Selective
Memory
by
David Dieteman
Rob
Moody rightly encourages Americans not to forget the terrible events
in Waco, Texas, when David Koresh and the Branch Davidians 80 people in all, including more than twenty children were burned
and gassed to death at the hands of the federal Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, and Firearms. Janet Reno, the Attorney General of the USA
who "took full responsibility" for the 80 deaths, has been discussed
as a Democratic candidate for governor of Florida.
Which
reminds me of a headline I read a while ago: "Some scars will never
heal."
That
was the headline on my local newspaper for Sunday, June 10, 2001.
The story was in reference to the execution of Timothy McVeigh for
his bombing of a federal office building in Oklahoma City, in which
168 people died.
The
Washington Post headline proclaimed the words of one
victim's relative: "Too Easy for Him."
The
headlines which trumpeted the execution of Tim McVeigh, however,
were more than a bit incongruous, since they indicate a hypocritical
mentality on the part of the political class and the mainstream
media.
Roughly
seven years ago, Timothy McVeigh, perhaps acting with the help of
others, killed 168 people with a bomb. Consider, then, the statement
that "Some scars will never heal."
If
"some scars will never heal," why do Northerners and philosophical
Yankees continue to ridicule those who would remember the sacrifices
of the citizens and soldiers of the Confederate States of America?
Tim
McVeigh killed 168 people. Abraham Lincoln's war killed 620,000
Americans. Where the South is concerned, the combat losses rival
those of the French in World War One, and the Germans and Russians
in World War Two. In short, the CSA suffered combat losses which
are equivalent to some of the most horrific losses of life in military
history. (In this regard, see Jeffrey Rogers Hummel's work Emancipating
Slaves, Enslaving Free Men).
To
put this in perspective, half of the male French babies born in
1900 died in the First World War. Confederate losses were equivalent
to that.
Now
consider that the men and women of the Confederacy suffered not
only combat losses, but also losses to state terrorism, by which
I mean the Federal army campaign to destroy the private property
of Southerners. Perhaps you have heard of Sherman's March to the
Sea.
In
this regard, rather than the numerous historical works on Sherman's
March, consider one of the greatest novelists of the twentieth century,
William Faulkner. In The
Unvanquished, a 1938 prequel (Episode I was not the
first significant prequel in American art) to the 1929 Flags
in the Dust (originally published as Sartoris,
edited over the objections of Faulkner), Faulkner details the Yankee
invasion from the perspective of the home front.
Faulkner's
fictional Sartoris family, Southern aristocrats, and their part
of Mississippi, are shown on the receiving end of total war. Much
attention is paid to burying the silver dinner ware in the back
yard (so as to prevent its discovery by Northern troops) and to
the struggle to find food. More than a few homes are burned by Northern
troops, so that formerly well-off families find themselves living
in their fields, or in the cabins vacated by their liberated and
departed slaves.
In
the category of "some scars will never heal," consider the views
of the Yankees held by the Sartoris family. Early in the novel,
Bayard Sartoris (a main character) describes the following scene: I
was looking at the road, and there in the middle of it, sitting
on a bright bay horse and looking at the house through a field
glass, was a Yankee.
For
a long time we just lay there looking at him. I don't know what
we had expected to see, but we knew what he was at once; I remember
thinking, "He looks just like a man," and then Ringo and I were
glaring at each other, and then we were crawling backward down
the hill without remembering when we started to crawl, and then
we were running across the pasture toward the house without
remembering when we got to our feet. (pp. 27-28)
The
notion that the war "to save the union," then, misses an important
truth. It misses the truth that the South and North are distinct
regions, culturally different, and that no union was "saved," so
much as an agricultural people was conquered by an industrial people.
Later
in the novel, Bayard and his cousin Drusilla discuss the shooting
of Yankee carpet baggers. "He
is thinking of this whole country which he is trying to raise
by its bootstraps, so that all the people in it, not just his
kind nor his old regiment, but all the people, black and white,
the women and children back in the hills who don't even own
shoes Don't you see?"
"But
how can they get any good from what he wants to do for them if they
are after he has " "Killed
some of them? I suppose you include those two carpet baggers
he had to kill to hold that first election, don't you?"
"They
were men. Human beings."
"They
were Northerners, foreigners who had no business here. They
were pirates." (pp 256-57)
As
a man, Bayard is no longer surprised to find that a Yankee is a
human being. Note, however, that his cousin Drusilla regards the
Northerners as "pirates." And with good reason. Soon after her wedding,
her husband was killed in battle with the invading Northern army.
A new bride, now a new widow, Drusilla proceeded to dress as a man
and ride with the troops of Col. John Sartoris (the father of Bayard;
Col. Sartoris is the "he" to whom Drusilla refers in the extract
above).
Northerners unless they moved to the US from Northern Ireland, the Balkans,
Iraq, or some other such contemporary war zone have never experienced
anything like a foreign invasion of their homeland, and they have
no shared memories of war, invasion and resistance. Those who fought
overseas understand the evil of war: children killed, innocence
lost, fear, suffering, and pain, friends killed before their very
eyes, if not dying in their arms. Veterans understand better than
anyone that war truly is hell. And yet most American vets have not
returned to loved ones who suffered the abuses of an occupying army.
Southerners,
however, suffered the abuses of an occupying army. Southern men
suffered defeat in battle, and returned home to find their homes
and property destroyed. Such terrible suffering does not simply
disappear from memory. Daughters who saw their mothers weep remember
this until they are very old, and so pass these stories on to their
grandchildren. Remember Drusilla. In short, families do not quickly
forget nor should they the trials and tribulations of their
loved ones.
In
that regard, Charley Reese points out that the Confederate battle
flag did not fly over any state which allowed slavery. The states
had their own flags. Some, such as South Carolina and Virginia,
were adopted in 1861 at the time of secession (Virginia and South
Carolina continue to fly these flags). The Confederate battle flag,
however, was exactly that: a battle flag, a military flag, carried
by soldiers and sailors fighting in defense of their homes and freedom.
Some
scars will never heal? Indeed. One hundred and sixty eight people
died in the federal building in Oklahoma City. The federal army,
meanwhile, burned whole cities to the ground, including Richmond
and Atlanta.
Even
when whole cities were not burned to the ground, the Northern troops
perpetrated terrible crimes. As
the Catholic Encyclopedia notes, "General Sherman's occupation
of Columbia was marked by the burning of St. Mary's College, the
Sisters' Home, and the Ursuline Convent." And yet Ken Masugi of
the Claremont Institute contends that Abe Lincoln was "a fulfillment
of the Holy Mother Church." Far from it.
If
Atlanta were burned to the ground today, would the media simply
shrug? If Catholic colleges and convents were burned today, would
the media spike the stories? One hopes not.
In
the grand scheme of things, the suffering occasioned by the deaths
of 168 people pale in comparison to the suffering occasioned by
the death of roughly 300,000 people. If you understand the outcry
over the tragedy of Oklahoma City, understand that the South suffered
such a tragedy on a much greater scale. Where the vengeance directed
at Timothy McVeigh is concerned, Americans seem to have lost their
sense of perspective.
Southerners
should no more stop flying the Confederate battle flag than should
the memorial to the Oklahoma City bombing victims be torn down.
August
21,
2001
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail]
is an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2001 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
|