Blood and Irony: No-Flying the Unfriendly Skies of Iraq
by Chris Floyd
by Chris Floyd
DIGG THIS
"Irony
is dead" was a phrase you used to hear a lot in the days right
after 9/11. It wasn't true, of course; genuine irony is more necessary
and more inescapable than ever during a time of tragedy,
when reality forces itself more strongly to the surface, exposing
all of its fissures and inconsistencies. What the phrase actually
meant was "sneering sarcasm is dead." (Which wasn't true
either, although for a time such sarcasm could only be applied safely,
in print, to anyone who dissented slightly from the Leader-worship
that saturated the media. Christopher "I'm with Dave Horowitz"
Hitchens' famous "It
no longer matters what they think" piece comes to mind
here.)
No,
irony bitter, wrenching, wounding irony is ever-present
in tragedy. A stark reminder of this cropped up last week in a
little-noticed story in USA Today about the efforts of
the U.S. military in Iraq to stop the rash of helicopter downings
by the insurgents. It's a straight-forward piece of embedded reporting,
simply relating the statements of some American military officers
about a change in tactics. Interesting, factual, nothing controversial
about it at all.
The bitter
irony comes in the phrase that the Pentagon has adopted for the
aerial corridors they've laid out to escape insurgent attacks on
the helicopters: "No-Fly Zones."
Although the
period before George W. Bush began the
mass murder of more than 600,000 innocent people in Iraq now
seems so far away a page from ancient history, like the defeat
of the "world's only superpower" by a small band of ruthless,
fanatical insurgents now being celebrated in the hit film "300"
just a few years ago the phrase "No-Fly Zone" stood
as a symbol of all-conquering American power. After George Herbert
Walker Bush instigated then betrayed the post-Gulf War rebellions
of the Iraqi Kurds and Shiites, the U.S. and little tail-waggy Britain
set up the "No-Fly Zones" to deny Saddam Hussein access
to some two-thirds of Iraqi airspace. (With one exception, of course:
George H.W. Bush did allow Saddam to use his helicopter gunships
to kill the rebellious Shiites during the post-war uprising.) For
12 years, the Anglo-American air forces controlled Iraq's skies,
bombing targets in (and out of) the zones with impunity.
In those heady
days the same period when the CIA was sponsoring terrorist
attacks against civilians in Iraq, carried
out by former Baathist tough guy Iyad Allawi, later shoehorned
into office as a post-Saddam prime minister, and reportedly being
groomed for another shot at the saddle if Bush and the boys decide
to do a Diem on Nouri al-Maliki "No-Fly Zone" was
one of those tough-guy jargon phrases beloved of TV talkers, along
the lines of "Shock and Awe" or "pre-dawn vertical
insertion," the strangely kinky Reaganite tag for the invasion
of Grenada. It stood for the unstoppable imposition of American
military might anytime, anywhere, any which way but loose.
But now the
phrase is the sad and bloodsoaked emblem of a wretched defeat, a
pointless and unnecessary gutting of American power. It now denotes
those areas where American aircraft are forbidden to fly, lest they
be shot down by Iraqis the precise opposite of the No-Fly Zones
of yore.
A full four
years into the war, and just shy of that mark since "Mission
Accomplished" was proclaimed, the occupying power has been
forced to deny its own pilots access to larger and larger swathes
of Iraqi airspace even as the use of helicopters for troop transport
and supply is growing, due to the increasingly unsafe conditions
on the ground. It is the Iraqis who are now imposing "No-Fly
Zones" on the "world's only superpower."
This reversal
of fortune is bitter irony indeed, as the besieger becomes the besieged,
and the yawning chasm between the American elite's dreams of domination
and their ability to achieve them grows wider and wider. The Bush
Gang's ever-more frantic attempts to bridge this gap throwing
more American cannon fodder into the pit, incarcerating more Iraqis,
doling out more pork to war profiteers, launching one new regime
change war against Somalia while inching closer to another one against
Iran will only bring more needless ruin, bloodshed and terror.
Irony is not
dead; but people are. And more will die today, still more tomorrow,
and more in the days and weeks and months of senseless war to come.
March
29, 2007
Chris
Floyd [send him mail]
is the author of Empire
Burlesque: The Secret History of the Bush Regime.
Copyright
© 2007 Chris Floyd
Chris
Floyd Archives
|