Liquidate
General Motors
by
Eric Englund
by Eric Englund
General Motors
and the U.S. government have several characteristics in common.
Both are unwieldy behemoths which have become debt-laden, wealth-destruction
machines. Their workers are overpaid and under-productive (for Federal
employees, counterproductive is a more apt description). Foolish
creditors have kept these monstrosities afloat and will eventually
end up regretting ever having lent these debt addicts a dime. Yet,
each one is a public-relations machine preaching to the citizenry
that it is indispensable. The Federal government, accordingly, is
working with General Motors on a rescue
plan which entails exchanging debt and other liabilities for
equity. If this exchange offer is successful, President Obama will
be hailed, by the mainstream media, as a visionary leader with the
good sense to override the impersonal phenomenon known as the free
market. Isn’t it true, after all, that what is good for General
Motors is good for the country? Not anymore.
What is good
for the United States is an unhampered free market. In a free market,
successfully anticipating and meeting the needs of consumers are
rewarded with profits and wealth creation. Conversely, when a business
consistently loses money it must either adjust its business model
in order to compete more effectively (before its financial condition
becomes too weak), or face liquidation. Failure is not the end of
the world as the resources tied up in a failed company can be freed
up for entrepreneurs to use in other productive ventures.
In all my years
as a financial analyst, I have never seen a company as grossly mismanaged
as General Motors. This automaker’s financial destitution indicates
GM’s management team, laborers, and related union executives may
be the most incompetent in U.S. history. It is abundantly clear
Americans love automobiles. Hence, it is a no-brainer that the U.S.
is a market where a company could become hugely successful and wealthy
by manufacturing and selling cars. Since GM’s
founding in 1908, it has managed to accumulate – as of fiscal
year-end December 31, 2008 – a deficit working capital position
of $32.7 billion and a deficit equity position of $86.2 billion.
So in the course of 100 years, General Motors has sold millions
upon millions of automobiles and has managed to become profoundly
insolvent. The Three Stooges could have done a better job of running
an automaker.
Within a free
market, a company with such shockingly poor financial indices could
never be reorganized – it is plainly too far gone from a financial
perspective. Thus, it would be liquidated with secured and unsecured
creditors doing whatever they can to recover a percentage of the
monies they are owed. Common shareholders would be wiped out.
In looking
over the details of the above-mentioned exchange offer, I have no
doubt this is merely a stop-gap measure as GM would remain deeply
insolvent. Here are key points of the exchange offer:
- Common stock
plus accrued interest in cash offered for $27 billion of outstanding
public debt
- Successful
exchange to result in at least $44
billion reduction in total liabilities from
bondholders, U.S. Treasury, and VEBA
- Bondholders
to own 10 percent of GM after successful exchange offer
- Exchange
contingent on VEBA modifications and U.S. Treasury debt conversion
conditions resulting in at least $20 billion reduction in liabilities
- Expect to
seek bankruptcy relief if the exchange offers are not consummated
What if the
exchange offer is successful and total liabilities are reduced by
$44 billion? This would still leave GM with an equity position of
negative $42 billion. No company can continue to operate when it
is so incredibly broke. To be sure, this implies GM would remain
a ward of the state and the U.S. Treasury would continue to lend
it money; thereby perpetuating this wealth-destruction machine.
To
further drive home the point, as to how broke GM is, let’s do a
quick thought experiment. If Supreme Commander Obama decided to
simply give GM a "gift" of $100 billion, would all be
well at General Motors? Undoubtedly, you know the answer is "no."
Even with such a generous gift, GM would still be a precariously
leveraged company with a total liabilities-to-equity ratio of nearly
13 to 1 – using GM’s 12/31/08 balance sheet as the basis for this
analysis. It should be obvious, therefore, that the aforementioned
exchange offer is merely placing a bandage on a mortally wounded
company.
This is why
I cringe when I hear politicians and financial reporters mention
any kind of reorganization for General Motors (including Chapter
11 Bankruptcy reorganization). Any such reorganization would automatically
imply massive Federal guarantees that will come at enormous taxpayer
expense; which also indicates that productive citizens are viewed,
in Washington, D.C., as mere abstractions born to serve the needs
of America’s political elites.
The marketplace
has spoken; GM has failed and it should be liquidated. New entrepreneurial
and wealth-creating opportunities
most likely will emerge from such a liquidation. To continue down
the present path assures more wealth will be destroyed by the financial
black hole known as General Motors.
April
29, 2009
Eric
Englund [send him mail], who
has an MBA from Boise State University, lives in the state of Oregon.
He is the publisher of The
Hyperinflation Survival Guide by Dr. Gerald Swanson. You
are invited to visit his website.
Copyright
© 2009 Eric Englund
Eric
Englund Archives
|