Beware
William Tell's Second Arrow
by
William Norman Grigg
by William Norman Grigg
Recently by William Norman Grigg: A
Covenant With Death
"You Swiss
are so proud of your 500,000-man citizen militia.... But what will
you do if a 1,000,000-man German Army comes marching across your
border?"
"That's
easy. Each of us will shoot twice, and go home."
~ A reported
conversation between a German and a Swiss diplomat, circa 1939
Seven hundred
years ago, when Switzerland was under the domination of the Hapsburgs,
a dissolute colonial overlord named Hermann Gessler sought to humiliate
the residents of Altdorf, the capital of the central Swiss canton
of Uri.
Gessler instructed
his minions to erect a tall pole in the town square, at the top
of which would be displayed his cap. Every Swiss man who entered
the square would be required to pay fealty to Gessler, and the foreign
imperial power he represented, by bowing before his cap.
One local resident
was a man who distinguished himself by both his virtuosity with
a crossbow and his contemptuous hostility toward bullies. Trying
to force him to genuflect before another man, let alone his empty
cap, would be a bit like trying to relocate the Matterhorn one shovel-full
at a time. So while others prostrated themselves before Gessler's
headwear, William Tell stood erect, burly arms folded across his
broad chest, slowly shaking his head as his derisive laughter echoed
through the town square.
Tell's defiance
became known to Gessler, as did his reputation as a marksman. The
Hapsburg stooge was worried about the possibility of Tell's rebellion
becoming contagious. Endowed with the vicious creativity that so
often replaces character in creatures of his kind, Gessler abducted
Tell's young son, forcing William to leave his mountain home and
stand before him.
Gessler told
Tell that his son would be placed in the town square with an apple
atop his head. Tell was placed at a considerable distance from his
son and told that he was to shoot the apple from his child's head;
failure to do so on his first shot would bring about the death of
his son at the hands of Gessler's soldiers.
According to
the legend, Tell hesitated not at all in fitting an arrow to his
crossbow and letting fly, cleaving the apple without harming his
child.
Tell's feat,
and the composure with which he carried it off, were sufficient
to impress even the porcine, self-enraptured Gessler.
As Tell collected
his son and turned to leave, a second arrow fell from his coat.
Noticing this, a puzzled Gessler asked Tell why he'd bothered to
grab a second arrow, since the first shot would either have succeeded
or brought about the death of his son.
Fixing the
despot with an unflinching stare, Tell replied: "That second arrow
was for you, if the first had wounded my boy."
Not long afterward,
Tell's second arrow found its intended destination as Tell and his
countrymen rose up against the foreign occupation, leading to the
eventual creation of the Swiss Confederacy in the late 13th Century.
Owing to its
tradition of resolute individualism, the unexcelled marksmanship
of its citizen militia, and its decentralized political system,
the Swiss have managed to avoid entanglement in the affairs of other
nations and preserve their independence from foreign domination.
Efforts have
been made to break Switzerland to the saddle of "internationalism":
In 1798, the French revolutionary army invaded and occupied Switzerland,
inflicting on it a centralized "Helvetic Republic" that lasted five
years.
In 1939, as
recounted in Stephen
P. Halbrook's book Target: Switzerland, the German military
drew up plans to invade and occupy Switzerland in the mistaken belief
that its citizen militia would be no match for the Wehrmacht.
Under the leadership
of Colonel Henri Guisan (at the time, it was the tradition that
no officer would be appointed "general" unless the country actually
went to war), the militia prepared a strategy called the "national
redoubt": In the event of a German invasion, the militia would retreat
into a series of fortified installations in the Alps and wage unremitting
guerrilla war for as long as it took to drive the invaders from
their land.
Confronting
the prospect of fighting an entire country under arms, and horrified
by the price that would be paid to pry the Swiss militia from its
Alpine redoubts, the German High Command decided to leave Switzerland
alone. What this means, of course, is that Switzerland actually
won its war without suffering the hideous losses inflicted on any
of the combatant nations.
A
decade ago, another campaign – this one more subtle than threats
of military occupation – was mounted to destroy Swiss independence.
Beginning in 1997, Switzerland, which rescued tens of thousands
of Jews from the Holocaust, was besieged by spurious claims that
its renowned banking system was hoarding gold stolen from victims
of the Nazis.
Stories were
put into circulation describing the cynical heartlessness of banking
officials in turning away aging survivors of Nazi cruelty; those
stories invariably proved to be as substantial as cotton candy and
as reliable as Jim
Cramer's investment advice.
Nonetheless,
a global campaign of defamation and invective, spearheaded by the
coprogenetic Edgar Bronfman Sr. and eagerly abetted by the Clinton
administration, indelibly branded the Swiss as Holocaust profiteers,
thereby setting the stage for a shake-down that continues to this
day.
No matter that
on three prior occasions – in 1946, as a result of the post-WWII
Washington Accord; in the mid-1950s; and in 1962 – the Swiss banking
industry had conducted comprehensive, diligent, and transparent
investigations regarding its wartime gold holdings.
Nor did it
matter that the Clinton administration's inquiry actually exonerated
the Swiss of claims that they had hoarded "victim gold" stolen from
Jews who suffered and perished at the hands of the Nazis. The defamation
campaign succeeded in prying some $14 billion worth of gold from
the Swiss treasury and – more importantly – inducing the Swiss electorate
to enact a new constitution that (among other dreadful features)
repudiated the link between the Swiss franc and gold.
The Imperial
Regime in Washington apparently believes it has reduced the heroic
Swiss to a state of subservience, because its most recent demands
savor of the same arrogant, unwarranted self-assurance that led
Herr Gessler to place his hat atop the pole in Altdorf's town square.
Last year,
Washington tried to impose a $780 million fine on the Swiss for
their refusal to enforce U.S. tax laws within their own country.
Next week,
the Regime intends to press its claims in court – that is, in its
own courts – in the hope of forcing the Swiss to turn over confidential
information on some 52,000 Americans who have private accounts protected
by Swiss law.
To their eternal
credit, and the benefit of those who cherish freedom everywhere,
the Swiss are responding to Washington's imperial bullying with
the equivalent of William Tell's laughter, augmented by an upraised
middle digit.
Earlier this
year, the Swiss People's Party (SVP) began
a campaign urging their fellow citizens and elected leaders to resist
Washington's imperial blackmail. After the Swiss government
capitulated in late February to Washington's demand to pay a $780
million fine and disgorge the names of Americans who had opened
private banking accounts, the SVP – the nation's largest political
party, which combines traditionalist populism with enticing hints
of libertarianism – angrily demanded the repatriation of Swiss gold
stored in the Swiss National Bank in the U.S.
The party also
demanded a ban on the sale of U.S. commercial and government bonds
in Switzerland (a sound proposal, if only because the sale of fraudulent
financial instruments is a crime), an end to the Swiss government's
role as a diplomatic intermediary between Washington and various
national governments disinclined to act as U.S. colonies, and a
refusal by Geneva to help Washington free itself from the tar-baby
it created at Gitmo by taking in detainees freed from the detention
facility.
Not everything
about the SVP is entirely commendable, but in mounting this pressure
campaign it was acting squarely in the noble tradition of William
Tell and Henri Guisan. And the party's efforts may have helped the
Swiss political class regain its backbone and virility: The
Swiss government has announced that it will forbid UBS AG to
comply with any order from the US central government requiring it
to surrender confidential banking information – and that Swiss authorities
would seize that information, if necessary.
Already, major
Swiss banks have announced that, of necessity, they will no longer
accept American clients because of disclosure and paperwork requirements
being pressed on them by Washington's commissars for international
wealth extraction.
These extraordinary
measures, notes Bill Bonner, are being undertaken by Swiss officials
in order to preserve their country's traditional role "as a protector
of foreigners' money." To that end, as well as the protection of
its own citizenry and their economic interests, the Swiss are "sharpening
their knives and tightening their borders," Bonner writes. That
is to say, they seem to be recovering a hint of the intransigent
patriotism that led them to evict the Hapsburgs, throw of Bonaparte's
yoke, and stare down the Wehrmacht.
Washington,
the focus of evil in the modern world, is displaying the behavior
we would expect terminally corrupt collectivist kleptocracy: It
needs revenue to satisfy its retinue of parasitic constituencies,
has the power to seize it in defiance of the law, and believes that
all people everywhere should genuflect before its demands. It is
behaving pretty much the way Gessler did before he was brought down
by Tell's second arrow.
Wouldn't it
be delicious if Switzerland's resistance proved to be the precipitating
event that brought down Washington's wretched empire of debt and
deceit?
Dum spiro,
pugno!
July
11, 2009
William
Norman Grigg [send him mail]
writes the Pro Libertate
blog.
Copyright
© 2009 William Norman Grigg
The
Best of William Norman Grigg
|