New
Year’s Resolutions and Time Preference
by
Anthony Gregory
by Anthony Gregory
DIGG THIS
Most New Year’s
resolutions share a common theme. Time preference, the principle
that people, to varying degrees, tend to prefer satisfaction now
over satisfaction later, is at the heart of economic thinking. The
typical resolution for the upcoming year, whether it involves dieting,
exercising more, being a better neighbor or putting more effort
into work, is a promise to oneself to become more patient, to put
some enjoyment on hold, to live more for tomorrow rather than today.
On an individual
basis, being future-oriented usually pays off in the long run, and
can have short-term benefits as well. People feel better about themselves
when they are more confident about their future. Eating poorly and
spending a lot of money on instant gratification might feel good
at the time, but it does not take long before one’s body and mind
respond with discomfort, guilt and regret. Perhaps humanity is special
because of the human capacity to feel regret so quickly, thus shortening
the horizon between actions and consequences. Maybe humans are special
because they can feel good or bad about decisions rather quickly,
thus allowing concern even for the short term to help guide us in
the long term.
Civilization
flourishes on a low time preference. The more people save, the more
there is available to invest in the future, the brighter the future
and more rapid economic and social growth. A very high time preference
is the mark of childishness, frivolous behavior, and, in extreme
cases, even criminality. The modern state thrives on and encourages
a higher time preference, and thus the process of decivilization
for society as a whole.
The welfare
state favors spending over saving, while making socially conscious
do-gooders feel like they are actually forward-looking. The paternalistic
police state feeds off the desire to feel secure in one’s society
while discarding liberties that took centuries to obtain and will
take long to reclaim. War and empire, while always sold as a way
to defend the future, actually signify radical shortsightedness,
for the consequences over the long haul are rarely thought through
seriously. Deficit spending obviously falls into the same category.
The prototypical high-time preference state project is inflation,
which induces high rates of personal and social spending in the
hopes that another boom now will actually pay off in the end.
In the free
market, time preference regulates spending, saving, borrowing and
investing. A society that favors lavish present consumption cannot
do so forever, for there will be insufficient funds to invest and
develop for future consumption. The inflationary state brings on
the worst, however, as it distorts this crucial balance. Easy credit
and easy money fool entrepreneurs into large, irrational investments,
as though there were future customers saving up to buy from them
years down the road. So factories are built, deals are made, real
estate is developed, and employees are hired with high wages. But
the saving is not happening. The artificially increased money supply
encourages both large investments and lots of spending. This creates
the unnatural boom. The bust must come eventually, and the longer
it is delayed the worse. The worst cases of monetary expansion entail
hyperinflation, the greatest of all economic programs of decivilization.
When the dollar’s value falls gradually, saving is still rational
and a responsible people can offset the ill effects, but when its
value plummets by the day it is hard for anyone to rationalize saving
instead of spending all they can while it’s still worth anything.
To respond
to the more commonplace boom and bust, the government and its kept
propagandists always advocate more personal and governmental spending,
for they want another bubble to delay the inevitable. But this is
a grave error. Ignore their advice. Saving is generally the best
course for one's finances and personal life as well as for future
generations and the greater good. Now is the time for a low-preference
New Year's resolution and even more saving than usual.
So instead
of a specific goal for 2009 – hitting the gym, eating less fat and
fewer carbs, cutting down on vice or saving more – I have an all-encompassing
personal aspiration that sums up the spirit of most New Year’s Resolutions:
To lower my time preference. This is what I resolve to do for myself,
those around me, and for humanity.
And again,
this will pay off faster than it sounds. Exercise rewards the body
and mind week by week. Cutting back on processed trash and focusing
on one’s diet can bring rewards within minutes of eating. And working
harder and saving more with an eye toward the future feels good
right now.
There are ways
to expedite the rewards of a low time preference. Since spending
cash can be quite fun, I can divert money I plan to spend on uses
that will last for months and years. Springing for nice clothes
need not be a high-time preference activity. Eating less garbage
and putting the money and time into good, healthy meals often make
food more enjoyable on a daily basis. BK Marcus pointed out to me
that buying a little silver every now and again is a great thing,
since the purchase is both an investment for the future and a joy
in the present.
Being a good
neighbor and member of one’s family and community requires a concern
for the future but the pleasures of being charitable and friendly
are instantaneous. We as a species, ironically enough, are rewarded
now for thinking about tomorrow. This is something to embrace.
On the other
hand, an overly ambitious New Year’s resolution runs the risk of
being a cheap and easy way to feel good in the midst of frivolous
celebration. A broken resolution can turn out to be a high-time
preference endeavor. And of course, the New Year is a tough time
to radically ratchet down one’s time preference, for we have just
enjoyed the fruits of the holiday season.
I for one had
a great Christmas vacation with my folks in Las Vegas. The family
didn’t waste money in the casino, however, and instead focused on
excellent food and wonderful shows – high in price, but a good value
in that such entertainment is subsidized by the slot players who
spend their whole week emptying their bank accounts to watch wheels
with cherries and sevens spin round and round. The shows and food
also mean precious memories for many years to come. Most important,
it was a terrific, enriching time with mom and dad.
The trip also
taught me something priceless: Another perk of lowering one’s time
preference for young people like me – I’m proud to say I was carded
almost every day on the floor – is that when you’re older, you’ll
have some money for such vacations once in a while, and they won’t
feel at all like a waste. I hope to have the occasional trip like
that in my old age, and above all to have family with whom to spend
it. This hopeful goal is something I can enjoy daily while working
toward, and the lower my time preference now, the more likely it
will happen.
Of course,
life is to be lived and moments are to be cherished. I’ve known
people who got hurt putting too much stock into a future that didn’t
arrive and they then regretted the opportunity costs that come from
missing years of life as they whizzed by. But this too is the mark
of a distorted time preference. It’s good to live in a way that
you can both feel good about the future but also where you don’t
squander your time never enjoying yourself. Seize the day on occasion.
Reasonable present consumption is important too. Do be willing to
part with money, especially for goods that will last and experiences
you’ll always fondly remember. Don’t forget to enjoy life. Time
is a commodity even more precious than money, and it can’t be won
back. Either way there is a little bit of a gamble, but you can
often hedge your bets, living for the day, saving for the ages,
and feeling good about the journey.
But most people
can afford to cut back a little bit and still enjoy the present.
My suggestion to those who still do not have a resolution in mind,
and who might think any one goal, to be meaningful, seems all too
daunting: Just vow to lower your time preference generally, as much
as is reasonable for your situation. Under normal circumstances,
such a promise to oneself will pay off day by day, reveal itself
as a tangible accomplishment within a year, and help secure the
future for the rest of one’s lifetime. Under the world’s current
circumstances, such a resolution, adopted by enough people, might
be just what is needed to save our civilization.
December
31, 2008
Anthony
Gregory [send him mail]
is a writer and musician who lives in Berkeley, California. He is
a research analyst at the Independent
Institute. See
his webpage for more
articles and personal information.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Anthony
Gregory Archives
|