The
Pakistani Crisis Has Become Acute and Global
by
Jack D. Douglas
by Jack D. Douglas
DIGG THIS
Pakistan is
one of the vast number of new states which Americans, remembering
almost no history, think of as old – even ancient – states. Like
so many of the other vast host of Post-Colonial Victims of Western
Imperialism, including Afghanistan and Iraq, Pakistan as we know
it today is a very new state born in the violent throes of the disintegration
of the British and other Western Empires after World War II and
got caught up in the birthing pangs of the inheritor of the British
Imperial Legacy, the American Global Empire.
Pakistan, like
Iraq and Afghanistan and most of these Imperial Victims, is not
a single NATION of people sharing a very common culture. Like Iraq,
Afghanistan, and so many states born in the imperial struggles,
it is a STATE made up of many different nations. It was built into
a larger form of its current status when the vast religious-political
civil war in India during the disintegration of British rule drove
millions of Muslims out of the rest of India and the British Parliament
cut the Pakistani area (mostly Punjabi and Bengali) off as a new
sovereign state for the Muslims. The newly built state included
huge indigenous Baluchi and Pashtun populations in the S.W. and
N.W. regions. The one strong, unifying force among the many nations
was Islam, with the usual sectarian divisions within that great
religion, but with a strong strain of "fundamentalism" from the
beginning because the most devout were most apt to flee to Pakistan
(and many millions of Muslims stayed in India). Many millions (mostly
Bengali) soon divided off and formed their own state of Bangladesh.
But the Pashtun and Baluchi stayed in the Pakistani state – very
uneasily because of the national differences. The Pashtun were especially
uneasy about the arrangement because the clans in Pakistan were
only half or more of the whole Pashtun nation, the other half living
immediately across the border in what we know as Afghanistan, but
which they have always seen as a seamless nation.
Pakistan would
under the best of circumstances have had a very rocky history in
the first half century of its existence as a state. (The new U.S.
nation-state had far more shared culture and other similarities
than the new Pakistani state, but the U.S. suffered a rebellion,
continual state and regional conflicts and finally a horrific Civil
War over a bit more than its first "four score and seven years.")
But its circumstances were far from the best. Its wars and lesser
conflicts with India, its giant state to the South, have continually
erupted. It has always lived in the shadows of the other two giants
surrounding it, China and Russia, the latter of which was a very
close imperialist neighbor until the dissolution of the Soviet Empire.
It has been in a state of nearly continual, low-grade guerilla war
with India over Kashmir which has flared up badly at times. It's
weak sense of nationhood at the state level of Pakistan combined
with its intense sense of more local nationhood, internal conflicts,
corrupt politics and history have led to repeated coups.
The Soviet
occupation of Afghanistan and near decade of intense warfare with
the vast guerilla movement of the Mujahadeen, of which al-Queda
was one important part, posed a continual danger to Pakistan of
Soviet encirclement and subversion. The vast resurgence of fundamentalist
Islam ["Islamism"] resulting from the growing conflicts of the Muslim
World with the West over Israel and other forms of American Imperialism
and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan has produced a state of
continual, ever-growing conflict between the great majority of Pakistani
citizens, who have become more and more Islamist, and the corrupt-secular
military dictators. And this conflict has continually divided, probably
in ever more serious ways, the Pakistani government itself. It was,
after all, the Pakistani secret police and some of the military
which, with the secret help of the U.S., provided great aid to the
Mujahadeen fighting the Soviets, including allowing the guerillas
to use Pakistan as a safe haven. When the Red Army fled in defeat
and the Empire imploded, the Pakistani secret police helped to build
the new Taliban Islamist state in Afghanistan, presumably for the
most part to protect their own Western flank from new Russian incursions,
or Iranian and other incursions in war-ravaged Afghanistan.
The U.S. annihilation
and occupation of Afghanistan was another severe threat to Pakistan
and especially to the latest military dictator, Pervez Musharraf,
and his Junta. The U.S. immediately threatened the Junta and bribed
it at the same time to provide full support for the U.S. annihilation
of the Afghan Pashtun nation-state they had helped to build and
which was still strongly supported by the twenty million or so Pashtun
in Pakistan's N.W. territories. The Junta adopted a Two-Faced Strategy
– secular-colonial submission to the U.S. outside Pakistan and Friend
of Islamism inside. The U.S. immediately tried to infiltrate the
Pakistani secret police and military with FBI and, undoubtedly,
CIA and other secret U.S. police and military, in the usual ways,
to keep them under the American thumb. But from the beginning the
Pakistanis had every reason to loathe this submission to the U.S.
Empire. They dreaded having the U.S. Empire on their W. flank. The
U.S. vowed it would not allow the Russian supported Northern Alliance
forces, which the U.S. used as its main ground force in the attacks
on the Taliban, to occupy Kabul and the regions bordering on Pakistan.
The Northern Alliance seized Kabul and became the dominant group
controlling the new security forces of the Karzai regime dressed
up to look like a Pashtun regime with Karzai in folk costume. This
was a deadly threat to the Pashtun and to Pakistan. India and Pakistan
were already nuclear nations, greatly upping the risks involved
in all the conflicts. The U.S., in good part out of distrust of
the Pakistani Junta because of their Double Game, recently openly
embraced India's nuclear program and has become a great source of
aid for that and India more generally, as India also became a major
off-shore U.S. tech center for services. The U.S. did not do any
of that for Pakistan, forcing Pakistan to ally more closely with
the feared Chinese Giant and, apparently, trade closely with North
Korea to get missile technology (possibly in exchange for nuclear
technology), which led the U.S. to be more suspicious of the Triple
Game they were playing. And all during this time the Islamists were
rising against the Junta in every way, including making numerous
attempts to murder Musharraf because of his support for the Infidels.
Life was, in
short, rather a bit dicey for the Junta. Then the real troubles
started. The Islamist and Narco-Lords' revolts against the U.S.
Empire in Afghanistan reached the open-conflict stage and started
exploding, leading to conflicts with Pakistan all along the very
long border. The Islamists became the overwhelming majority of the
people and the greatest force in the political underlife allowed
by the Junta. The Pashtun started fighting the government forces
more and more and supporting the new Islamist guerilla forces in
Afghanistan. Then the Baluchis started revolting more openly in
the S.W. and the revolt spread rapidly, threatening cut-offs of
gas, among other problems. The Junta decided to seek peace with
the Pashtun in the N.W. by making two peace agreements with the
major clans. The clans agreed to stop the flow of help to Afghanistan
and Pakistan agreed to keep its army out of the N.W. territories.
As we now see
very openly, the U.S. does not believe the clans will stop the Pashtun
guerilla movement from using Pakistan as a base. Musharraf insists
the clans will keep their word. The Pashtun clans of S. Wasiristan
have not kept their word and no one I know of expects those of the
N. to do so. But Pakistan has no real choice, as they see it. Pakistan
is now in a state of acute crisis. It is disintegrating into warring
nations and political groups. Musharraf desperately needs peace
with the powerful militias and guerilla forces of the West. His
own security forces must be more anxious than ever to get rid of
him and the U.S. Imperial forces to stop these growing civil wars
and to try to deal with the growing danger of India and China and
the Northern Alliance and the erupting Islamist parties everywhere.
The Islamists
have won in Pakistan and it is desperately important for the government
to get in step with its people and stop fighting civil wars with
them. Musharraf is completely out on a very long and weak limb with
the loathed Bush, FBI, CIA, Northern Alliance, India and all the
rest. Musharraf is making lucrative book deals and no doubt all
kinds of sub-rosa deals with the U.S. Big Corporations. He is building
his Escape Nest, as all failing dictators need to do. If he is lucky,
he will be able to escape the bullets and bombs coming his way.
Pakistan is
making the very difficult transition to a new Islamist state with
a mass Islamist movement as its foundation. It is a very dangerous
transition, or they would have taken it several years ago. The U.S.
has already threatened to annihilate them, probably a bit more "diplomatically"
than Musharraf implies to boost his book sales and try to get some
more support from the Islamists. When Pakistan becomes an Islamist
state with large nuclear forces the U.S. will be faced with a real
nuclearly armed Muslim, Islamist state. I suspect the Pakistanis
will then vow eternal friendship and the U.S. will pretend to believe
in the fairy tale because attacking a huge nation with real nuclear
weapons is a wee mite more difficult than annihilating a tiny nation
with no such weapons on the pretext they have them.
In any event,
it will be a major new development with vast global implications
for us all, none of them happy. Another Bush Catastrophe for us
all.
September
25, 2006
Jack
D. Douglas [send him mail]
is a retired professor of sociology from the University of California
at San Diego. He has published widely on all major aspects of human
beings, most notably The
Myth of the Welfare State.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Jack
D. Douglas Archives
|