The
Evil War on Drugs
by
Anthony Gregory
by Anthony Gregory
Speak out too
loudly against the drug war, and you might be targeted. Peter
McWilliams had AIDS and cancer and was dependent on marijuana
to stay alive. It turns out that the people who had been using the
stuff medicinally for thousands of years were onto something. No
one has ever been recorded as dying from the physiological effects
of marijuana. But the federal government wouldn’t let McWilliams,
a vocal anti-prohibition activist, have his medicine. They threatened
to take his mother’s house away if he used the substance that was
keeping him alive. He was found dead in his home in June 2000. The
drug war killed him directly.
And now Steve
Kubby is in jail, being deprived of the medical marijuana that
has kept him alive. About a quarter-century ago, he was diagnosed
with an exceedingly rare strain of adrenal cancer that no one else
has been able to survive for more than five years. He was expected
to die within the same timeframe. His physician, Dr. Vincent DeQuattro,
an expert on this rare condition, has credited marijuana with saving
his life. Several years ago, Kubby was forcefully deprived of his
medicine for three days in jail, during which he suffered extreme
vomiting and shivering and went temporarily blind in one eye. In
U.S. custody again, after having taken refuge in Canada and being
extradited back to the Land of the Free, he now has a good chance
of dying, of being murdered by the state, all so it can make an
example of this courageous anti-drug war activist.
For Kubby,
as was the case for McWilliams, prohibition of life-saving medicine
could prove a cruel and unusual execution, all for the non-crime
of self-medication, the right to which all humans are born with.
Apparently, he has been allowed to use some Marinol, but the synthetic
THC simply isn’t a replacement for the complex mixture of cannabinoids
in marijuana. Smoking about twelve grams of pot a day has worked
for him, allowing him to live a healthy life; the government’s approved
version does not quite do the trick, though it might barely be keeping
death away. It is very uncertain at this point what will come of
his health and legal situation.
The drug war
is misdirected. It is foolish. It is stupid, unworkable, disastrous,
tragic and sad. But beyond all that it is evil.
The drug war
is grounded in an evil premise: that people do not own their bodies,
that they have no right to control what they do with their own lives
and their own property, that it is appropriate to lock them in cages
if they produce, distribute or consume chemicals in defiance of
the state.
This is a monstrosity.
As long as America has the drug war, it is not a free country. Politicians
who support it and expand it, knowing the evils it entails, have
no business lecturing us on morality.
The ideology
of the war on drugs is the ideology of totalitarianism, of communism,
of fascism and of slavery. In practice, it has made an utter mockery
of the rule of law and the often-spouted idea that America is the
freest country on earth. The United States has one of the highest
per capita prison populations in the world, second only to Rwanda,
thanks largely to the drug war, all while its federal government
imposes its drug policies on other countries by methods ranging
from mere diplomatic bullying to spraying foreign crops with lethal
poison, from bribing foreign heads of state to bankrolling and whitewashing
acts of mass murder conducted by despots in the name of fighting
drugs.
Like so many
other wars, the drug war is constructed on a mountain of lies. Politicians
have lied over and over about the dangers of specific drugs, the
percentages of drug offenders in prison, the success of various
anti-drug programs, and the motives they have for waging the war.
But even if it weren’t for these acts of brazen dishonesty, the
drug war would still be evil.
The war on
drugs is murderous. Militarized police forces frequently raid homes
and assault or even slaughter innocent people – some of whom did
not even break the unjust drug laws. And those laws are just that
– unjust. Remember it always. The war on drugs is an unjust war
of aggression. Its agents are in the wrong. Under the current system,
if you defend yourself against this homegrown war of aggression,
you might be killed instantly or put
on death row like Cory Maye. The authorities will get away with
it.
The war on
drugs is not a program that should be reconsidered, reformed, or
reinvented. It needs not a different set of priorities or a restructuring.
It needs to be repealed completely. Its prisoners need to be released
without an instant of hesitation. Its greatest victims should be
compensated as much as possible out of the pockets of the aggressors.
Those at the top of this war must be held responsible for their
illegal and immoral acts.
I am sometimes
told that libertarians are too obsessed with the war on drugs. I
disagree. I think that people in general, including many libertarians,
should be more concerned with it. We are talking about the longest
war in American history, one that has hundreds of thousands of innocent
people locked in cages, many of whom are raped and beaten by convicted
brutes as the prison guards laugh, all at an exorbitant cost in
tax dollars and liberty. We are talking about a program that has
decimated every
article in the Bill of Rights. We are talking about a modern-day
witch-trial and inquisition, all wrapped up into one, and multiplied
in its evil effects and destructiveness many times over. We are
talking about the precedent for so many other evil policies, from
prohibitions on so-called "money laundering" and the criminal
enterprise known as civil asset forfeiture to the egregious civil
liberties violations conducted today under the guise of combating
terrorism.
They often
say that all they want in the war on terror are the tools they’ve
been using in the drug war for years. There is some truth to this.
But they should have never had such sweeping powers to begin with,
not for investigating crime, not for fighting terrorism, and especially
not for a war on victimless activity.
The practical
complaints against the drug war have been repeated ad nauseam: Black
market violence escalates, more people die of drug impurities, and
so on. These are compelling enough to end the whole crusade. But
the most fundamental reason to end it is it’s evil, very evil. It
treats sick people like criminals. It wrecks millions of lives.
It puts young people in jail, sometimes for a lifetime, only for
engaging in activities that some of our presidents engaged in when
they themselves were young. It criminalizes speech between doctors
and patients, and producers and consumers. It starts wars in other
countries. It’s one of the greatest social evils in America. Unfortunately,
a distinct political class profits immensely off the oppressive
program, and has succeeded in bamboozling the public into thinking
the program is a necessary evil or even a positive good.
Several years
ago, drug warriors mistook some missionaries flying to Peru for
a plane of drug dealers, and so shot them down. Lew
Rockwell asked, "Isn’t it time the Christian Right begin
to rethink the drug war, which has now taken two of their own?"
Sadly, most
of the Christian Right, as well as most of the rest of the right
and all too much of the left, still believes in the evil drug war.
They are afraid of what will happen if drugs are made legal. Will
more people do drugs?
Maybe. I don’t
personally think the long-term increase would be so dramatic, if
there were one at all. At various times, heroin, cocaine, marijuana,
LSD, ecstasy, and amphetamine were legal. The problems associated
with legal drugs many years ago still exist today, but at least
we didn’t also have a deeply immoral war on drugs tearing society
apart.
Even if some
problems did increase, the drug war simply cannot be justified.
It is rotten and immoral to the core. To put someone in a cage,
or to kill someone, for engaging in private behavior or mutually
voluntary trade is purely evil. That is the first and most important
argument against the war on drugs.
February
1, 2006
Anthony
Gregory [send him mail]
is a writer and musician who lives in Berkeley, California. He is
a research analyst at the Independent
Institute. See
his webpage for more
articles and personal information.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Anthony
Gregory Archives
|