Liberal Fascism?
by
David Gordon
by David Gordon
DIGG THIS
Liberal
Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini
to the Politics of Meaning. By Jonah Goldberg. Doubleday,
2007. 487 pages.
Jonah Goldberg
has ruined what could have been a valuable book. Goldberg has in
the past treated libertarians with disdain, but here he offers an
analysis of fascism that libertarians will find familiar. Goldberg
has been influenced by John T. Flynn's comparison of Franklin Roosevelt's
New Deal with Italian fascism; and he cites Friedrich Hayek with
respect. He has learned from Murray Rothbard on the progressives
as well. (He at one point remarks, "if libertarianism could
account for children and foreign policy, it would be the ideal political
philosophy" [p. 344].)
Fascism is
usually counted a movement of the Right; but, as Goldberg notes,
many leftists viewed Mussolini with sympathy. (Here Goldberg follows
the important work of John Patrick Diggins, Mussolini
and Fascism: The View from America.) H.G. Wells in a speech
at Oxford in 1932 called for a "Liberal Fascism"; and
Rexford Tugwell, a leading member of Roosevelt's Brain Trust, said
in 1934, "I find Italy doing many of the things which seem
to me necessary
. Mussolini certainly has the same people opposed
to him as FDR has. But he has the press controlled so that they
cannot scream lies at him daily" (p. 156).
How
is this possible? Leftists wish to reconstruct society along socialistic
lines; fascists glorify the nation and militarism. How can leftists
favor fascism? Goldberg readily resolves the difficulty. Precisely
by importing the war spirit into domestic affairs, leftists hope
to reconstruct society. In war, people unite to achieve victory;
in doing so, they sacrifice their personal ends to achieve the common
goal. The fascists took exactly the same view, and many leftists
accordingly recognized the affinity.
The progressives
were well aware that war would enable them to advance their ambitious
social plans, and they advocated American entry into the First World
War for this reason. Herbert Croly, author of the vastly influential
The Promise of American Life, "looked forward to
many more wars because war was the midwife of progress
Croly's
New Republic was relentless in its push for war" (pp.
99, 107).
Read
the rest of the article
Copyright ©
2008 Ludwig von Mises Institute
David
Gordon Archives
|