The
War-Losing Losses of the U.S. in Afpak Are Rarely Noted in the U.S. Media
by
Jack D. Douglas
by Jack D. Douglas
Recently
by Jack D. Douglas: Quietly
Building the Totalitarian State in America, With the Full Complicity
of the Big Media
The death of
8 US soldiers in the mountains of Eastern Afghanistan a few days
ago has received saturation coverage in the US Media, mostly intended
obviously to increase the grim resolve to continue the war in perpetuity,
which is what the U.S. commander McChrystal is really, secretly
proposing in his Plan to win the war against the rising tsunami
of guerilla forces fighting the US. The Media people see this as
a human interest story and the public responds to the stories that
way, as a grim personal loss for the families, communities, the
growing threat of the Taliban, and so on.
I watched the
three big network tv-news programs last night to see if they ever
mentioned the war-losing losses the US suffered in that battle.
They never even mentioned the facts reported as best they know them
in the international newspaper accounts about the capture of about
20 Afghan police and army soldiers by the local militia. The Afghans
apparently were put in more vulnerable, separate positions from
the Americans, probably in good part because several American soldiers
were murdered and badly wounded several days earlier by a man in
an Afghan government police or military uniform. In any event, they
were not able to defend themselves and either were forced to surrender
or did so willingly. Either of those reasons is a huge loss for
the US, one they would want desperately to hide from the rest of
the Afghan and NATO forces. It was apparently Afghan sources who
gave the international media the details on the captures by local
militia, which would mean they want to get this news out in opposition
to the American accounts of Taliban forces. This would indicate
resentment and probably anger at the Americans, for good reasons,
since they left them hanging out there without the American big
guns and planes to protect them.
All reports
indicate the guerillas caught the Americans by complete surprise,
built up gun positions on high points over a number of days, then
used small arms – machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades – to
capture the Afghans and annihilate the Americans. [There were also
apparently about two dozen Americans in the small force of maybe
a hundred who were wounded.]
The Afghans
coordinated the move of the local guerilla units very effectively,
surrounded the Americans secretly over several days, hit them by
total surprise, and fought for a day or so against massive US fire
power from the base and the skies. They obviously knew the base
very well and could determine if they had surprise on their side
– insider information presumably from an Afghan plant, which would
further drive in the huge and growing wedge of distrust between
the Americans and the local forces they've trained. It is entirely
possible the whole Afghan unit of roughly 20 men defected.
Afghan officials
also reported that some of the attackers were men who have fled
Pakistan because of the Pakistani forces attacking them, showing
how Afghanistan is endangered by the U.S.-engineered Pakistani civil
war against the Pashtun.
This and similar
trapped American forces are obviously like Little Dien Bien Phus
[where the North Vietnamese guerillas trapped and annihilated the
French forces]. Such stealth and traps are ancient Afghan specialties,
as anyone who studies their history knows. The Americans set themselves
up for this – or, rather, their officers set them up from the top,
from McChrystal's GHG. All of this must create great distrust and
resentment among the Americans and Afghans. And delight among the
guerillas.
The dead Americans
do little to help the guerillas and may backfire on them. The captured
Afghans are a gold mine of information and leverage over their families
and possible plants in the future. Their capture is a great incentive
for the Karzai forces to melt away or get ready to surrender on
good terms. The US command knows this, so it is trying to hide it.
The Media are either too ignorant to see the obvious or are going
along with the Big Lies. The 40 to 50 million Pashtun who now loathe
the US will be more willing to join and help the guerillas and everyone
will be much less willing to risk joining the Karzai insecurity
forces. The guerillas are targeting them in every way possible all
over the country. This must be one of the most frightening ways
they've done that.
McChrystal
and all of his commanders who were sky high with Hubris when Obama
and Gates sent them in with 21,000 new, heavily armed troops and
air power several months ago are now begging for huge new forces
to save their vanity and dragging asses and lives. My guess would
be that they are now facing a pretty united, vast Pashtun nation
with at least 10 million men able to bear arms effectively against
the loathed Infidel Invaders. McChrystal is desperately planning
to retreat to the cities to save his vanity – avoid losing. But
all those millions of fighters live in the mountains and on the
plains far away. He plans to enrage them further by sending Death
Squads out from the cities – his specialty as former head of the
Special Ops black ops. That would unite them fiercely against the
US and the puppet, totally corrupt regime of Karzai.
The US will
probably stay and pay an immense price over the years to save the
vanity of the military commanders and Obama hiding in Washington.
The US will owe much of these losses to the imbedded Media which
do not report on how enraged the people have become in all of Afpak
and the whole Muslim world over the day-after-day slaughters of
women and children from the skies by US Hellfire missiles fired
by Bush and Obama.
October
7, 2009
Jack
D. Douglas [send him mail]
is a retired professor of sociology from the University of California
at San Diego. He has published widely on all major aspects of human
beings, most notably The
Myth of the Welfare State.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of Jack D. Douglas
|