A Fitting
Tribute to a Corrupt Tyrant
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
DIGG THIS
The August
25 Washington Times reported that an outfit called the "
United States Historical Society," which had donated a statue
of Abe Lincoln to the city of Richmond, Virginia in 2003, was stripped
of its tax-exempt status by the IRS. It seems that the main activity
of the Society was marketing $875 miniature replicas of the statue
and pocketing the profits.
The reason
the Society lost its tax exemption is that the erection of a Lincoln
statue in Richmond was considered by many Richmonders to be akin
to putting up a statue of Hitler in Tel Aviv or of Stalin in the
Ukraine. Several affluent and influential Richmonders made it a
point to bring to the attention of the IRS the real activities of
the U.S. Historical Society. They waged a four-year campaign against
the organization and its spit-in-your-face gesture of placing the
Lincoln statue in their home town, and they won.
The statue
remains, of course, and is managed by the National Park Service,
which partnered with the United States Historical Society. The statue
is a fitting tribute to Dishonest Abe, now that the sponsors of
the statue have been revealed to be, let us say, less than honest
and straightforward. After all, enriching oneself and one’s friends
while hiding behind a smokescreen of "humanitarian" propaganda
is a major part of the Lincoln legacy. (The U.S. Historical Society
claimed that the statue would "promote healing" in Richmond!)
Lincoln
himself was a corrupt corporate insider and a lifelong mercantilist.
The economic policies that he spent his entire adult life championing
– protectionist tariffs, corporate welfare for railroad and road-building
corporations, and inflationary central banking – were nothing but
an Americanized version of the corrupt British mercantilist system
that the American Revolution was fought to discard. They were all
designed to use the powers of the state to benefit a small, politically
powerful cabal of (mostly Northern) manufacturers, bankers, and
politicians at the expense of the rest of society. They were also
designed to enlarge the state by tying all of these powerful interests
to it politically. They were all finally adopted, after some seventy
years of political debate over them, during the Lincoln regime.
Lincoln
was personally corrupt as well. In Lincoln
and the Railroads John W. Starr recounts how Lincoln presented
the Illinois Central with a $5,000 bill in the 1850s for a single
tax case, an incredible sum at the time. The vice president of the
Illinois Central was one George B. McClellan, who would become Lincoln’s
commanding general early in the war. McClellan refused to pay, so
Lincoln sued his own client. When he came to court the Illinois
Central’s attorneys failed to appear and he won the judgment by
default. Starr strongly suggests that it was a corrupt scheme concocted
by McClellan and Lincoln since the Illinois Central, under McClellan’s
direction, continued to employ him.
Dishonest
Abe invested in land in Council Bluffs, Iowa, of all places, in
1857. To this day this piece of land is known as "Lincoln’s
Hill." When he became president one of his first official acts
was to call a special session of Congress to begin work on the Pacific
Railway Act that would shower railroad corporations with government
subsidies while they built a transcontinental railroad line. When
Congress finally passed the bill in 1862 it gave the president the
right to decide the eastern terminus of the line. And guess what?
Dishonest Abe chose Council Bluffs, Iowa. What a coincidence, and
what a good example of political insider trading.
All
the big Republican Party gasbags of Lincoln’s time had their fingers
in the governmental pie of railroad subsidies. The hate-filled and
odious Thaddeus Stevens "received a block of [Union Pacific]
stock in exchange for his vote on the railroad bill, writes Dee
Brown in his classic history of the transcontinental railroads,
Hear
That Lonesome Whistle Blow. Republican congressman Oakes
Ames guided the bill through congress in return for contracts to
supply all the shovels for digging railroad beds from Iowa to California.
William Tecumseh Sherman was sold land near the railroad line at
below-market prices. The massive government subsidies, wrote Dee
Brown, "assured the fortunes of a dynasty of American families
. . ." They also led to one of the biggest scandals in American
political history just a few years later – the Credit Mobilier scandal
during the Grant administration. It was all an inevitable consequence
of the triumph of Lincolnian mercantilism.
If
you ever travel to Richmond and catch a glimpse of this particular
piece of government propaganda, think of it as a fitting tribute
to a corrupt and brutal tyrant who micromanaged the murder of hundreds
of innocent civilians in and around the very city that now is forced
to honor him with a life-size bronze statue. All to "promote
healing," of course.
September
11, 2007
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the
author of The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an
Unnecessary War,
(Three Rivers Press/Random House). His
latest book is Lincoln
Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
(Crown Forum/Random House).
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|