Hazing
vs. Torture
by
Marcus Epstein
by Marcus Epstein
After
the pictures and accounts of prison abuse at Abu Ghraib surfaced,
Rush Limbaugh opined
that the incident wasn’t torture or a human rights violation, but
merely "sort of like hazing, a fraternity prank. Sort of like that
kind of fun." Leaving Mr. Limbaugh’s questionable equivocation aside
for the time being, our out-of-control domestic judges are now fulfilling
Rush’s prophecy and charging four fraternity members with torture
for a case of hazing gone bad.
At
Chico State, Matt Carrington, a 21-year-old a pledge in the already
de-chartered Chi Tau fraternity died during "hell week"
after being forced to consume gallons of water and engage in physical
activity. The fraternity brothers were initially charged with hazing
and involuntary manslaughter, but Judge Robert Glusman recently
insisted on adding the charge of torture,
which carries a potential term of life in prison, on the grounds
that, "U.S. soldiers were charged with torturing Iraqi prisoners
for doing far less than what happened in that basement."
The
Chi Tau "Hell Week" does not seem like a pleasant experience
that most people would choose to endure. According
to the San Francisco Chronicle,
pledges were
told they would spend their nights sleeping in concrete bunkerlike
holes, where the windows have no glass, it was so cold they could
see their breath and graffiti on the walls told them they were
less than men if they quit,
One
night the pledges were told to do strenuous physical exercise in
2-3 inches of raw sewage. Another night, they did it in the freezing
cold. The night that Mr. Carrington died, brothers watched a movie
and asked the pledges trivia questions, and told them do push ups
and consume large amounts of water when they answered the questions
incorrectly. Mr. Carrington collapsed while doing push ups and died
two hours later of water intoxication.
Besides
the grueling hazing, there are many reasons why many people would
not want to join the Chi Tau chapter at Chico State. The fraternity
had already lost their charter two years earlier, so they weren’t
even an official Greek organization. Of the four students charged
with torture in the incident, one is 25 and two aren’t even students.
I can’t imagine joining that type of fraternity. In fact, I don’t
know anyone who would pledge a fraternity when they were already
21 years old. Nonetheless, Mr. Carrington was an adult who chose
to do all those acts in his own volition.
What
both Judge Glusman and Mr. Limbaugh fail to recognize is the difference
between what is voluntary and what is coerced. This distinction
may seem minor to judges and talk radio hosts, but it is what distinguishes
murder from suicide, rape from seduction, slavery from employment,
theft from charity, and torture from hazing.
While I am not condoning what happened at the Chi Tau fraternity
house, even if it was voluntary, it seems to be less sadistic than
what happened at the prison. According to the suppressed internal
investigation into the prison, the activities of the prison guards
included,
Breaking
chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees;
pouring cold water on naked detainees; beating detainees with
a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with rape;
allowing a military police guard to stitch the wound of a detainee
who was injured after being slammed against the wall in his cell;
sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom
stick, and using military working dogs to frighten and intimidate
detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance actually
biting a detainee.
More
importantly, those who had these abuses inflicted upon them were
not there by choice. They were picked up off the street and forced
to endure the brutality of the American prison guards. They couldn’t
just walk out and leave the jail, nor did they consent to the mistreatment
so they could join a club with the soldiers. It should also be noted
that not all of the victims at Abu Ghraib committed "crimes
against the coalition." Many were common criminals, and even
suspected insurgents who were later exonerated.
In
contrast, Mr. Carrington voluntarily consented to the abuse. According
to the San Francisco Chronicle, "Carrington would have
never been allowed to join Chi Tau had he tried to walk away from
the abuse he endured," and that "Of five pledges who had
hoped to join the fraternity, only Carrington and Quintana made
it through ‘Hell Week’ and into the basement." In other words,
he was free to leave and not join the fraternity anytime he wanted.
Three of his fellow pledges did exactly that, and decided that being
a member of the fraternity was not worth putting up with the hazing
and left. No one stopped them. They may have "told them they
were less than men," but in no way were they coerced.
Was
the hazing in the Chi Tau basement stupid, dangerous, and irresponsible?
Yes. People do stupid and dangerous things every day. I can’t imagine
why anyone would voluntarily get in a boxing ring against a heavy
weight boxer, base jump off a sky scraper, or jump 100 over a gulch
on a speed bike, but many people do these acts and sometimes they
die. No one suggests that the fault lies with anyone besides those
who chose to take such risks.
While
at the College of William and Mary, I was in a fraternity. My junior
year, one of our pledged walked out of a pledge meeting while he
was being hazed, and then decided to drop out of the process all
together. No one stopped him from doing anything. He told the administration
what happened and our fraternity lost its charter. It will be brought
back in 2008 and filled with the people who couldn’t get into a
fraternity à la the Tri
Lams in Revenge
of the Nerds. Within a year or two, they will be hazing
again. This happens to a fraternity almost every year at William
and Mary and at almost every college campus with a Greek system
in the country. Despite the best efforts of the national chapters
and the university administrations, hazing still is pervasive within
almost every fraternity at every school.
I’m
not writing this because I think that hazing is a positive social
good, but simply that it happens to tens, if not hundreds, of thousands
of students each year, it’s not going to go away anytime soon, and
only very rarely does a tragedy like the one at Chico State occur.
The reason is a combination human nature, the fact that it’s a long
established tradition, and most of all because you have a bunch
of post-adolescents with no responsibility and their parents’ money
while attending colleges where they can graduate in five years while
barely attending class. Although I have never heard of a fraternity
that made their pledges consume gallons of water, almost every single
fraternity that I know of has their pledges do large amounts of
strenuous physical exercise under unpleasant conditions. Despite
what I’m sure most Greeks would say, this could have happened at
almost any chapter at any school.
What
happened to Mr. Carrington was tragic, but at the end of the day
it was his choice to make stupid decisions, and no one else should
bear any legal responsibility. I can sympathize with his family,
because hundreds of thousands of other fraternity members like me
all consented and participated in similarly stupid and irresponsible
decisions with few, if any, consequences, but I can also sympathize
for the four fraternity members who may spend the rest of their
lives in prison for the exact same reason.
August
26, 2005
Marcus Epstein
[send him mail] is
a recent graduate of the College of William and Mary. He is currently
pursuing freelance journalism in Charleston, SC. A
selection of his articles can be seen here.
Copyright
© 2005 LewRockwell.com
Marcus
Epstein
Archives
|