An
African-American Icon Speaks Truth to the Lincoln Cult
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
DIGG THIS
"Lincoln
is theology, not historiology. He is a faith, he is a church,
he is a religion, and he has his own priests and acolytes, most
of whom have a vested interest in [him] and who are passionately
opposed to anybody telling the truth about him."
~
Lerone Bennett, Jr.,
Forced
into Glory: Abraham Lincoln’s White
Dream, p. 114
The
gigantic collection of myths, lies, and distortions that comprise
The Legend of Abraham Lincoln is the ideological cornerstone of
the American warfare/welfare state. It has been invoked for generations
to make the argument that if the policies of the U.S. government
are not "the will of God," then at least they are the
will of "Father Abraham." Moreover, this legend – this
false history of America – did not arise spontaneously. It was invented
and nurtured by an intergenerational army of court historians who,
as Murray Rothbard once said, are absolutely indispensable to any
government empire. All states, said Rothbard, depend for their
existence on a series of myths about their benevolence, heroism,
greatness, or even divinity.
Since very
few Americans have spent much time educating themselves about Lincoln
and nineteenth-century American history (much of which has been
falsified anyway), it is easy for members of what I call the Lincoln
Cult to dismiss all literary criticisms of Lincoln as the work of
"neo-Confederates," their code-word for "defenders
of slavery" (as though anyone in America today would defend
slavery), or "racist." Although they label themselves
"Lincoln scholars," the last thing they want is honest
scholarship when it comes to the subject of Lincoln and his war.
They are, at best, cover-up artists and pandering court historians
who feed at the government grant trough, "consuming" tax
dollars to support their "research" and their overblown
university positions.
But they’ve
got a big problem (more than one, actually). The big problem is
the publication of a 662-page book by the distinguished African-American
author Lerone Bennett, Jr. entitled Forced into Glory: Abraham
Lincoln’s White Dream. The book was originally published in
1999 and was recently released in paperback. Bennett was a longtime
managing editor of Ebony magazine and, among other things,
the author of a biography of Martin Luther King, Jr., What
Manner of Man. Although several "Civil War" publications
have labeled yours truly as the preeminent Lincoln critic of our
day, Forced into Glory is a much more powerful critique of
Dishonest Abe than anything I have ever written. The Lincoln Cult,
which would not dare to personally attack a serious African-American
scholar like Bennett, has largely ignored the book instead.
When they
are not ignoring the book and hoping that it (and the author) would
just go away, they "have responded by recycling the traditional
Lincoln apologies," writes Bennett. (Being a "Lincoln
scholar" means taking some of Lincoln’s unsavory words and
deeds, such as his lifelong support for the policy of "colonization"
or deportation of all black people in America, and dreaming up excuses
for why he was supposedly "forced" into taking that position).
Bennett
argues that "academics and [the] media had been hiding the
truth for 135 years and that Lincoln was not the great emancipator
or the small emancipator or the economy-sized emancipator."
He presents chapter and verse of how the Emancipation Proclamation
freed no one, since it only applied to "rebel territory,"
and specifically exempted all the slave-owning/Union-controlled
border states and other areas that were occupied by the U.S. army
at the time. He quotes James Randall, who has been called the "greatest
Lincoln scholar of all time," as writing, "the Proclamation
itself did not free a single slave." It was the Thirteenth
Amendment that finally ended slavery, he correctly notes, and Lincoln
was dragged into accepting it kicking and screaming all the way.
So what
was the purpose of the Proclamation? Primarily to placate the genuine
abolitionists with a political sleight of hand, says Bennett, and
to deter Britain and France from formally recognizing the Confederate
government.
Since so
few Americans are aware of these facts, Bennett correctly concludes
that "the level of ignorance on Abraham Lincoln and race in
the United States is a scandal and a rebuke to schools, museums,
media, and scholars." This of course is no accident; it’s exactly
the way the state wants it to be.
Bennett
is especially critical of how the Lincoln Cult uses black historical
figures as pawns in its defense of "Father Abraham." For
example, he contends that there is no way to get around the fact
that Lincoln was a lifelong white supremacist, loudly proclaiming
that he was opposed to "making voters or jurors of Negroes,
nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white
people." He said far worse things than that, as Bennett documents.
The typical response of the Lincoln Cult is to "find a slave
or a former slave or, better, a Black officeholder to say that he
adores Lincoln and doesn’t care what people say . . . "
Why, one
would ask, is such a distinguished African-American journalist so
incensed over the Lincoln myth? It is because of his twenty years
of painstaking research, resulting in this book, that proves, among
other things, what a vulgar racist Lincoln was. Bennett provides
quote after quote of Lincoln’s own words, habitually using the N-word
so much that people in Washington thought he was weirdly consumed
by his racism. Bennett tells of first-hand accounts by some of Lincoln’s
generals of how they left a meeting with him during a crisis in
the war in which the president spent most of his time in the meeting
telling off-color "darkie" jokes (Lincoln’s language).
General James Wadsworth, for example, was "shocked by the racism
in the Lincoln White House."
I will
not repeat any of this language here; suffice it to say that Bennett
has scoured Lincoln’s Collected Works and demonstrates that he used
the N-word about as frequently as your modern-day "gangster
rapper" does. Bennett also describes how this has all been
covered up by the Lincoln Cult. Despite the hundreds of examples
that are right there in black and white in Lincoln’s own speeches,
"Carl Sandburg, who spent decades researching Lincoln’s life,
denied that Lincoln used the N-word." And "Harold Holzer,
who edited a collection of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, was surprised
that Lincoln used the N-word twice in the first Lincoln-Douglas
debate." (Lincoln personally edited the transcripts of the
debates, so there is no question that he said these things).
Bennett
is also incensed by the fact that Lincoln never opposed Southern
slavery but only its extension into the territories. Indeed, in
his first inaugural address he pledged his everlasting support for
Southern slavery by making it explicitly constitutional with the
"Corwin Amendment," that had already passed the U.S. House
and Senate.
The reason
Lincoln gave for opposing the extension of slavery was, in Lincoln’s
own words, that he didn’t want the territories to "become an
asylum for slavery and [N-word, plural]." He also said that
he didn’t want the white worker to be "elbowed from his plow
or his anvil by slave [N-word, plural]." It was all economics
and politics, in other words, and not humanitarianism or the desire
to "pick the low-hanging fruit" by stopping slavery in
the territories.
Lincoln not
only talked like a white supremacist; as a state legislator he supported
myriad laws and regulations in Illinois that deprived the small
number of free blacks in the state of any semblance of citizenship.
Bennett gives us chapter and verse of how he supported a law that
"kept pure from contamination" the electoral franchise
by prohibiting "the admission of colored votes." He supported
the notorious Illinois Black Codes that made it all but impossible
for free blacks to earn a living; and he was a "manager"
of the Illinois Colonization Society that sought to use state tax
revenues to deport blacks out of the state. He also supported the
1848 amendment to the Illinois constitution that prohibited the
immigration of blacks into the state. As president, he vigorously
supported the Fugitive Slave Act that forced Northerners to hunt
down runaway slaves and return them to slavery for a bounty. Lincoln
knew that this law had led to the kidnapping of an untold number
of free blacks who were thrown into slavery.
It is understandable
how a man like Lerone Bennett, Jr., armed with this knowledge, would
begin to question The Legend of Abraham Lincoln.
Perhaps the
most important reason why Bennett was motivated to spend twenty
years of his life (and longer) researching this book is his knowledge
of Lincoln’s obsession with "colonization" or deportation.
This was what Bennett calls Lincoln’s "white dream," his
dream of simply deporting all the black people out of America.
Bennett tells
the story of how, near the end of his life, Lincoln was still "dreaming."
He asked General Benjamin Butler to estimate for him how many ships
it would take, after the war was over, do deport all black people
from America. "Beast" Butler came back to him with an
answer he didn’t want to hear: There was no way that his dream could
be accomplished with the sailing fleet that was currently at hand.
Bennett details
Lincoln’s obsession with "colonization" by describing
how he proposed to Congress compensated emancipation of slaves in
Washington, D.C. and the border states, accompanied by immediate
deportation. (Lincoln used the word "deportation"
as much or more than "colonization"). Thus, the purpose
was not freedom for the slaves so much as it was to rid America
of all blacks. It’s a good bet that you were never taught this in
school; read Forced into Glory and improve your knowledge
of the real Lincoln (and of the excuse-making Lincoln Cult that
has mis-educated generations of Americans).
Many
Americans are aware that Lincoln once said something about America
being "the last best hope" on earth. Numerous books have
been written about Lincoln with those words in the title. But the
context of these words reveals Lincoln’s darkest side, not
his "greatness," as the Lincoln Cult maintains. The context
is that these words were included in Lincoln’s plea to Congress
to "colonize" any freed slaves. He did not believe a multiracial
society was desirable and, as Bennett says, seemed "terrified"
at the prospect of inter-racial marriage. Colonization was what
he meant by "the last best hope" for America, as Bennett
shows. "In support of the White Dream," he writes, "Lincoln
mobilized the State Department, the Interior Department, the Treasury
Department, and the Smithsonian Institution . . . . Lincoln’s ethnic
cleansing plan was the official policy of the American government."
Perhaps this is a possible reason why the same government did next
to nothing for the ex-slaves after the war.
Bennett
doesn’t buy into the Lincoln Cult’s tall tale that he "evolved"
during the war and embraced equality. He quotes the man Lincoln
had put in charge of "Negro emigration" as saying that
Lincoln "remained a colonizationist and racist until his death."
The real heroes,
in Bennett’s view, are the genuine abolitionists like William Lloyd
Garrison and Wendell Phillips. Lincoln was never an abolitionist
per se and, in fact distanced himself and ridiculed them whenever
possible.
January
12, 2008
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the
author of The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an
Unnecessary War,
(Three Rivers Press/Random House). His
latest book is Lincoln
Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
(Crown Forum/Random House).
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|