PC
Media Culture Ignores Immigration Debate
by
Steven Greenhut
by Steven Greenhut
As
I read and watched the news coverage about Southern California’s
poor grades in a recently released "report card" of the
region’s economy and quality of life, I thought about Lew Rockwell’s
recent column, "And
the Word Was Made Web." Here was a stellar example of what
Rockwell was writing about.
The
report card issued by the Southern California Association of Governments
– as its name implies, this is the official association of local
governments charged with developing region-wide government plans
– gave the six-county region (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, Ventura and Imperial) Ds in traffic, education and housing,
Cs in income and air quality, and Bs in jobs and crime. SCAG – don’t
you love the acronym? – painted a bleak picture of a region losing
ground in the key "quality of life" areas. Only the weather
and the glorious terrain seem to survive the region’s apparent downward
spiral.
News
reports did one of two things.
The
first approach: They trumpeted the bleak news, providing pictures
of smog-covered cities, congested freeways, and overcrowded and
crumbling schools. The information was quite interesting, especially
news that the average payroll per job in the SCAG region fell to
the lowest among all metropolitan areas, even below the bleak metropolises
of Detroit and Philadelphia. (In some ways it’s hard to believe,
given the ostentatious wealth on display all around us, but the
report was based on reasonable and consistent standards. Despite
SCAG being an arm of government, it is well respected at pinpointing
problems, even if its solutions invariably are wrong.)
The
second approach: News reports downplayed the findings, arguing that
everything here is pretty good, despite the news. The Los Angeles
Times article on Feb. 6, the day after the study was released,
was titled: "Good Vibes Overcome Bad News." It interviewed
local officials who said how great Southern California really is,
and none of these problems are beyond what government can fix. One
mayor called for building a high-speed train system to fix the transportation
mess and reduce air pollution and create jobs. That is a bogus solution
to problems caused by government, but this response was typical.
Now,
I, too, had mixed feelings about the report. California, despite
everything, is a lovely place to live. It is not nearly as bad as
the report implied. But I do know that the problems discussed are
real, although I also know that SCAG has a vested interest in making
the problems seem as horrendous as possible so that its member agencies
can whine for more tax dollars.
Nevertheless,
I was shocked by the lack of coverage of one particular aspect of
the SCAG report buried in the findings. In fact, it wasn’t even
really buried. On the first page of SCAG’s executive summary is
this news: "Economic and demographic driving forces were the
primary reasons for ‘losing ground’ in our region. Specifically,
during the early 1990s, the region went through the most severe
recession since the Great Depression, losing half a million jobs
and suffering an 8 percent decline in its real personal income per
capita between 1990 and 1993. Many of the jobs lost were in the
high-wage defense aerospace manufacturing. As a result, Southern
California experienced a 1.5-million net domestic out-migration
during the last decade, the largest in our region’s history. During
the same period, the region added 1.5 million foreign immigrants."
Now
here’s the key point: "When compared with the domestic out-migrants
and the general population, recent immigrants are, on average, less
educated, earn lower incomes, live in larger households and rely
significantly on rental housing."
The
story of declining wages, more congested transportation systems,
overcrowded schools, insufficient housing stock, dropping income
and worsening air quality is at least in part a story about the
effects of escalating Third World immigration. Pay careful attention,
I wrote "in part." It’s probably a large part. But I am
not – I have to say this loud and clear for those readers who are
dense – blaming all of Southern California’s or America’s problems
on immigrants.
But
what explains the general failure to even mention immigration in
the context of the SCAG report card? I didn’t read every news report
on the matter in every California newspaper, but none of the articles
I saw even mentioned immigration in passing. If the second paragraph
in the executive summary blamed insufficient government spending
for the problems, or blamed tax-limiting Prop. 13, you could bet
your life that would have made it into virtually every lead sentence
and headline in every newspaper in California.
Realistically,
the problems of immigration are generally taboo in the mainstream
media. On the Internet, by contrast, these issues can be debated
freely. In his article, Rockwell was writing about the chasm between
the information provided in the mainstream media and the more forthright
ideas presented on the Internet. In the past, we had to rely on
the newspapers and TV news programs, and at best glean some truth
between the lines in the politically correct reports. These days
we turn to the Internet to learn what the media mavens won’t tell
us.
As
he wrote, not everything on the Internet is wise or good. But there
is a far different standard of forthrightness that rules on the
Web. No one could have gotten away with ignoring the immigration
issue in Web-based discussions about the SCAG report or Southern
California’s quality of life. Unfortunately, most of the great policy
stuff on the Web is nationally oriented, so I didn’t see any great
Web-based reports on SCAG, either. But it won’t be long before local
coverage changes also.
There’s
a second story from the SCAG report that is not discussed much in
the California media, at least outside my newspaper’s editorial
page. Most of the bad grades are grades that belong to government
agencies. A D in traffic is not the fault of commuters. It
is the fault of the transportation agencies that spend most of their
money on light-rail lines and HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes
rather than roads and freeways. In Orange County, the agency is
run by transit rather than transportation officials. They are convinced
that light rail is the future of this suburban region. That is the
main focus of everything the agency does. The roads worsen because
the officials waste our tax dollars on boutique rail systems.
California
has dramatically increased the amount of per-pupil spending in the
past few years and the results only get worse. Housing prices are
soaring because governments increasingly implement slow-growth policies
that make it nearly impossible to build adequate supply to meet
demand. Air quality stinks despite bazillions of dollars thrown
at government air-quality programs. Jobs and income are falling
in part because of the high taxes and regulations imposed by a state
government with a quasi-Marxist view of life.
And
then there’s the fact about immigration. The low-income people who
come here use an excess of government "services." Roads
become more clogged even in denser urban areas as families double
up and triple up in single-family homes. In many areas in Southern
California, the children of illegal immigrants make up one-third
to one-half of the school population. The lack of English-language
skills accounts for dropping test scores. The influx of cheap labor
explains, in part, dropping wages. The rapid increase in population
has led to overcrowded apartments and such high demand for them
that rents keep going up.
This
is a real issue, regardless of one’s views of immigration. But when
the mainstream media ignores that and other issues, people will
turn to places where crucial issues are not ignored. That’s why
the future is bright for the Internet.
February
14, 2004
Steven
Greenhut (send him mail)
is a senior editorial writer and columnist for the Orange County
Register.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Steven
Greenhut Archives
|