When Purchasing Equities, Are You an Investor or
a Speculator?
by
Eric Englund
by Eric Englund
…to
suppose that the value of a common stock is determined purely by
a corporation’s earnings discounted by the relevant interest rates
and adjusted for the marginal tax rate is to forget that people
have burned witches, gone to war on a whim, risen in defense of
Joseph Stalin and believed Orson Welles when he told them over the
radio that the Martians had landed. ~ James Grant
An
investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis promises
safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not meeting
these requirements are speculative. ~ Benjamin Graham and David L. Dodd
In
general, Americans feel pretty darned smart when it comes to handling
money. Since the stock market crash of October 19, 1987, the Dow
Jones Industrial Average has gone from 1,738.40 to a March 14, 2005
closing price of 10,804.51. Granted, many people lost money when
the dot.com and telecom bubbles burst, yet Americans remain unshaken
in their collective belief that staying in the stock market will
make them wealthy in the long run. To be sure, you will hear
the mantra that "stocks always go up in the long run"
from diverse sources ranging from star Wall Street analysts (such
as Abbey Joseph Cohen) to your next-door neighbor. What a dream
world America has become where we can read the business pages, watch
CNBC, "invest" in can’t-lose stocks, and then grow
wealthy, over time, without much thought or effort. When
examining this prevalent mindset, using Graham and Dodd’s distinction
between investing and speculation, I must conclude that most Americans
are speculators not investors. This position is easy to defend.
An
important aspect of investing is to have the mindset of a business
owner. In 1983, Warren Buffett conveyed 13 owner- related business
principles for Berkshire Hathaway’s shareholders to embrace.
The first principle is potent yet simple in that Warren Buffett
and Berkshire’s vice chairman Charlie Munger view Berkshire Hathaway
"…as a conduit through which our shareholders own the assets."
Mr. Buffett further explains that
Charlie
and I hope that you do not think of yourself as merely owning
a piece of paper whose price wiggles around daily and that is
a candidate for sale when some economic or political event makes
you nervous. We hope you instead visualize yourself as a part
owner of a business that you expect to stay with indefinitely,
much as you might if you owned a farm or apartment house in
partnership with members of your family.
Indeed,
having an ownership mindset is a step toward becoming an investor,
yet, on a stand-alone basis, does not quite get you there. For if
an individual is truly an investor in a business, he would
have a basic understanding of its operations, its assets and liabilities,
its profitability, and its cash flow. Moreover, an investor would
quickly grasp the power of the following quote from Ludwig von Mises’
magnum opus Human
Action:
Monetary
calculation is the guiding star of action under the social system
of division of labor. It is the compass of the man embarking
upon production. He calculates in order to distinguish the remunerative
lines of production from the unprofitable ones, those of which
the sovereign consumers are likely to approve from those which
they are likely to disapprove. Every single step of entrepreneurial
activities is subject to scrutiny by monetary calculation. The
premeditation of planned action becomes commercial precalculation
of expected costs and expected proceeds. The retrospective
establishment of the outcome of past action becomes accounting
of profit and loss. (Emphasis added)
A
tool businessmen use to determine the success or failure of past
actions is a financial statement. A businessman and an investor
should have a firm understanding of all the entries in a company’s
balance sheet, the income statement, and in the statement of cash
flows (which are the three key components of a financial statement).
Via analyzing the company’s financial statement, a businessman can
directly correlate whether his company's capital base (i.e., the
company's net worth as reflected in the balance sheet) is expanding
or contracting depending upon if the company turned a profit or
made a loss. Such monetary calculation assists a businessman in
deciding to maintain or change a business plan based upon satisfying
the ever-sovereign consumer.
The
analysis doesn’t stop here. Businessmen and investors will also
take a keen interest in deriving the following (among others) from
the financial statement:
- Working
capital
- Quick
ratio
- Liquidity
- Debt to
equity ratio (i.e., leverage)
- Return
on equity
- Total
debt service coverage
- Inventory
turnover
- Accounts
receivable turnover
This
may look complicated and, to a certain extent, it is. Yet, to be
a true investor, such "thorough analysis" as mentioned
above by Graham and Dodd is essential. Conversely, if someone
cannot read a financial statement (i.e., a balance sheet, an income
statement, and a statement of cash flows), then when it comes to
purchasing common stock in publicly traded companies, such a
financially illiterate person is inherently a speculator, not an
investor. After all, such a speculator has no idea how to value
a business and merely owns a "piece of paper whose price
wiggles around daily." With financial illiteracy being the
overwhelming norm in America (let’s face it, public schools have
miserably failed at teaching basic accounting, finance, and economics),
I believe I have successfully defended my position that most American
"investors" are simply speculators.
Now
to bring a bit of politics into the picture here. President Bush
is touting an "ownership society" in which Social Security
reform is a cornerstone thereby allowing for personal Social
Security accounts where individuals can "invest" funds
into the stock market. I would counter that President Bush is, not
surprisingly, abusing the English language. After all, with a financially
illiterate populace (thanks again public schools), I assert that
President Bush is essentially doing nothing different from CNBC,
the stock brokerage firms, and the Wall Street Journal in
that he is promoting a "speculator society." Of course,
the key difference here is that the federal government will be coercing
Americans to speculate at gunpoint.
For
those who feel that they fit the mold of being a speculator, yet
want to make the effort to become an investor, there is hope. Let
me give you a crash course. The first step to take is to read Benjamin
Graham and David L. Dodd’s classic book Security
Analysis. This book will teach you how to read a financial
statement. The next step is to read The
Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham. As Warren Buffett
stated, it is "By far the best book on investing ever written."
Enough said. Finally, you must gain an understanding of Austrian
economics. Two excellent introductory books are Economics
for Real People: An Introduction to the Austrian School
by Gene Callahan and The
Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays produced
by the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Keep in mind that it was the
"Austrians" who correctly identified and explained
the dot.com and telecom bubbles that left so many stock portfolios
in tatters. By combining Graham and Dodd with Austrian economics,
you will have the tools necessary to become a successful investor.
After all, long-term wealth accumulation requires a great deal of
thought and effort not the opposite as promoted by America’s
financial pop culture.
March
16, 2005
Eric
Englund [send him mail],
who
has an MBA from Boise State University, lives in the state of Oregon.
He is the publisher of The
Hyperinflation Survival Guide by Dr. Gerald Swanson. You
are invited to visit his website.
Copyright
© 2005 LewRockwell.com
Eric
Englund Archives
|