Grand Old Flag?
by
Brian Dunaway
If
I see one more drawing of a flag like the one to the right I think
I'm going to have a stroke.
In
a publication from my very own town of League City, the town elders
advertised a Veteran's Day ceremony with the flag of ... uh ...
well, approximately, The United States of America.
In
the beautiful field of loyal blue are five rows of ten stars. At
least they got the numbers of stars right, and they're even staggered.
But the fold in the flag that's in the proximity of the right side
of the field hides a multitude of sins. With an equal number of
stars in an odd number of rows, I believe even the artist of this
flag would have found that the configuration of the stars on the
right side of the field looked a bit odd. And well, the artist just
wasn't quite sure about the number of stripes that fall below the
field of stars. So, in a method having little to do with perspective,
he goes with the average: five rows below the left side of the field,
six below the right. Perhaps if the fold wasn't placed where it
was, the artist would have been forced to get off his lazy butt
and visit an encyclopedia.
I
wish I could say that this was the first oddball flag I've seen
since 9-11. I've seen similar "designs" in advertisements,
on t-shirts, in paintings, and even on a Christmas card I received
last year. Gotta get those cards printed quickly for the Christmas
bonanza!
I
even saw an inspirational watercolor painting (commemorating 9-11)
that had five rows of unstaggered stars, with each row containing
stars numbering 1-2-3-4-5-7-8-9-10-11-12-13 ... and on and on.
I
didn't realize what a problem this was until I showed the above
flag to some quite intelligent patriots – they couldn't immediately
tell me what was wrong with it.
(With
awful irony, at the moment I'm writing this, up pops the Wrangler
television ad I've seen for the umpteenth time, but never ceases
to get my ire up. The music that sells the jeans is the great anti-state
song by John Fogerty (of which he no longer has the rights), "Fortunate
Son." As the stars and stripes wave, the lyrics are heard, "Some
folks are born made to wave the flag / Ooh, they're red white and
blue." End of commercial. The whole story is:
Some
folks are born made to wave the flag,
Ooh, they're red, white and blue.
And when the band plays "Hail to the chief."
Ooh, they point the cannon at you,
It
ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no senator's son, son.
It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, no.
The
song could have edited by the White House.)
This
is what the flag of the United States of America looks like.
Seriously,
the fifty stars are arranged in nine staggered rows: 6-5-6-5-6-5-6-5-6.
And if you hadn't looked closely, and someone asked, you would be
inclined to say the field is about half the height of the
flag, and guessing, knowing that there is an odd number of stripes,
you might be inclined to answer that the field is slightly less
than half the height, that is, six stripes. Not knowing, that would
be my inclination. It's an interesting optical illusion – it looks
as though the field is exactly half the height of the flag. But,
the field is actually more than half the height – seven stripes:
four red and three white.
I
suppose what bothers me about these ersatz flags is their "approximate"
nature. Surely those that carelessly display these corrupt images
are often the same folks that rarely visit their own heritage, or
their own law.
An
amorphous flag for an amorphous heritage, an amorphous constitution,
and an amorphous faith.
I
continually ask myself, "Where were all these flag-wavers before
9-11?" The Houston Grand Opera now opens each opera with a giant
flag displayed over the stage, and with a recitation of the Pledge
of Allegiance. Something about the avant-garde HGO conducting this
liturgy I find a little hypocritical.
Fear
is a miserable motivator for patriotism, which isn't patriotism
at all. Fear protects neither ancestry nor progeny, only one's own
cowardly skin.
Perhaps
I'm overly sensitive to all of this. I learned how to fold and otherwise
handle a flag as far back as I can remember. I was one of two "flag
guards" for my two remaining years in grade school. My Dad was a
scoutmaster, and my older brother and I were both Eagle Scouts.
And if possible, my respect for what the flag stood for increased
as I entered my twenties.
I
would never presume to know the heart of any flag-waver, whether
it's displayed out of patriotism, nationalism, or some admixture.
Flags certainly mean many different things to many different folks.
But it now saddens me that every time I see the United States flag
I only see United States imperialism. I genuinely hope I don't always
feel that way.
Our
current flag reminds me of the Imperial State from which we fought
so hard to free ourselves. The flag of the United Kingdom seen to
the left was an effort to symbolize the "solidarity" of the English,
Scottish, and Irish peoples by including the crosses of their respective
national patron saints: George, Andrew, and Patrick. But to be sure,
the bold red cross of St. George lies atop the diagonal crosses
of St. Andrew and St. Patrick. (In 1801 King George III added the
cross of St. Patrick to the Union Jack, and the flag has remained
the same since.)
But
as I consider the Union Jack, I think of its constituents. The Irish
and Scottish have been fighting for centuries to be free of the
yoke of the English. And even many of the English people themselves,
weary of empire, and jealous of the freedoms that their own elected
"representatives" seem to be throwing away with both hands (to the
EU and to deep space), are bringing back the old English flag. (The
English and Scottish national flags are shown to the right.)
Well
if the members of the UK can revert to their own colors, how about
us? Are we so married to the idea of the Imperial State we can fly
no other flag?
Fortunately,
I believe I can fairly say that I live in a state that is more proud
of their flag than any other. Visiting relatives from other states
remark how one is more likely to see a Texas flag flying, alone,
than the Stars and Stripes.
To
the left are the flags that currently have the most meaning to me,
in chronological order: the Betsy Ross, the Lone Star, and the Third
National of the Confederate States of America. (I'm still looking
for a sewn cloth Third National for less than $200!)
Houstonians
were recently (13 January through 28 April 2002) afforded a wonderful
display of thirty-two historic Texas flags at the Museum of Fine
Arts Houston (MFAH) entitled "Texas Flags: 18361945." My expectations
were high, but the display was even much better than I expected,
in part due to their great size (on the order of 5' x 8').
One
of the display's cocurators was Robert Maberry, Jr., author of
Texas
Flags, a great companion to the display. Mr. Maberry
was present on opening night, so I acquired my signed copy of the
book, of course.
Because
of the many flags on display that contained the dreaded cross of
St. Andrew (around half of the total, it seems), I expected some
kind of controversy. But, I am aware of none. However, I did find
it odd that the MFAH supplement to The Houston Chronicle
included images of fourteen of the flags from the exhibit,
but not one with St. Andrew's cross.
Similarly,
in Texas Journey (the magazine of AAA Texas), there are ten
images, only one of which is based on St. Andrew's cross.
Nevertheless,
Mr. Maberry seems to get his point across in this picture that appears
at the end of the Texas Journey article.

Texas
Flags was fittingly published by the Texas A&M University
Press.
Oh,
but even Texas A&M is not immune to the PC that floods our culture.
I was told last week by an Aggie alumnus that, as the result of
a student complaint, a picture of a former University president
was removed from an out-of-the-way building because in the picture's
background could be seen a painting of Robert E. Lee. I'm not easily
surprised, but I was astonished that in one of the most reflexively
patriotic campuses of the South, a picture not the subject of a
painting of one the most respected men in human history (not an
exaggeration) was removed because some idiot found it offensive.
But I digress.

Two
of the flags from the exhibit are among my favorites because of
their unabashed slogans for the preservation of faith and family.
And both are variants of the Stars and Bars (First National). (Not
to be confused with the Southern Cross (the field of the Third National
above), which almost invariably is incorrectly called the Stars
and Bars.) The flag above contains the slogan, "STRIKE.FOR.YOUR.ALTARS
& YOUR.HOMES," which pretty much says it all. The ten stars
orbiting the Texas star each represent a state in the Confederacy,
and the stars in the four corners each represent one of the four
"civilized" nations of the Indian Territory (Oklahoma) to which
the Confederacy was allied by treaty. (This and subsequent images
from Texas Flags.)
Unlike
the previous flag with its homemade quality, the flag on the right
is a work of art. The slogan on this flag of the Twentieth Texas
is "OUR HOMES and OUR RIGHTS."
One
flag that reminded me of good times was the U.S. flag that was flown
aboard the U.S.S. Texas (below), which was in service during both
World Wars. The Battleship Texas is next to the San Jacinto monument
in Houston. (It recently underwent a very expensive renovation.)
The good captain of the ship occasionally allowed our Scout troop
to "camp out" on the ship. We had the run of just about every inch
of it – we were able to see far more than the tourists did, and
unsupervised to boot.
We
explored the engine room, sick bay, and galley.
A buddy
of mine and I found officer's quarters to bunk in (we were
Patrol Leaders, after all). When I pulled the drawer open next to
the bed, the drawer was lined with an "ancient" (to an eleven-year-old)
newspaper. I carefully removed it from the drawer; it said "Japs
Bomb Pearl Harbor." My jaw dropped. (A masochistic game I like to
play involves time perspective – more time has passed from the moment
of that discovery 'til now (32 years) than from the bombing of Pearl
Harbor 'til that moment (29 years).)
Some
of the flags that were at the MFAH exhibit can be seen at the Museum
of Southern History in Sugar Land. (Alas, I heard on the radio
today that for the first time
since 1843, the Imperial Sugar plant in Sugar Land will be no more
.)
From
the Museum of Southern History's web site:
On
display through June, 2003 can be seen twenty Confederate and
Union flags that touch upon Texas history during the War Between
the States. Provided by the generosity of the Texas Division of
the United Daughters of the Confederacy, these flags are unique
both as to design and as to what they convey about the character
of the units themselves. Included are the flags of illustrious
units like the 4th Texas Infantry, 8th Texas Cavalry and Good's-Douglas'
Texas Battery. Other, unusual types, or those having extraordinary
artistic flair reveal the significance such emblems played in
the lives of those serving under them.
Several variations of First through Third National flags vie with
those of Bonnie Blue, several non-descript types, and even a homemade
U.S. flag an Austin family displayed in the latter stages of the
war. Accompanying the tastefully arranged flags are cases displaying
artifacts and memorabilia that relate to the "Lone Star" State,
or its neighbors prior to, during or after that conflict. All
in all the exhibit presents a striking look at the part of how
flags have served as patriotic symbols in American history.
A closing
note: as we send our fathers, brothers, and sons to fight in some
Godforsaken place on the other side of the planet, perhaps the least
we can do is fly the right flag.
December
7, 2002
Brian
Dunaway [send him
mail] is a chemical engineer and a native Texan.
Copyright
© 2002 LewRockwell.com
Brian
Dunaway Archives
|