A
Nation of Sheep
by
David Gordon
by David Gordon
DIGG THIS
A
Nation of Sheep.
By Andrew P. Napolitano. Thomas Nelson, 2007. Xiii + 240 pages.
Judge Napolitano
has organized his excellent book around a central metaphor. He
contrasts sheep, who follow their shepherd with unquestioning
devotion, and wolves, who are alert to protect themselves:
There
are two kinds of people who stand out in the United States today:
sheep and wolves. Sheep stay in their herd and follow their shepherd
without questioning where he is leading them. Sheep trust that
the shepherd looks out for their safety
Wolves, on the other
hand, do not aimlessly follow a shepherd
Wolves question
the shepherd and act in a way that forces the shepherd also to
question his decisions. Wolves challenge government regulations,
reject government assistance, and demand that the government recognize
and protect their natural rights. They are rugged individualists
(p. 10).
America,
Napolitano thinks, consists largely of sheep: we acquiesce in
gross violations of our civil liberties, including but by no means
confined to, those inflicted on us by the Bush administration,
in the course of its "War on Terror." Too often, even
those concerned about the current violations of civil liberties
will think in this way.
True enough,
the Patriot Act gives the government the power to pry into our
correspondence, telephone calls, and personal records; and if
I were unfortunate enough to be suspected of being an "enemy
combatant," I might suffer a dire fate indeed. Why, though,
should I care about that? The Administration is concerned only
with blocking terrorists. There is only the remotest chance any
of these civil liberties violations will have any direct effect
on me.
Napolitano
makes clear that this is an unduly narrow way to view matters,
and not only because of the familiar argument that a government
that targets one group may later target others as well. ("First
they came for the
, etc.") Quite, the contrary, violations
of rights affect the ordinary person as well.
As a prime
example, commuters who enter the New York subway must submit to
random searches of their bags.
The
New York Police Department, along with many other police departments
across the country, now conducts random bag searches in the subway,
without suspicion or warrant, in order to prevent terrorist attacks.
These random searches clearly violate the Fourth Amendment, which
is meant to protect all persons from warrantless searches and
seizures. If you are unlucky enough to be selected "randomly,"
the officers will stop you as you hurry to catch your morning
train. As the doors slide closed on the platform below and your
train departs, you stand helplessly as the bored cops search your
bag. (p. 14)
Copyright ©
2008 Ludwig von Mises Institute
David
Gordon Archives
|