Woods
Tells the Story of the Meltdown
by
David Gordon
by David Gordon
Recently
by David Gordon: Killing
in War
Meltdown:
A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy
Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse. By
Thomas E. Woods Jr. Regnery 2009. Xi + 194 pages.
Tom Woods has
made an invaluable contribution with his latest book. The public
today looks for an explanation of the current economic crisis and
a prescription for recovery. Conflicting accounts abound. Should
the collapse of the housing bubble and the accompanying credit crunch
be met by increased government spending, as Keynesians aver? Does
the key to the mystery lie in maintaining an adequate supply of
money, as monetarists think? Those of us inclined to the Austrian
School know better: such foolish resorts to the government serve
only to worsen matters.
Austrian business-cycle
theory is straightforward, for those willing to devote the necessary
time to study praxeology. But therein lies a problem. The average
person lacks the patience to read Human
Action and Man,
Economy, and State. How then can he acquire the rudiments
of Austrian cycle theory and grasp why the theory is true? To set
the question aside, on the grounds that it is unnecessary for the
man in the street to bother with such matters, is a counsel of despair.
If the public does not understand the economics of depression, there
is little hope that we can avoid disastrous government policies.
Unless the free market receives sufficient popular support, our
economic future is bleak.
Woods supplies
just what we need. With great clarity, he shows that the Austrian
theory of the cycle is firmly grounded in common sense. Additionally
and here his skill as a trained historian comes to the fore
he shows that Austrian theory explains not only the Great
Depression but other less-well-known economic downturns as well.
When the government followed a "hands-off" policy, recovery
from a downturn was rapid; when, as most notably was the case in
the New Deal, government tried to take control, the economy sputtered.
The basics
of Austrian cycle theory fall readily into place once one considers
a fundamental point: the economy can grow only by producing more
goods. An expansion of the money supply does not suffice. Efforts
to get something for nothing, by the government's deficit spending
or by an expansion of the money supply, cannot produce lasting prosperity.
The speed with
which an economy grows depends on the extent to which people prefer
present goods to future goods. Other things being equal, people
always prefer satisfaction in the present; but the extent to which
this preference prevails is crucial for economic development. In
order to obtain more consumer goods than are immediately available,
people must postpone satisfaction by saving, enabling a greater
production of capital goods to occur.
Look at
it from the saver's perspective. Saving more indicates a relatively
lower desire to consume in the present. This is another incentive
for businesses to invest in the future, to carry out time-consuming
investment projects with an eye to future production, rather
than produce and sell things now. (p. 67)
The extent
that they are willing to do so determines the rate of economic growth.
The preference
people have for the present forms the main part of the rate of interest:
Mises called this the originary rate of interest. This rate registers
the way people allocate resources between consumption and production.
Trouble arises
when the government, by increasing the supply of bank credit, depresses
the money rate of interest below the natural rate. Businessmen,
seeing that money is available, invest in capital-goods industries,
and the result is a boom.
Read
the rest of the article

The
Best of David Gordon
|