Warehousing
Humans
by Rick Fisk
by Rick Fisk
DIGG THIS
The words
"The United States of America" carries different meanings depending
on who you ask for definitions. One common thread is found
in U.S. institutions. Social Security, the Military, The Supreme
Court, prisons, hospitals, welfare. These institutions define what
it is to be in the United States for better or for worse. Some,
like family, public school and daycare are not necessarily government
institutions, but they tend to define Americans both figuratively
and literally.
One cannot
help but be shaped by institutions if one is associated with those
institutions during formative years.
Public schools
were marketed to the electorate of the several states as a way to
provide a superior education, yet the promise hasn't been met. The
literacy rate has plummeted, private property has essentially been
abolished and what we've really been given is warehouses for our
children. Children do not learn much at government schools but at
least somebody is taking care of them while we go to work to pay
our property taxes, income taxes and sales taxes.
"The production
of monsters – helpless, twisted monsters whose normal development
has been stunted – goes on all around us. But the modern heirs
of the comprachicos are smarter and subtler. They do not hide,
they practice their trade in the open, the results are invisible.
In the past this horrible surgery left traces on a child's face,
not in his mind. Today it leaves traces in his mind, not on his
face. In both cases the child is not aware of the mutilation he
has suffered. Today's comprachicos do not use narcotic powders.
They take a child before he is fully aware of reality and never
let him develop that awareness. Where nature put a normal brain,
they put mental retardation. To make you unconscious for life
by means of your own brain, nothing could be more ingenious. They
are the comprachicos of the mind. They do not place a child into
a vase to adjust his body to its contours. They place him into
a school to adjust him to society."
Ayn
Rand, The
New Left, 1971
Since the 70's
when the two-income family began to be the rule rather than the
exception, a new institution has become part of our lexicon: daycare.
Where we used to whisk away children to kindergarten, we now send
them away as early as 4 months so that mommy can go back to work.
The single-parent household has also increased the demand for this
institution, facilitated by another defining institution
the no-fault, State divorce. Let's not forget the rejection of marriage.
Many children are born to single mothers who have rejected marriage
as a religious or state institution. So they sometimes rely on another
institution: welfare.
Over time,
this warehousing of children has had several downstream effects.
Now we are warehousing our old people. Why not? Like our refuse
which just goes away somewhere to some nondescript and out-of-sight
location, state-run and private "senior care" facilities have enjoyed
a boom and become the refuse heap of the wisest in our societies.
This not only represents our degraded level of respect toward the
elderly, it separates our children from the elderly, thereby increasing
the dehumanizing effects of these human warehouses.
It is a natural
consequence of being warehoused as children.
The bond built
by families that spent most of their waking hours together has been
severed by our reliance on social institutions and programs – daycare,
public schools, social security and elderly care facilities.
The Amish are
one of the few groups that stood against Public Schools and Social
Security; arguing against the latter for the reason that it was
their moral duty to care for their own elderly. Allowing the Federal
Government authority in this matter would be a corruptive influence
and weaken their own social and moral obligations to their own families
and the God they worshiped. The Congress in 1965, when creating
Lyndon Johnson's Medicare, exempted the Amish from paying into Social
Security after a long and embarrassing battle between the IRS and
Valentine
Byler.
The Amish take
care of both young and elderly without the aid of warehousing or
government handouts. By and large, their culture and society has
remained strong while those who have succumbed to the modern conveniences
(connivances) and "benefits" doled out by our new parental guardians
are shuffling off children and old-folks into warehouses and ironically,
generally perplexed by the social decline they witness.
The weakened
family bond created by our social institutions and government handouts
has resulted in weak families. In turn, this has resulted in weak
communities, weak states and a very strong central government which
controls virtually everything we do while promoting the claim that
we are the freest nation on earth.
By now, a large
majority of us have experienced an elderly care facility. With no
real purpose left in life but to play bingo and sign over their
benefit checks to the facility's fiduciaries, the elderly do not
last long once they've been admitted, at least, not in my experience.
My own grandparents lasted about 2 years. Thankfully, my grandparents
were 99 and 88 at the time of their admittance and had already lived
long and fruitful lives. When my grandfather died, he was just shy
of his 101st birthday. But to give you an idea of the breathtaking
quickness of his demise, at 99 he had taken both the written and
the driving test in his state and passed with flying colors. That
might scare you but he was quite a good driver. He surprised me.
Less than a year after he entered the nursing home he could barely
walk, much less drive.
I have heard
the claim time and time again that people really want to go into
nursing homes. The care is good, or so they say, and this eliminates
the burden on families. After all, when both parents have to work
in order to keep paying their income taxes, credit card, mortgages,
car loans, college loans and property taxes, there's no time left
to keep the family together and there's certainly no place for an
elderly relative.
It would be
easy to just write this off as the result of a generally debased
morality. However, there's more to this than meets the eye. Not
only do our government institutions corrupt our morals, there is
a corruption of our currency which not only makes these institutions
possible to finance, but virtually impossible to avoid if you are
part of the middle class or working poor.
It's ironic
then that our belief in these systems has been based upon the premise
that they are part of our collective moral obligation. Nothing could
be further from the truth. These institutions corrupt our morals
and restrict our rights to self-determination and practice of our
religions. The realm of faith has been passed to government. Do
you lack faith that your God will help you? Turn to the one true
God that can: government.
You aren't
instructed that by turning to these institutions, you have to give
up any rights to direct your child's moral development, give up
your rights to own property, know for certain the value of your
money and how long you may practice your profession.
Furthermore,
if you are a U.S. Citizen who relies upon social security payments,
you can rest assured that the inflationary increases in your benefits
will never keep up with the true inflation that is occurring due
to a Federal Reserve and a Congress which won't ever give up its
golden goose: The Federal Reserve.
Retirees now
are leaving
the country in order that their dollars will actually buy them
the goods and services required to provide them shelter, food and
medical care. Contrary to what some say about the wonderful nursing
facilities in this country, the elderly are tending to opt out.
They don't want to be warehoused. We are losing one of our most
valuable resources. Forced to drop out of society, the elderly can
sit around and wait to die, or move somewhere they are appreciated
and valued. Many are going to Mexico and South America rather than
Florida or some nursing home close to their families only to get
a visit once a month.
At one time,
our elderly lived with us, we cared for them and our children and
communities reaped the benefits of their wisdom. Those who were
institutionalized as children have been taught by example that this
is the normal way to handle humans who are hard to deal with. Just
look at our drug laws. We throw non-violent drug offenders into
our prisons more often than we throw violent criminals there. Huge
corporations have grown up to provide management of our institutions.
It's a very big business and if we do not do something to break
the cycle, we may find that there is no space between high school
and the nursing home where we are not warehoused somewhere. Perhaps
we'll all be working for the Post Office or the Ministry of Peace
in Iraq during those years.
Our institutions
have been forced upon us. Nobody from this generation was given
the option of avoiding them or rejecting their validity. The government
and old media keep trying to placate us by claiming that we are
incapable of planning for our futures or educating our children,
but I don't recall anyone ever telling us that the price would be
far more than the phony federal reserve notes withheld from our
paychecks each pay period. The true costs, in both figurative and
literal terms, were never disclosed.
The whole system
is corrupt and immoral and is built to trap all of us. It has been
about seven generations since public schools were instituted. It
only took one generation before the Federal Reserve and the Income
Tax were enacted. Within the second generation of our public school
system, the FDA, FCC, Social Security and a federal gun ban passed.
It is my belief that these never would have become reality were
it not for public schools. Karl Marx was a member of the first generation
of Prussian public school graduates. It should be no surprise then
that the same system in the U.S. would produce similar results.
It's obviously
possible to raise children with strong moral values in spite of
their public schooling. Look at Ron Paul's family for instance.
However, this is the exception rather than the rule. We are told
that public schools preserve our "future." But perhaps the
people pushing this idea envision a future much darker than is implied
by the propaganda.
We need to
envision a future that sees public institutions as the exception
rather than the rule. I see that future in the candidacy of
Ron Paul. Ron Paul has been one of the few to even suggest that
our public institutions, especially the Federal Reserve and the
Income tax restrict our rights and are both philosophically and
morally bankrupt. The rest of the field do not even acknowledge
the corrupt nature of these institutions much less suggest that
they be abolished. In fact, on the Republican side of the isle,
we are told that more government regulation is required to protect
the institution of marriage and family.
Any more protection
of family and marriage might just be the death of both.
November
6, 2007
Rick
Fisk [send him mail] is
a 45-year-old software developer and entrepreneur. He is married,
has 3 children and resides in Austin, TX.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Rick
Fisk Archives
|