The Jackal's Feast Goes On
by Chris Floyd
by Chris Floyd
DIGG THIS
The picture
below (from the New York Times) speaks most eloquently on
the essence of the Bush Regime's brutal, grubby Babylonian Conquest:
fat mercenaries guarding the construction of yet another prison.

The picture
comes from a
story on the "overhead costs" of reconstruction projects,
based on a report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction,
who found astonishing amounts of waste and cost overruns by the
crony contractors who came to feast on the carcass that Bush killed
for them. Two main points emerge from the report.
First, that
the IG's catalogue of gouging, feather-bedding and other profitable
forms of war-profiteering is by no means complete, because "the
United States has not properly tracked how much such expenses have
taken from the $18.4 billion of taxpayer-financed reconstruction
approved by Congress two years ago." In fact, the IG's office
was only able to examine only $1.3 billion of the contracts.
In other words,
as oft reported here
(and here and here),
much of that money has simply disappeared into corporate
coffers, into copious baksheesh for the Bush-backed Iraqi government,
into kickbacks for Congressional vultures, and doubtless into slush
funds both for covert ops (including perhaps the Bushists' deliberate
fomenting
of terrorism and arming
of militias) and domestic politics. We are most likely seeing
the fruits of some of this blood money wash up on American screens
at this very moment, as the GOP's last-ditch "Smear and Fear"
campaign goes into hyperdrive.
The second
salient point is the fact that most of this "overhead"
is not going toward security costs. Apologists for the Dear Leader's
war crime have been quick to answer any criticism of the woeful
dearth of "reconstruction" and the fact that the
Iraqi people now have lower levels of electricity, fuel, health
care, sanitation, etc. than before the invasion by blaming
the colossal waste and fraud on the insurgents. But the Inspector
General appointed by the Bush Administration itself
tells us that the war-crime apologists are dead wrong:
The report
said the prime reason was not the need to provide security, though
those costs have clearly risen in the perilous environment, and
are a burden that both contractors and American officials routinely
blame for such increases. Instead, the inspector general pointed
to a simple bureaucratic flaw: the United States ordered the contractors
and their equipment to Iraq and then let them sit idle for months
at a time. The delay between mobilization, or assembling
the teams in Iraq, and the start of actual construction was as
long as nine months.
The
government blew the whistle for these guys to go to Iraq and the
meter ran, said Jim Mitchell, a spokesman for the inspector
generals office. The government was billed for sometimes
nine months before work began.
The findings
are similar to those of a growing list of inspections, audits
and investigations that have concluded that the program to rebuild
Iraq has often fallen short for the most mundane of reasons: poorly
written contracts, ineffective or nonexistent oversight, needless
project delays and egregiously poor construction practices.
This
report is the latest chapter in a long, sad and expensive tale
about how contracting in Iraq was more about shoveling money out
the door than actually getting real results on the ground,
said Stephen Ellis, a vice president at Taxpayers for Common Sense
in Washington. These contracts were to design and build
important items for oil infrastructure, hospitals and education,
but in some cases more than half of the money padded corporate
coffers instead, he said.
None of this
is surprising. War profiteering by favored corporate cronies was
one of the primary benefits envisaged by the Bush Regime as it drove
so relentlessly and deceitfully toward the baseless and unprovoked
attack. This "waste" and "overhead" was and
is a key part of the whole operation. Certainly, the betterment
of Iraqi lives was far down the list of priorities for the "reconstruction"
program. As
we noted here last week, the whole war has been a cash cow that
will swell the personal fortunes and fuel the partisan agenda of
the Bush Faction players, even if they are turfed out of office
in 2008. Thus it was inevitable that the $18 billion boondoggle
would produce results like this:
The report
provided the first official estimate that, in some cases, more
money was being spent on housing and feeding employees, completing
paperwork and providing security than on actual construction.
Those overhead costs have ranged from under 20 percent to as much
as 55 percent of the budgets, according to the report.... On similar
projects in the United States, those costs generally run to a
few percent.
The highest
proportion of overhead was incurred in oil-facility contracts
won by KBR Inc., the Halliburton subsidiary formerly known as
Kellogg Brown & Root, which has frequently been challenged
by critics in Congress and elsewhere.
The latter
finding on KBR is "news" on the order of "sun rises
in the east" or "pigs eat swill." In fact, Halliburton's
unconscionable gulping of blood money and the fact that
Dick Cheney still receives huge annual sums from the company
are so well-established now that they pass almost unnoticed. "Halliburton,
Cheney, yeah, everybody knows that. Even Leno's stopped telling
jokes about it." This stark corruption an unprecedented
scandal in American history: a sitting vice-president openly taking
cash from a war industry during a war of which he himself is a prime
instigator has almost lost its power to shock.
(Of course,
KBR
played a very similar role during the Vietnam War, when huge
wads of its massive war profits were certainly kicked back to serving
politicians like Lyndon Johnson and others in the then-Democratic
majority, as well as to key Republicans. But in those days, bought
pols had the decency to trouser their bribes on the QT, not serve
openly on the payroll. Here, as in so many things, the Bush Regime
is openly embracing and often codifying in law dark
practices once thought shameful to acknowledge. I suppose we must
at least admire their refreshing candor in being so forthrightly
corrupt, bloodthirsty and belligerent.)
The IG's report
is devastating: but again, all this waste was built into the system
from the start. Halliburton and the other swill-swallowers were
given "cost-plus" contracts (many of them simply handed
out like Halloween candy, without any of that silly-billy nonsense
about competitive bidding). This means that they are guaranteed
a certain set profit, no matter how far their costs balloon. There
is simply no incentive for them to even try to bring a project in
at cost or indeed, to even complete it at all. There's just
too much money to be made by running up the meter, throwing away
material and buying it again, cutting lucrative side deals with
suppliers (and re-suppliers), mercenaries, local officials, etc.
This ethos
of waste, corruption and utter disregard for the money of the American
people and the lives and well-being of the Iraqi people
is characteristic of the entire malevolent enterprise. A war of
aggression launched without any justification whatsoever beyond
the greed and power-lust of a band of corrupt authoritarian militarists
led by two men who squirmed and weaseled mightily to avoid
combat in their youths but have no compunction whatsoever about
sending other people off to kill and die was bound to produce
the
moral horror that we see in Iraq today. And make no mistake
despite all the White House PR about "timetables"
and strategy shifts, despite the rising hopes of ousting Bush's
bootlicking rubberstamps from control of the Congress, the stark
truth (which
I noted here in May) remains: There is no good solution to the
hell Bush has wrought in his arrogance and folly. There is only
blood and horror all the way down.
October
26, 2006
Chris
Floyd [send him mail]
is the author of Empire
Burlesque: The Secret History of the Bush Regime.
Copyright
© 2006 Chris Floyd
Chris
Floyd Archives
|