was to give the keynote address at the Liberty Roundup, a forum
featuring candidates for state and congressional offices.
My friend Scott
Watson was behind the wheel, my wife Korrin and our seven-month-old
son in the backseat. We had just passed through Lapwai when we caught
the dreaded sight of running lights in our rear-view mirror.
Scott pulled
to the side of the road onto a shoulder that proved too narrow to
accommodate the donut-burner as he went through the familiar shakedown
ritual. Thus instead of approaching the driver-side window, the
officer – an officer of the Nez Perce Tribal Police – tapped insistently
on the window next to me.
Yeah, I'll
bet that this is going to go really well, I thought grimly
to myself as I rolled down the window.
"What's your
hurry?" began the officer, reciting directly from the big book of
police clichés in a voice heavy with affected heartiness.
"I'm not
in a hurry," Scott said in a composed but slightly annoyed voice,
reflecting his commendable dislike of being patronized.
"Well, I have
you going 72 in a 55," the officer continued in the same contrived
tone. (This was untrue; we were in a 65 MPH zone, as the GPS on
Scott's dashboard demonstrated.) He then asked where we were headed,
then paused while Scott busied himself procuring the required documents.
The officer then cast a glance around the interior.
"Oh, and I'll
need to see ID for the passengers as well," he said casually.
Here we
go, I thought.
"Why is that
necessary?" I inquired in a level, formal tone.
"Because I
told you so," the officer said with a slight edge to his voice, as
if that settled the matter.
It didn't.
"I'm going
to need a better reason than that," I explained in the same tone
I had previously used.
During the
pause that followed, I saw the officer's lips compress in frustration
and color begin to flood the part of his face that was visible.
"The Idaho
State Code requires that citizens present identification when ordered
to by a law enforcement officer!" he hissed. "If you'd like, I'll
bring the Code book and show you!"
"Yes, that
would be nice," I said blithely, handing him Korrin's driver's license
and my official state ID card (but not my license).
The officer
(who made a point of keeping his badge, and thus his own identification,
out of view) collected the paperwork.
"You just helped
your friend get a ticket," he grunted in my direction as he turned
toward his vehicle.
A few minutes
later the officer's voice was heard behind Scott's car:
"Mr. Watson,
would you step out of your vehicle? I want to speak with you for
a minute."
Scott – an
exceptionally level-headed fellow – shook his head and let out an
exasperated sigh as he exited the car.
"What is he
doing with Scott?" Korrin asked me.
"He's back
there playing some kind of alpha-male game," I replied, predicting
that he'd find some way to do Scott a "favor" in expectation of
Scott's submissive gratitude.
To Scott's
considerable credit, he remained utterly stolid in the face of the
armed stranger's posturing. When he came back to the car, he was
even more disgusted than he had been when he left – even though
he brought the welcome news that he was not getting a ticket.
As he handed our ID cards back to Korrin and me, Scott related the
conversation to us.
"The first
thing he asked me was, 'How do you know William Grigg?'" Scott reported.
"I told him, 'Will is a friend of mine.' Then he said, 'Well, you
tell him that next time he encounters law enforcement, he'd better
cool it!' Then he said that I wasn't going to get a ticket
because I had been 'cooperative,' but warned that there were two
state troopers between here and Lewiston and that they'd stop me
if I went as much as three miles over the speed limit, so I'd better
be careful."
Of course,
the officer lied when he promised to show me the section of the Idaho
State Code supposedly requiring passengers to produce identification,
as I expected him to.
I didn't press
the matter as forcefully as I could have because, after all, I wasn't
the driver; I was willing to push back hard enough to make a point,
but didn't want to cause further trouble for Scott.
The officer
also lied when he said that his demand was backed by statutory authority.
There is no section of the Idaho State Code that authorizes law
enforcement to demand identification from a passenger in a vehicle,
or the typical citizen on the street.
"A peace officer
can require a person to display ID in a bar, or from someone who
is driving a motor vehicle," explained Sgt. Clarence Costner of
the Payette County Sheriff's Office in reply to my inquiry. "Officers
can also check ID when there is probable cause of some kind that
leads to an investigation of a crime – for instance, there's been
a burglary in a neighborhood, and someone might fit a suspect description.
And of course, they can check ID on a consensual basis, the same
way they can carry out a search."
However, Sgt.
Costner emphasized, "there is no physical law that says people have
to display ID on demand unless they're driving a vehicle."
"What about
a passenger riding in an automobile?" I specified.
"No – you don't
have to display ID as a passenger; only as a driver," repeated Sgt.
Costner.
Locke defines
tyranny as power exercised beyond right. The officer who demanded
my ID was acting as a petty tyrant. Had he threatened me with arrest
for refusing to produce it, he would have committed a crime specifically
defined in the Idaho State Code: Title
18, section 703 provides that "Every public officer ... who,
under the pretense or color of any process or other legal authority,
arrests any person or detains him against his will ... without a
regular process or other lawful authority therefor, is guilty
of a misdemeanor."
The presumptuous
intrusiveness of the officer who stopped us reflects a martial law
mindset: Like most law enforcement officers, he sees himself as
a caste apart from, and set above, the "civilian" population, and
thus empowered to command submission from us.
More to the
point: He sees himself as possessing innate authority, rather than
authority derived from the law. He is the law, at least in
the theater of his small and otherwise uncluttered mind. Note how
his idea of a legal warrant is the phrase, "Because I told you to."
My polite but
pointed rejoinder was based on the tacit but clearly understood
question, quo warranto? – By what authority are you making
this demand? This dispelled the officer's pretense that he is somebody
to whom reflexive obedience is due, as opposed to someone whose
authority – such as it is – must be considered derivative, limited,
and conditional.
Sure, the officer
succeeded in securing cooperation through a lie. But the frustration-inspired
threat of collective punishment – "You just helped your friend get
a ticket!" – and the impotent warning, delivered from a safe distance
by way of my friend Scott ("tell your friend he'd better cool it!")
give some indication, I suspect, of how deeply this encounter injured
the officer's unearned sense of self-regard. Most acts of lawless
police violence are committed in the service of that self-image,
which is endlessly reinforced through training and peer socialization.
In 1992, amid
a growing scandal provoked by a wave of criminal violence committed
by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, an investigation
was conducted under the leadership of James
G. Kolts, a conservative Republican retired L.A. County Superior
Court Judge who had been appointed by Ronald Reagan.
The resulting
358-page "Kolts Report" described a
department that behaved in a manner largely indistinguishable from
the conduct of a Third World death squad: Beatings, extra-judicial
killings, planting evidence, robberies, and other undisguised criminal
actions were commonplace; they almost always went unpunished, and
were often rewarded.
One particularly
notorious officer, Paul Archambault, was a serial killer with a badge
who twice gunned down unarmed, harmless people with extreme prejudice
(in one case pausing to re-load before commenting, "He’s still
moving" an unleashing a second volley).
On one occasion,
as sheriff's deputies pumped round after round into a man named
Hyong Po Lee following a pursuit, one San Jose police officer who
witnessed the event commented to another: "We just observed the
sheriffs execute someone." In the year prior to the formation of
the Kolts Commission, there were several instances in which deputies
back-shot unarmed people; none of the shooters was ever disciplined
in any way, let alone prosecuted.
Summary execution
was not the only distinguishing activity of the LASO's under Sheriff
Sherman Block. In April 1989, a man named Demetrio Carillo was seized
and beaten after he rebuked deputies for driving on the sidewalk
near his home – one of many to face summary "street justice" for
"mouthing off." Deputies were taught by Field Training Officers
how to falsify official reports to justify an arrest after the fact
when the real purpose of the arrest was to punish anyone who refused
to display the required deference.
"This is the
worst aspect of police culture, where the worst crime of all is
'contempt of cop,'" observed the Kolts Report. "The officer cannot
let pass the slightest challenge or failure immediately to comply.
It is here that excessive force starts and needs to be stopped."
The endless
parade of abuses inflicted by police on citizens who fail to display
the required docility testifies that this "aspect of police culture"
has replicated itself nation-wide. In the company of my wife, our
infant child, and a close friend, I encountered it just north of
Lapwai, Idaho last Friday night. Things could have turned out much
worse. Next time, they probably will.
September
23, 2009
William
Norman Grigg [send him mail]
publishes the Pro
Libertate blog and hosts the Pro
Libertate radio program.
Copyright
© 2009 William Norman Grigg
The
Best of William Norman Grigg
|