Invading
Iraq: Osama bin Laden Would be Pleased
by
David Dieteman
By
deciding to invade Iraq, the Bush Administration has committed a
blunder of immense proportions.
Consider
the foreign policy that Osama bin Laden the declared malefactor
behind the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks would like to
see adopted by the United States.
Would
bin Laden like to see the United States peacefully abstain from
meddling in the Arab-Israeli conflict?
Or
would bin Laden like to see the U.S. military topple an Arab regime
and occupy an Arab nation for an extended period of time, likely
killing many civilians (however unintentionally) in the process?
Without
a doubt, Mr. bin Laden (if he is alive) would like to see Option
Number Two: the U.S. military topples an Arab regime.
Why?
The
reason is that such a course of action, in all likelihood, will
provoke widespread and lasting hatred of all things American in
the Arab world.
Regrettably,
and predictably, the Bush Administration is playing into the hands
of bin Laden and others who despise the United States by doing exactly
what those genuine anti-American types want to see: the Bush Administration
is set to invade Iraq.
Worse,
the White House "brain trust" is willing to invade Iraq without
widespread international support.
Ah,
yes, you add: Britain is with Bush.
False.
Tony Blair, and other British politicians are with Bush. The overwhelming
majority of the British population is not. The same goes for Spain.
What
will become of the support of these "key allies" when their democratic
elections toss out unpopular rulers? Shall the Bush Administration
invade these nations for "siding with the terrorists?"
(As
an aside, "testosterone trust" may be more appropriate than "brain
trust" to describe the White House foreign policy wizards, given
the disproportion between brawn and braggadocio versus brains exhibited
on television by Bush, Rumsfeld, etc., but that is an insult to
males of the species).
In
closing, one can reasonably expect an American invasion of Iraq
to produce widespread and lasting dislike (if not hatred) of all
things American in the Arab world, and perhaps in other nations
as well.
Worse,
the dislike and hatred to be expected in the Arab world if the
history of Palestine since the 1940s is any indication is likely
to be violent.
And
so George Bush, rather than "defeating" terrorism, Osama bin Laden,
or any other "enemies" by invading Iraq, will almost certainly produce:
(1) more terrorists; (2) another man to take bin Laden's place;
and (3) more enemies of the United States.
Unsurprisingly,
then, by casting aside peace and freedom to make war on Iraq, Mr.
Bush and his cohorts are casting aside peace of mind and a significant
measure of freedom for all Americans for years to come.
Those
who will cheer for this war are free to do so. I will not join them.
March
24, 2003
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail] is
an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2003 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
|