The
American Dictatorship Institute
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
DIGG THIS
In response
to Ron Paul’s phenomenal fundraising successes and his widespread,
national popularity, the neocon establishment has commenced a smear
campaign. One such smear artist is John C. Fortier, a "research
fellow" at what Lew Rockwell has called the Supreme Soviet
of Neoconservatism – the American Enterprise Institute (AEI).
Writing
on the AEI website, Fortier complained that Congressman Paul "sometimes
displays a sinister conspiratorial aspect, implying that those who
disagree with him are the vanguard of dictatorial government."
The Congressman and his supporters, says Fortier, think they "are
there to stop such a dictatorship."
Fortier
is especially incensed at the fact that Congressman Paul asked him
many hard questions, and opposed some of his recommendations, when
he was executive director of something called the "Continuity
in Government Commission." In particular, the congressman was
suspicious of the neocon commissioner’s recommendation that the
president appoint members of Congress in the aftermath of some kind
of "emergency" that incapacitates Congress. (Leaving the
definition of "emergency" up to Washington, D.C. politicians
is always dangerous to liberty, as anyone with any concern about
constitutional government would know.)
Well, the
work of Fortier’s Continuity in Government Commission is now finished,
and the results of its efforts are seen in something called the
National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20/51,
also known as the "National Continuity Policy." This is
another one of those presidential "directives" that was
sneaked in under the media’s radar screen that does indeed grant
the president dictatorial powers. Judge Andrew Napolitano describes
the meaning of this "directive" in his brilliant new book,
A
Nation of Sheep (pp. 7476).
The White
House published the directive on its website after it was already
signed by the president. Most Americans who have actually read and
studied the directive, writes Napolitano, "are terrified by
its implications." They are terrified because presidential
"directives" as such can be issued without any oversight
by any other branch of government. The "National Continuity
Policy" directive "concentrates power into the office
of the president to coordinate any and all government and business
activities" in the event of a "catastrophic emergency,"
writes the judge.
The problem
this creates for the American public is that "the pliable language
in the directive creates the ability for a vast scope of executive
authority without the checks and balances of the other branches
of government," writes Napolitano. It creates dictatorial powers,
in other words.
"Catastrophic
emergency" is defined so broadly that it could include an economic
downturn, an environmental catastrophe, large-scale protests against
the Iraq war, a power blackout, a bridge collapse such as the one
on the I-35 bridge in Minneapolis last summer, a tsunami, a volcanic
eruption such as Mount Saint Helen’s, and, says Napolitano, possibly
even if "a plague of fire ants invades Crawford, Texas."
The president
gets to decide what constitutes a "catastrophe" that allows
him to enforce his own directive and assume dictatorial powers
over the government and the economy. If the president does
declare such an emergency, writes Napolitano, "he can take
over all government functions including the Congress and the federal
courts and direct all private sector activities." Moreover,
"the emergency exists until the president decides it is over."
The question is not, why was Ron Paul suspicious of the government
"commission" that dreamed up this dictatorial nightmare,
but why wasn’t every other member of Congress?
It gets
even worse. The Bush administration, thanks to the work of John
C. Fortier’s Continuity in Government Commission, was emboldened
to simply ignore the federal National Emergencies Act, passed in
1976, that was intended to prevent a perpetual state of national
emergency "and formalize Congressional checks and balances
on presidential emergency powers." They just thumbed their
collective noses, figuratively speaking, at the Congress and the
American public, and broke the law – again. But then, the president’s
lawyers have argued for years that anything he does is legal
and constitutional. The Constitution doesn’t say this, mind you;
Republican Party hacks with law degrees do.
All
of this is why, of all the former Trotskyites and other assorted
neocons who hang their hats at AEI, it was John C. Fortier who took
the lead to smear Ron Paul on the Institute’s website. It was Ron
Paul, almost alone among members of Congress, who understood the
potential devastating dangers to American liberty that might come
from a commission such as the one that was directed by Fortier.
The
"National Continuity Policy" was put in place in secret,
without the knowledge of even very many members of Congress. Fortier
must be in a state of panic. He understands that, because of his
exponentially-growing popularity, Ron Paul has the ability to expose
this atrocious attack on American liberty to the entire nation,
which may come to understand that AEI – the Supreme Soviet of Neoconservatism
– is best thought of as the American Dictatorship Institute.
November
16, 2007
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the
author of The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an
Unnecessary War,
(Three Rivers Press/Random House). His
latest book is Lincoln
Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
(Crown Forum/Random House).
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|